3/4 facelock: my sentence structure and use of punctuation is atrocious when it comes to journalism standards. But i'm on WZ, i'm not writing a test or writing a story. No one here writes perfectly, myself included, and i don't strive for it. I just type and send. I don't live in America so no i'm not getting a tertiary education or becoming a doctor. I have my history and my journalism. Two degrees, four years each. I've also watched wrestling since 1986. So I might know just a little about wrestling and the way the world works. I write run on sentences here all the time. So what? So does everyone else..And i don't write anything here like a text message. If i did i would be abbreviating every word i write and i haven't done that so far.
Looks like you've won this argument in your own mind there 3/4 facelock for wishing me luck a second time and calling me ma'am. I can call you ma'am there too you PG loving sissyboy. Looks like i have emotional and social struggles because you said so. You know all about me because you didn't like what i wrote on wrestling forum. And your opinion counts more than mine because you hate TNA and i don't. If it wasn't for you continuing to talk about the topic at hand that you yourself can't seem to stick to, then i wouldn't even know there was a topic at hand. I bring my life and my accolades into a conversation ONLY when some douchebag hypocrite wishes me the best of luck with my life that i've already lived quite well and had much luck and success with. You brought it up, now like a hypocrite you're telling me it doesn't matter about my life when we're on a thread talking about TNA and why people on a TNA thread don't watch it when they most obviously all do. Well, then don't wish me luck with my life wish yourself luck with your life so that some day you can understand your own hypocrisy. Stop taking petty jabs at my character because your reasoning is shit..it has nothing to do with the thread. I must have problems because i don't agree with you buddy. Whatever, run off like a little girl, call me ma'am and attack my character. Taking the dumbass route of attacking someone's character because they don't agree with your opinion is a sign of a drooling idiot. So you've branded me a drooling idiot just like you've branded TNA shit. Your pretty good at negative connotations, that's what TNA bashing smarks do best. So if you're gonna be a drooling idiot and it's the cool thing to do, i'll be one right now and be just like you and go attack anothers' character.
itssoeasy: your opinion is that WWE is entertaining. Wade Barret, Alberto Del Rio, Dolph Ziggler, Daniel Bryan are the future just like everything on MTV is the future of music. Shit music. There's so much good music out there without financial backing, without videos. It has artistic quality, it will gain critical praise and some of it will last forever if it reaches legendary status, with or without MTV airplay. It's your opinion that WWE is good, you are allowed to think like that and feel like that. Most wrestling fans and little children think like that because that's all they really have. And PG doesn't have to suck, it hasn't always sucked, it just does now in 2011 and has been that way for about half a decade. And that's my opinion. It's not the PG rating that makes wrestling suck, in my opinion, it's just an excuse WWE can hide behind. PG wrestling in the 80s and 90s was fine. Chairs were used, blood could happen. It can't now. Great angles and stories could be told. They can't now. It's all about image and using production quality to create the illusion that wrestling is entertaining. I swear, today, the only exciting thing about WWE is that their production quality confuses the average fan into believing WWE is worth watching. That's just my opinion and you don't agree so whatever. WWE uses all its money to make you think its worth watching just like any show produced by any corporate billionaire.
More people out there think like you do than think like i do. So does that mean your argument or opinion has more merit or does it mean there are just more people out
there lacking taste and individual, uncontaminated reasoning? Again, there are more people watching Jersey Shore than RAW and most Jersey Shore viewers would say that their show is more entertaining and therefore better than RAW. Doesn't mean it is, even though their ratings are higher and more people think like that enjoy that kind of garbage..but it doesn't mean their opinion has more merit because it's part of the consensus. Quite the opposite actually. It just means there's more of them than there is wrestling fans. Mass opinion molds individual opinion too much. TNA may very well be a lot worse than WWE. There's reasons for it, i've discussed them to death a million times before here..and they don't need to be rehashed here. It's like beating a dead horse 10 years after it's death. It's so annoying and childish to listen to. Pointless.
It's so easy to dump on TNA. It's so easy to dump on anything. It's so easy to see where you got your name.
