Twist...

In the 2nd QTR. To the truth's recollection, Warner tied the game in SB 36, and took the lead in SB 43.

And they lost because of his earlier HUGE mistakes. Just because he leads them back doesn't mean you can discount what happened earlier. It's like shooting someone and bringing them back to life with CPR only to have them die anyways from the gun shot wounds.

Comebacks from 15 years ago aren't helping anybody right now. I'm glad he leads his team to victory against the Broncos. Congratulations. What does he do in the playoffs?

He has won a Super Bowl. Gone to multiple title games, and has the record for passing yards in the playoffs
 
Which play was that?

For one, Brett Favre fumbled the ball.

Secondly, the Vikings struggled in the red zone all day so it's premature to assume a TD. Man, you're strugglng.
No, like I said, every fucking analyst in the world agrees that AP fumbled the ball, including Aikman.

Sorry you feel weak and intimidated.
That was just lame. Try harder.

What was all that nonsense at the end? I guess I should assume you as uneducated next time I encounter you.
Wait, let me see if I have this right.

You don't understand what I'm saying, so I'm the uneducated one? How stupid are you? That doesn't even make sense. But here, I'll explain it for you, in smaller words so you may understand it.

In the OT (that stands for over time), Brees threw a ball which went way over the receiver's head. There was a small amount of contact by the defender, and a lot of people have thought the ball was uncatchable (meaning that the receiver couldn't catch it). So, by rule, it should not be pass interference. It was called a Pass Interference though.

Are you telling me the defense couldn't have stopped the Saints in OT, including not getting a Pass Interference call?

You're an idiot. Just like the Vikings had chances after AP's fumble in the red zone, they had the chance to stop the Saint. They didn't though.

Really? Is it the same thing?
Uhh, yes it is. If you're going to try and say that AP's (and especially Rice's) fumble didn't hurt the Vikings because the Vikings still had a chance to win the game after it, and then try to say that Favre's INT was the thing that cost the Vikings the game, then you're even stupider than Big Sexy gave you credit for.

It is the same thing.

Every analyst said that, or just Troy Aikman? Troy Aikman makes an average of 12 blunders a game.
Yeah, you know better about the QB to RB handoff than Troy Aikman, a Hall of Fame QB who handed off to a Hall of Fame RB.

Dumbass.

I'll school you for free.
No thanks, your "education" would wind up costing me several points in my intelligence quotient score.

Why would you sign him for that when he hasn't done so in 15 years?
Which is why the Jets improved by 5 games last year from 07, and the Vikings went from being ousted in the first round of the playoffs to almost going to the Super Bowl, right?

Dumb ass. Idiots like you make real football fans look bad.

Well, if Longwell kicks the field goal the Vikings are in the Super Bowl.
No, if Longwell MAKE the field goal, the Vikings are in the Super Bowl.

But which would you rather have...a 37 yard FG attempt or a 55?

I rest my case.

It's freaking stupid to insinuate that the throw was good because it increases the chances of the field goal. Of course a closer FG is easier to make, but you know as a QB your job on the play is to take care of the ball, Favre got nervous and choked again.
He got nervous? Bullshit. If he got nervous, he would have ran and slid. If he had been nervous, he wouldn't have been able to look across his body and make that throw, he would have looked straight ahead and ran.

I called Favre choking, throwing 2 picks and having 1 fumble, yes.
He didn't fumble, but good try.

And, like I said, get back to me when you have an answer for AP's fumble which cost them 7, and Rice's fumble which gave the Saints 7.

Better yet, get back to me when you have a clue on how football actually works.
 
And they lost because of his earlier HUGE mistakes. Just because he leads them back doesn't mean you can discount what happened earlier. It's like shooting someone and bringing them back to life with CPR only to have them die anyways from the gun shot wounds.



He has won a Super Bowl. Gone to multiple title games, and has the record for passing yards in the playoffs
Just remember it's okay for Warner to turn the ball over in a costly situation when the Cards had a chance to go up 14-10 in the SB. But it wasn't okay for Favre to have a turnover or two.
 
HE TOOK THE CARDINALS TO THE LEAD AFTER THAT. THE GAME WAS NOT ON THE LINE IN THE 2ND QUARTER

Simple enough?

Yeah, and I'm pretty sure had Favre gotten the ball in OT he would have led the Vikings to victory. Yet, I bet you would still be calling him a choke artist just because of that one INT, huh?

Moreover, Favre did much better against the Saints than Warner did. When Favre got knocked on his ass, he got right back up, and continued to lead the Vikings down the field countless times. What did Warner do? Go to the back, comeback and do absolutely nothing. You know why? Because he isn't half as good or tough as Favre. Fact.
 
