Actually if i remember correctly about a specialised match at WM, didnt Undertaker have a Hell In The Cell in WM15 against Big Bossman?
Actually that is correct. However, I can't see a HIAC main event happening at Wrestlemania. Like I said, overkill.
And to be quite honest, I can't believe some of the things I'm hearing. I'm not the type to be condescending in a forum or disrespect what other people have to say, but some of the predictions I'm hearing just aren't gonna happen no matter what.
First off, Undertaker will not retire after Wrestlemania whether he wins the title or not. He's worked so hard to get back to the top and once he finally does he's not just gonna give it up. And like I've said, Undertaker would make such a great champion and it's a travesty that his last title reign was during his biker gimmick. It would be a total waste to just have him give up the title right away and not get to see Taker with a full run as champion once again.
Secondly, I can't believe that some people are saying to expect/that's it's obvious that the match will end in a DQ. Ok, so I can't guarantee that WWE won't be stupid and have that happen, but I think it's extremely unlikely. WWE has been known to do some dumb things, but I don't think they'd end such a high-profile Wrestlemania main event in a DQ like that, especially with Taker in the mix. I know he won by DQ once, but that was a long time ago and it wasn't in the main event. Besides, if they weren't gonna have Taker win the title, they probably wouldn't have had him win the Rumble, and instead would have had him take the plan B route to Wrestlemania like Michaels did. Also, Batista can't keep the title forever, eventually he's gonna have to lose it, and if you ask me it's better for him to lose it while he's still over than to shove him down everyone's throats until we all hate him.
Thirdly, since we've started getting to the topic of Cena vs. Michaels, in response to DXrulz it is not a given that Shawn Michaels will beat Cena. A lot of people thought Triple H would definitely beat Cena last year, but I had a strong feeling Cena would win. This time around I'm not quite as sure, which I know may sound weird considering Triple H has been built up way more than Shawn Michaels (some might disagree with that but that's my opinion). But you just never know what WWE will do. I think back then they thought it would help a lot in putting Cena over more, but now he's about as over as he can be, and beating Shawn Michaels probably won't do much to improve it, which is why Shawn Michaels being the less built-up star might work in his favor. Especially because Triple H has been world champion 10 times, so if Triple H would have won back then it would have possibly been a case of been there, done that. I'm not saying Triple H won't win the title again, but at the time I felt that was the logic, although I would have prefered to have Triple H as champion over Cena any day. But just like Taker, I feel Michaels has one more title run left in him.
And as for Edge winning the MITB and going after Taker right after Taker winning the title...there are so many things wrong with that I don't know where to start. First off, Edge isn't gonna win the MITB, I can practically guarantee it. He might not even be in it for all we know. Do I think he might win over RVD tonight to be in it? It's possible, especially considering RVD's status in the company at the moment, but the problem with that would be that if they did put Edge in it, it would be almost a given that Orton would have to be in it, and the MITB match needs more people who haven't been in the main event picture yet. But even if he's in it, Edge won't win it because we've already been there. Plus, let's just say he did win the match. There is no way in hell they're repeating NYR last year, especially in this situation. I know you weren't really saying it as a prediction Mike, but even as a hypothetical, it wouldn't make any sense whatsoever.
Think about it.
