Steamboat Ricky
WZCW's Living Legend
Because kayfabe voting doesn't give us an accurate reading of who were the "best." And it is extremely biased. Literally anyone could beat anyone looking from kayfabe. Bryan has beaten Cenza clean. I guess that makes him a better wrestler overall. Kane beat Taker 3 separate times on PPV with the world title on the line, thus we should all vote Kane over Taker in the WZT.
What makes anybody a better wrestler overall???? I guarantee that if Cena faced Bryan in the WZT that the vote would be a lot closer than "should" be considered. But isn't the true measure of a good wrestler his popularity/heat at any given point? Isn't that what sells? And isn't that the point of wrestling since it isn't a legitimate athletic contest?
Someone should have the opportunity to make cases for Kane over Taker if they want to. And you should have the opportunity to dispute it.