I can see where nearly everyone is coming from regarding their opinions. I just want to present a different side of the discussion. People have been saying that Kane deserves the world title, due to his athleticism and his tenure. Others say his gimmick is one dimensional and he doesn't put on a great match anymore. In my opinion, I don't think it was would be a terrible idea if Kane was given the world title. My main argument goes back to 4-5 years ago when Vince McMahon took an untalented mid-carder with mediocre mic skills and terrible ring skills, changed his name, and gave him the world title for nearly a year. I know him as Justin Hawk Bradshaw, but most people know him now as JBL. Now, people are going to use the argument that Smackdown needed a heel, JBL was a big guy with a long tenure and was due. Sounds awfully similar to the situation they have now. Kane's mic skills might be on the mediocre side, but JBL's promos were nothing to go down in the history books. JBL's ring skills are easily eclipsed by Kane's (and don't use JBL's matches against Eddie in defense of his wrestling skills, considering Eddie could wrestle nearly everybody and get a good match out of them). I will say, JBL's come into his own as far announcing on Smackdown, but as a wrestler, he will never be anything more than a mid-carder who happened to have a large build and a man who kissed VKM's ass. If Vince put a belt on a worthless competitor like JBL for an entire year, I don't see why he can't put the belt on the Big Red Machine.