So your argument is that because WCW did better ratings at that period then TNA ever did it's automatically better? What a load of bull, WCW did good ratings despite the product being awful due to the the time slot it had and wrestling still being a mainstream attraction. To suggest that the show that had a pinata on a pole match while Ed Ferrara impersonated a man with bells pallsy on commentary was better then Christians run in TNA is ridiculous. There's also the fact that Booker T won world titles in WCW while Vince Russo was booking the show. The man treated titles like props and nothing more. The fact that booker T lost the World title to Vince Russo shows how much credibility the title had lost during Bookers reign at the top of WCW. You forgot the fact that in TNA Christian was on his way out when he lost to Booker so naturally he was never going to win in his last few matches seeing as he didn't need the rub while Booker T did. Besides in this tournament were supposed to judge it based on both men in their prime meaning win/loss records don't mean shit.