Why are Paedophiles...

[HBK-aholic]

But that's yourself. You cannot speak for any of the paedophiles you are chastizing, at all.

How do you know that a lot of them would never actually harm a child and can control any thought as such? If so, why should they go and get help for something that is perceived as terribly sickening and would take an awful lot of courage to admit to someone, when you don't even know if there is actual help for it in the first place?

Which leads back to me saying they;re selfish. They care more about not being labelled as 'bad', than what they could do to a child. I don't care how small the chance of it happening is.

 

[Downward Spiral]

All true. However, child porn is something that you can't really use other rules on. At the end of it all, it's an adult forcing themselves on someone that can't understand what's really happening. Whether desire or not, that's morally wrong.

Yeah, I could not ever justify the creation of child porn at all, either. But if people 'have' to watch it, no one can stop them.

It's quite a disturbing reality, but if child pornography was stopped (and it can only be logically stopped if people stop making it), there could be a very large increase in actual child molestation cases.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

I don't recall saying anything of the sort. What I DID say is that both are having sex with someone without their consent i.e rape.

It was an example, what's your answer?

 

[klunderbunker]

Yeah, I could not ever justify the creation of child porn at all, either. But if people 'have' to watch it, no one can stop them.

It's quite a disturbing reality, but if child pornography was stopped (and it can only be logically stopped if people stop making it), there could be a very large increase in actual child molestation cases.

Not entirely sure about that. The thing is, suppose child porn was completely and totally wiped out forever. Without the images of it, perhaps the amount of it actually happening would go down. Granted it would never go down to zero, but there wouldn't be porn to fuel it along.

 

[Eternal Dragon]

Thats becuase they dont want to die, Attention!

No they do, but they're not smart enough to figure out the right way to do it. Like that guy that tried to shoot himself in the face and instead it just left his jaw hanging.

Flames Out
Dragon

 

[Spunky]

Yeah, I could not ever justify the creation of child porn at all, either. But if people 'have' to watch it, no one can stop them.

It's quite a disturbing reality, but if child pornography was stopped (and it can only be logically stopped if people stop making it), there could be a very large increase in actual child molestation cases.

No-one in this world "HAVE" to do anything, No-one is born with a sexual preference, You delvelop them.

Was I born liking lesbian porn? NO! I developed a taste, Same with tomato's, Was I born liking them? no, And I didnt eat them for about 17 year's, Then I developed a taste for them.

 

[Downward Spiral]

Which leads back to me saying they;re selfish. They care more about not being labelled as 'bad', than what they could do to a child. I don't care how small the chance of it happening is.

But I was saying how there are people who would never actually harm a child and know they wouldn't. So why should they get help when there's no chance of harming someone, AND they don't even know if there's actual help for liking children? That's not being selfish, because they're not choosing themselves over anyone. A child can't be harmed by them, so there's no one to choose themselves over.

I'm not going to argue it isn't selfish, but admitting that you're a paedophile is probably one of the most difficult things one could ever do.

 

[Eternal Dragon]

No-one in this world "HAVE" to do anything, No-one is born with a sexual preference, You delvelop them.

Was I born liking lesbian porn? NO! I developed a taste, Same with tomato's, Was I born liking them? no, And I didnt eat them for about 17 year's, Then I developed a taste for them.

Just because you develop them doesn't mean you don't have them since you were born. Dormant would be the correct word.

Flames Out
Dragon

 

[Downward Spiral]

No-one in this world "HAVE" to do anything, No-one is born with a sexual preference, You delvelop them.

Was I born liking lesbian porn? NO! I developed a taste, Same with tomato's, Was I born liking them? no, And I didnt eat them for about 17 year's, Then I developed a taste for them.

You have come out with some really silly, idiotic points in this thread.

For one, even if you aren't born with a sexual preference (which in most cases, happens), having it develop is out of your control as well. So you're saying that paedophiles go out of their way to like children throughout their life? Fucking bullshit.

