I'll go point by point kingshaw.
1. Gail Kim is a more talented performer than any woman in WWE. ODB and Kong's matches have psychology. Power vs. power, and they use power moves. The WWE's women's division has no psychology and it's to the point where they just throw people out there. Maria getting a title match because she was in playboy is akin to giving to Lance Storm a title match because he writes a column. As far Christy Hemme and So Cal Val being the only hot women in TNA, I bet I could find a lot of guys that think Angelina Love, Velvet Sky, and Gail Kim are attractive. Your stating your flawed opinion as fact shows that you are a jackass. KingShaw is right because he said so. Stupid. As far as WWE using THEIR divas properly....really? Kelly Kelly plays Ricky Morton is a twelve-diva tag match when Michelle McCool and her athletic ability don't get into the ring? The GoDaddy girl getting an almost year-long title reign? Melina, who has talent, not getting a title shot for how long now? Jillian, who is capable of the 450 splash not getting to wrestle, but being used as Melina's valet? Ashley not getting into the Monday night match when she can move? Should I continue, or should I rail on your education for not teaching you how to use there, their, and they're properly?
Why not use the women's match as main event? Gail Kim and Awesome Kong put together good women's matches, as a matter of fact, good matches in general. They use psychology, show desire, and have more moves than John Cena.
Saying that no one cares about women's matches smacks of sexism. Not that I am, by any means, a feminist, but I have learned through the years that women are capable of a lot of thing, and that is apparent by looking at marathon and triathlon times. The women keep getting closer to the men, and eventually may overtake them. In wrestling, women weren't given many chances because the men who run the business have THEIR heads as far up THEIR asses as you.
As far as Hacksaw goes, he is on TV at least once a month, sometimes more. He got signifigant camera time in the 17 on 2 match, and has tagged with Super Crazy time and time again. It's not my fault you don't watch the show, just stop making sweeping generalizations and trying to look smart. And seperate your paragraphs so we know what the fuck you're talking about. Or, so you know what I'm saying, so we know what your talking about.
Scott Steiner has more moves than Cena does as well. Furthermore, he's not that sloppy. He may not be lightning quick, but at least he knows his limitations, and he doesn't go out and fuck up time and time again like CM Punk. You want to talk sloppy, we can start and end there. Furthermore, WWE matches have too much punchy kicky, and the higher-ups limit people's abilities. I am sure that WWE guys have more ability, but they are so handcuffed we get Jeff Hardy looking like a brawler until his finisher or one of his special moves.
As far as your comments on Samoa Joe, there is a reason he gets votes for wrestler of the year. If you read the forums, instead of trolling around trying to be a dumbass, you would see nothing but love for Joe time and time and time and time again. His matches are always entertaining and the moves chain together well. He works a body part, weakens his opponent, and then goes in for the kill. Half of WWE's finishers come out of nowhere. You see it, markout, and then wonder how the fuck that happened. Whereas in TNA, matches build to a logical conclusion.
I personally like the Deuces Wild tournament. It is an innovative idea. Making Christian and Rhyno one of the "established tag teams" isn't the best of ideas, and neither is leaving out the Machine Guns, but I think they are building to a breakup because of Shelley's backstage antics.
Tomko is revered in Japan as a great worker. Your not liking him is once again an opinion that you state as fact. Once again, that is what six year olds do. Learn to understand that other opinions are valid, and judging based on the intelligence oozing from your post, most of them are far more valid than your's.
And you're right, AJ has been held back by being in that tag team, if you consider being aligned with the biggest star in the company (Kurt Angle) and getting to go over him in the storyline love department, with Angle's wife, making him look weak. Or that fact that he is involved in every main event or co-main event getting held back. Do you even watch wrestling? HE is effectively the crowd favorite in a heel faction, a role usually reserved for The Rock, or people of that caliber.
You're right, rock n Rave is pathetic, but outside of mic skills, so is Santino, and he is #1 contender for the tag belts. And you said Christy Hemme makes them important? So she is being used properly, I could have sworn you said
Originally posted by Kin-It doesn't matter what his name is
At least WWE uses there divas properly by showing off their looks instead of their wrestling skills.
Ummm, so yeah, contradictory much? Learn to be consitant in your thoughts within the same grammatically incorrect run on paragraph/essay.
Sharkboy and Curryman are 10 times more over than the World Tag champs, Rhodes and Holly. So good idea not to comment, because you would have looked more misinformed than you already do. Both are great workers, who's personality shines when they are in the ring. You know, the opposite of Randy Orton, the top heel on Raw. Speaking of top heels, do we need to compare Angle to Orton, or will grant TNA's superiority.
There is a reason that WWE has been piggybacking TNA. You don't believe me? Thursday last, TNA gives you a free world title match, Monday.....Raw did the same. Matt Morgan gets a push straight out of TNA management. The next week the Raw GM is King of the Ring. WWE is afraid, very afraid. TNA is running an angle with a love triangle between a guy, his friend, and his girl. That is a real life event, whereas, WWE runs incest angles.
The difference between Rhyno and Edge's spears is that one is an undercard markout and the other is a Main Event championship level finisher. I do not deny that Edge is a great performer on the mic and in the ring. He is one of my all-time favorite wrestlers. My point in that argument is that one guys finisher in TNA is not another guys transitional move. The codebreaker is Y2J's finisher, and half the x-division uses it as a springboard move to get back in a match. By comparison the backstabber looks weaker, and yet it belongs to the other #1 tag contender. That is non-sensical at best, and stupid arrogance by the WWE at worst.
Look in HHH threads and you will see that I am not the only person saying that Pedigree is not the same. In the early days it looked like a double arm piledriver. The guys head was driven into the mat. Now HHH lets go on the way down. I fall harder onto my bed at night that guys fall in the Pedigree now. It is mot the same damn move it has laways been.
TNA's bad matches? The WWE championship match ended with a heel slapping the ref and getting tossed, ON A PPV. People payed for that match and that is what they got. And you have the audacity to challenge TNA, who put on what will likely be match of the year at their last PPV. Please tell me one TNA match, that was near or at the top of the card that ended in a screwjob like that at a PPV? I'll help you, NONE!!!!!!!!!
We do agree that we want the best for TNA, but you seem to be so cynical that you won't ever see it. Your comments about Joe, the women's division, and Tomko are your opinions. I will grant that you have every right to have them. But, if you read the forums here, or anywhere on the internet, you will see the great majority of the IWC disagreeing with you. I am not saying that my opinions are absolute fact either. I know people will disagree with me, but at least know some facts, and how to present an argument before you come with weak shit like that. QueenShaw, you are one step up from the people who write in text message, so good for you.
