LMFAO, why does Taker get credit for the Wrestlemania buyrates? He's been at Wrestlemania 22 times and some of them are the lowest ever. If Taker was a consistent draw, the ratings would've been consistently high. But when Taker is the highlighted and put on as the ME, the buyrates go down. WM 13 and WM 26 are great examples of this. When Cena and Rock highlighted WM the rates went up. But then again if Taker is getting credit for their work I never want to hear that HBK wasn't a draw again. Taker NEVER moved the needle, he was just there when other people did. Whether that was Austin, Hogan, Rock, Cena, or someone else. Saying that Taker is the reason for the WM buyrates is kind of like saying Miz is the reason for WM 27 success.