No, you weren't born liking lesbian porn. However, you were probably born with a mind that says 'I am heterosexual'. Hence, you develop a taste for heterosexual pornography later in life.

And second, what in the fuck does food taste have to do with anything like this? Sexual preference and food tastes have any link at all in this argument? Come on...Jesus.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

oh thats SELFISH well like tis been said. easy to say when you arent the one in the situation. Just like I say a woman having an abortion after being raped and impregnated is extremely selfish, as it would lead to the prohibition of the life of a child. in both cases, a person puts themselves first at the rate of harming a child. but its tough for me to make that call, becuase its not me in the situation. open your mind up a little bit. your acting far more ignorant than I have come to expect from you. What the fuck HELP is someone going to go get?? can gay people go get "help" for liking others of the same sex??? fuck no. its a chemical difference in these people that there can be nothing done to "fix". dont be so silly.

 

[Eternal Dragon]

oh thats SELFISH well like tis been said. easy to say when you arent the one in the situation. Just like I say a woman having an abortion after being raped and impregnated is extremely selfish, as it would lead to the prohibition of the life of a child. in both cases, a person puts themselves first at the rate of harming a child. but its tough for me to make that call, becuase its not me in the situation. open your mind up a little bit. your acting far more ignorant than I have come to expect from you. What the fuck HELP is someone going to go get?? can gay people go get "help" for liking others of the same sex??? fuck no. its a chemical difference in these people that there can be nothing done to "fix". dont be so silly.

Nicely put.

Flames Out
Dragon

 

[jmt225]

Does it make someone a bad person who has those sort of feelings towards children? No, they're just sick and need help. And common sense would let them know that, no matter what sort of life they’ve had.

Pedos who act out on their feelings, however, are fucking HORRIBLE people because as Becca said, it ruins a child for life. A CHILD can NEVER justifiably give consent to sexual actions. That's what makes an argument that pedos are the same as regular gays so flawed. It's not illegal to be gay, but it is illegal to harm children in any way. And sexually is the worst way you could ever harm an innocent child if you ask me. It destroys them for life and if it were up to me, anyone who did it would be castrated.

I mean, seriously, nothing can justify these assholes sexually abusing children. NOTHING. So they have those kinds of feelings, big whoop. If some girl stands in line in front of me at a store and has a great ass, I'm going to want to grab it, but I stop myself because it's wrong to do that. Pedos should have that same self-discipline. And me grabbing some random woman’s ass will be forgotten by the time she gets home that day, whereas abusing a child stays with that person FOREVER.

 

[Spunky]

For one, even if you aren't born with a sexual preference (which in most cases, happens), having it develop is out of your control as well. So you're saying that paedophiles go out of their way to like children throughout their life? Fucking bullshit.

Oh, I'm sorry are you a crap version of John Edwards?

Where in the fuck did i say people go out of their way to be peadofiles? At least you understood one part of my post, EVERYONE's development is 75% is other's opinion's and impressions, but as you get older you sercome to a couple of little things called logic, common sense, And Self fucking control.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

I am legit laughing at the individuals who come storming through this thread with their torches and pitch forks implying that folks in this thread are condoning adults having sex with children this is beginning to remind me of the Lance Cade gets fired for having a seizure fiasco

 

[Y 2 Jake]

I am legit laughing at the individuals who come storming through this thread with their torches and pitch forks implying that folks in this thread are condoning adults having sex with children this is beginning to remind me of the Lance Cade gets fired for having a seizure fiasco

I like this thread. Makes me want to make some TNA threads.

 

[jmt225]

I am legit laughing at the individuals who come storming through this thread with their torches and pitch forks implying that folks in this thread are condoning adults having sex with children this is beginning to remind me of the Lance Cade gets fired for having a seizure fiasco

Yeah, I only read some of the first and last pages, and certainly misjudged what I took of some of the things being said. My bad.