This just confirms "Moron" status for you.
Coming from the person who thinks the only time in the game that matters is the last minute, I highly doubt you have the right to call anyone a moron.

Why even bother playing the other 59 minutes?
 
And they lost because of his earlier HUGE mistakes. Just because he leads them back doesn't mean you can discount what happened earlier. It's like shooting someone and bringing them back to life with CPR only to have them die anyways from the gun shot wounds.

That's a horrible comparison.

It wipes the slate clean. He made the most of his opportunities. Even Favre did yesterday before the choke. The Vikings were tied, he fumbles.. the Vikings were down and he throws pick #1. The game ended up tied. If the Vikings win I would have given Favre credit.

He has won a Super Bowl. Gone to multiple title games, and has the record for passing yards in the playoffs

So has Kurt Warner, who has gone to MORE title games, and has the record for passing yards in the Super Bowl.

That was easy.

Now back to Elway. You are essentially stating throughout this thread that it doesn't matter when events occur. Explain why his 98 yard drive in 37 seconds is heralded in history while Koy Detmer has done the same thing, thrown a TD pass.

Read up: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/437932/a_girls_guide_to_understanding_football.html
 
I most certainly do. In fact, I bet I have a better understanding of it than you do, because I actually understand the things that go into WHY a player "chokes".

And like I said, I know better than you do what a choke is.

A choke is not making a mistake. Michael Jordan missed game winning FG shots...did he choke too? Or did he just make a mistake?

When a player chokes, it's not because he makes a mistake, it's because his focus becomes so narrow that the only thing the player can concentrate on is a single point, usually a problem within himself.

That's not what happened here. If Favre "choked", then how did he make those two dead on passes earlier in the drive, the first on 3rd and 8, and the other the 20 yard pass to Rice on a most beautifully thrown ball? The fact is that he couldn't have. The pressure on Favre on the INT was no greater than the pressure on him earlier in the drive, and he made two passes to get the Vikings into score position.

Favre didn't choke, he just threw an errant pass in an attempt to give his kicker the best chance possible. Please understand what it actually means to choke before you come up with this bullshit.


You made a pretty good point there Sly. All right, perhaps he didn't "choke" but his mistake sure as fuck didn't help them. Like I said, Favre did not lose them that game alone, but they had a real shot to win right infront of them and Favre did blow that chance. Obviously a shitload of things go into the outcome of a game, but that was the death blow in that game.
 
Warner had two costly turnovers, 1 at the end of each half and he gets no blame by you whatsoever? Yeah, just the blind Favre hatred.
 
You made a pretty good point there Sly. All right, perhaps he didn't "choke" but his mistake sure as fuck didn't help them. Like I said, Favre did not lose them that game alone, but they had a real shot to win right infront of them and Favre did blow that chance. Obviously a shitload of things go into the outcome of a game, but that was the death blow in that game.
Well, personally I think the death blow was the FG the Saints kicked in OT, but this is probably the closest we'll get to agreeing.
 
Eh I was well beyond trashed at the bar last night when I was watching that game though, so I guess my analysis isn't exactly ESPN-quality.

Still, Favre showed what has held him back his whole career again, and that's the costly interceptions in big time situations.
 
No, like I said, every fucking analyst in the world agrees that AP fumbled the ball, including Aikman.

Cite it.

Also cite other instances of botched handoffs by other QBs and see who received the blame.

That was just lame. Try harder.

:rolleyes:

Wait, let me see if I have this right.

You don't understand what I'm saying, so I'm the uneducated one? How stupid are you? That doesn't even make sense. But here, I'll explain it for you, in smaller words so you may understand it.

You had mindless babble at the end of the sentence, which served no purpose. An educated person would have picked up on this.

In the OT (that stands for over time), Brees threw a ball which went way over the receiver's head. There was a small amount of contact by the defender, and a lot of people have thought the ball was uncatchable (meaning that the receiver couldn't catch it). So, by rule, it should not be pass interference. It was called a Pass Interference though.

Thanks. Irrelevant to the topic at hand.

Are you telling me the defense couldn't have stopped the Saints in OT, including not getting a Pass Interference call?

Pretty good to hold the league's best offense to a FG, considering it doesn't matter when these events transpire.

You're an idiot. Just like the Vikings had chances after AP's fumble in the red zone, they had the chance to stop the Saint. They didn't though.

Actually, the Vikings defense played very well after those turnovers. They never trailed by more than 7 in spite of those turnovers.

Uhh, yes it is. If you're going to try and say that AP's (and especially Rice's) fumble didn't hurt the Vikings because the Vikings still had a chance to win the game after it, and then try to say that Favre's INT was the thing that cost the Vikings the game, then you're even stupider than Big Sexy gave you credit for.