However, I just went through the whole thread and the one thing that bothers me is DS saying he'd rather a pedo get off watching child porn on the internet then seeking kids on the street. While, that's good in theory, but umm... don't you think those fucking kids in the kiddy porn are going to be destroyed for life too? That's why that shit is illegal dude and no one should ever view that disgusting garbage. There are plenty of ways to *********ing to something that turns you on without contributing to some fucked up website or any porn for that matter.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

However, I just went through the whole thread and the one thing that bothers me is DS saying he'd rather a pedo get off watching child porn on the internet then seeking kids on the street. While, that's good in theory, but umm... don't you think those fucking kids in the kiddy porn are going to be destroyed for life too? That's why that shit is illegal dude and no one should ever view that disgusting garbage. There are plenty of ways to *********ing to something that turns you on without contributing to some fucked up website or any porn for that matter.

Abuse is abuse, shared between friends or not.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

Yeah, I only read some of the first and last pages, and certainly misjudged what I took of some of the things being said. My bad.

However, I just went through the whole thread and the one thing that bothers me is DS saying he'd rather a pedo get off watching child porn on the internet then seeking kids on the street. While, that's good in theory, but umm... don't you think those fucking kids in the kiddy porn are going to be destroyed for life too? That's why that shit is illegal dude and no one should ever view that disgusting garbage. There are plenty of ways to *********ing to something that turns you on without contributing to some fucked up website or any porn for that matter.

totally agreed. Myself and others said simular things. well done

 

[Murfish]

No they do, but they're not smart enough to figure out the right way to do it. Like that guy that tried to shoot himself in the face and instead it just left his jaw hanging.

Flames Out
Dragon

Or people who shoot themselves through the temples and are left blind.

 

[X]

Personally, I think they are sick and need locking in a asylum, If i knew a peadofile lived colse to me, I'd rustle me up a good old mob, And light me up some torches.

Oh please, you wouldn't do a god damn thing. Odds are that you already have a pedophile living in your area. Better go grab some pitch forks. Enjoy prison and being sodomized every night.

And as KB said, adults generally know what they want, and can choose who they have. Children know nothing about sex, and bringing it into contact with them at such a young age is wrong.

Where in the beginning of this thread is it even once mentioned that these people who we are referring to have actually had sexual encounters with children? Never. The only thing I remember reading here is a discussion about people are simply ATTRACTED to children; not people who actually go out and have sex with them. Pretty huge fucking difference.

No. The people who don't seek help because they're scared of what people might say about them are disgusting and selfish in a case like this. All they care about is themselves, and not what they could do to an innocent child.

Why is it assumed that because these people are attracted to children, they have absolutely no self-control and are apparently just wild beasts waiting for prey? I'm attracted to women, should I go seek help because there's a chance that I might rape a woman? After all, I'm attracted to them just as a pedophile is to a child. Is it really that different of a scenario? No. You assume that these people are all insane and pure fucking evil, like they go home at night and slaughter an animal in the name of Satan. You don't know these people. How do you know they aren't simply sexually confused? Sexual confusion is one of the most common elements of human life. Many men have had dreams of gay sexual encounters while still being attracted to women and without pursuing those dreams. How is that any different then this scenario? Oh I know what you're going to say; "Because they're children!". So what? This is NOT a discussion about people who have sex with children; this is a discussion about people who are ATTRACTED to them. As I said before, HUGE difference.

Gay porn = 2 consenting adults.
Child Porn = an adult raping a child.
I fail to see how this is similar.

Your assumption that all sex between an adult and a child is rape is simply untrue. There have been many, many cases in which a child (and by child I'm referring really up to around the age of 14/15) actively seeked out sex with an adult.

This entire thread is fucking hilarious. You all act as though you know what you're talking about when a majority of you are just spouting mindless rhetoric. You sound like the communist-hunters of the 50s, or the witch-burners of Salem. You simply say "I don't understand this; so I hate it and it must be evil and wrong because if I can't understand it then obviously it's wrong."

This post is in no way a defense of child rapists. Because as I've said many times in this post, and it's something most of you apparently failed to comprehend from the original post in this thread, is that there is a very large and profound difference between being attracted to a child and having sex with that child.

 

[Murfish]

Your assumption that all sex between an adult and a child is rape is simply untrue. There have been many, many cases in which a child (and by child I'm referring really up to around the age of 14/15) actively seeked out sex with an adult.

While I wasn't one of the people arguing to burn paedophiles at the stake, I will say that a person who has reached the age of majority having sex with a person who is 14/15 is always rape. The reason why there are age of consent laws is because people of that age cannot make have informed consent due to there age and development. The situation is still statutory rape. It doesn't matter if the 14 year old desires it because the adult should have the will power to refrain from granting their wishes.

 

[justinsayne]

Oh please, you wouldn't do a god damn thing. Odds are that you already have a pedophile living in your area. Better go grab some pitch forks. Enjoy prison and being sodomized every night.



Where in the beginning of this thread is it even once mentioned that these people who we are referring to have actually had sexual encounters with children? Never. The only thing I remember reading here is a discussion about people are simply ATTRACTED to children; not people who actually go out and have sex with them. Pretty huge fucking difference.



Why is it assumed that because these people are attracted to children, they have absolutely no self-control and are apparently just wild beasts waiting for prey? I'm attracted to women, should I go seek help because there's a chance that I might rape a woman? After all, I'm attracted to them just as a pedophile is to a child. Is it really that different of a scenario? No. You assume that these people are all insane and pure fucking evil, like they go home at night and slaughter an animal in the name of Satan. You don't know these people. How do you know they aren't simply sexually confused? Sexual confusion is one of the most common elements of human life. Many men have had dreams of gay sexual encounters while still being attracted to women and without pursuing those dreams. How is that any different then this scenario? Oh I know what you're going to say; "Because they're children!". So what? This is NOT a discussion about people who have sex with children; this is a discussion about people who are ATTRACTED to them. As I said before, HUGE difference.



Your assumption that all sex between an adult and a child is rape is simply untrue. There have been many, many cases in which a child (and by child I'm referring really up to around the age of 14/15) actively seeked out sex with an adult.

This entire thread is fucking hilarious. You all act as though you know what you're talking about when a majority of you are just spouting mindless rhetoric. You sound like the communist-hunters of the 50s, or the witch-burners of Salem. You simply say "I don't understand this; so I hate it and it must be evil and wrong because if I can't understand it then obviously it's wrong."

This post is in no way a defense of child rapists. Because as I've said many times in this post, and it's something most of you apparently failed to comprehend from the original post in this thread, is that there is a very large and profound difference between being attracted to a child and having sex with that child.

Ok, now it's pretty rare when I agree with X on pretty much anything, but this posts hits it on the head, he is absolutely right, the vast majority of the people in this thread have absolutely no fucking clue as to what they are talking about, seriously people you need to do some damn research and try to understand the shit you are talking about before going off on the subject, and two other things, first for all the people that say pedophiles should be castrated, that solves nothing, because what makes them attracted to children it is in their head, it's a mental thing, just cause they don't have a dick anymore doesn't mean they won't still feel the desire to be with a child anymore, and two most of the "children" in child porn are well into their teens, so to say they know nothing about sex and are all unwillinging is just dumb, I mean seriously, how many teenagers do we have on this site?, and how many of those teenagers have fucked?, I mean come one people you do realize that as long as someone is under the age of 18 they are still considered and child right?

 

[Uncle Sam]

/Thread.

 

[Murfish]

?

 

[HBK-aholic]

Your assumption that all sex between an adult and a child is rape is simply untrue. There have been many, many cases in which a child (and by child I'm referring really up to around the age of 14/15) actively seeked out sex with an adult.

It IS rape. So you're telling me someone younger than 13 can actively consent to sex with an adult? No way. They're not mature enough, and don't fully understand the implications. As much as I don't like the statutory rape idea, it is there for a reason, this is rape.