In the end, the Vikings had a chance to win, in spite of even Favre's earlier INT, which you seem to have forgotten about.

Yeah, you know better about the QB to RB handoff than Troy Aikman, a Hall of Fame QB who handed off to a Hall of Fame RB.

Hypocrite.

You are saying Aikman is incorrect in his assertion that Favre cost the Vikings the game, as you are also claiming superiority in football knowledge to Trent Dilfer, Tom Jackson, and Terry Bradshaw, among others. Surely the jury would believe a gym teacher rather than a slew of Super Bowl winning QBs.

Dumbass.

No thanks, your "education" would wind up costing me several points in my intelligence quotient score.

Dropping from 65 to 60 still renders you feeble-minded.

Which is why the Jets improved by 5 games last year from 07, and the Vikings went from being ousted in the first round of the playoffs to almost going to the Super Bowl, right?

Right. That's why the Jets regressed by two games from 2006 (you know, that season where a 2nd round rookie QB WASNT the starter).
Dumb ass. Idiots like you make real football fans look bad.

:lmao:

No, if Longwell MAKE the field goal, the Vikings are in the Super Bowl.

There should be an "s" after "MAKE".

We'll never know if he would have made it because Favre took away the chance.

"But he has so much fun playing the game!".

My bad.

But which would you rather have...a 37 yard FG attempt or a 55?

I rest my case.

37 yard FG was never an option you idiot.

He got nervous? Bullshit. If he got nervous, he would have ran and slid. If he had been nervous, he wouldn't have been able to look across his body and make that throw, he would have looked straight ahead and ran.

Nah, he's done it before. It's a pattern. You are describing what a clutch QB would have done. A clutch QB wouldn't have made that pass, nor the pass in the 2007 NFC CG, nor the pass in the 2004 WC game, nor the pass in the 2003 DIV playoff game, nor the 6 picks in the 2001 DIV playoff game.

Intelligent people notice patterns.
He didn't fumble, but good try.

HE FUMBLED. IT'S A FACT.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gamecenter/live/NFL_20100124_MIN@NO

And, like I said, get back to me when you have an answer for AP's fumble which cost them 7, and Rice's fumble which gave the Saints 7.

I will , when you explain Favre's first INT. Don't try with the ankle thing either, happened AFTER he threw the ball.

Better yet, get back to me when you have a clue on how football actually works.

Aww, you feel insecure. Go get your bottle and have mommy change your diaper.
 
Now back to Elway. You are essentially stating throughout this thread that it doesn't matter when events occur. Explain why his 98 yard drive in 37 seconds is heralded in history while Koy Detmer has done the same thing, thrown a TD pass.

No that is wrong for reasons. 1. Elway didn't make huge mistakes earlier in the game. 2. Elway won
 
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure had Favre gotten the ball in OT he would have led the Vikings to victory. Yet, I bet you would still be calling him a choke artist just because of that one INT, huh?

Moreover, Favre did much better against the Saints than Warner did. When Favre got knocked on his ass, he got right back up, and continued to lead the Vikings down the field countless times. What did Warner do? Go to the back, comeback and do absolutely nothing. You know why? Because he isn't half as good or tough as Favre. Fact.

If Favre rebounds and leads a Vikings victory I would credit him.

What the heck are you talking about? How did Warner "go to the back"? He took charge of a team in the Super Bowl, down 14 with 6 minutes to go and tied the game up.

That was the single worst paragraph in the entire thread. I would expect better from you.

Coming from the person who thinks the only time in the game that matters is the last minute, I highly doubt you have the right to call anyone a moron.

Why even bother playing the other 59 minutes?

Because you have to play all 60. Take Favre and his 59 minutes of fame, I'll take Elway and Montana, with their multiple Super Bowls.

:headscratch: So because he proves you wrong he is a moron?, how the fuck does that make any sense at all?!?, face it dude YOU'RE FUCKING WRONG

You are an ignorant ****. You are stuck on repeat. Want to actual explain how "I'm wrong"? You ran like a pussy from the other thread. Grow a sack, scrub.

No that is wrong for reasons. 1. Elway didn't make huge mistakes earlier in the game. 2. Elway won

FACT: Elway threw an INT.
FACT: Kurt Warner won vs TB, which you tried to discredit him for.

Pathetic try.
 
FACT: Elway threw an INT.
FACT: Kurt Warner won vs TB, which you tried to discredit him for.

1. Big difference between a pick and a pick six
2. I'm not even talking about Tampa Bay right now, but that wasn't exactly an Elway-esque drive. There was still 5 minutes left after they scored.
 
1. Big difference between a pick and a pick six
2. I'm not even talking about Tampa Bay right now, but that wasn't exactly an Elway-esque drive. There was still 5 minutes left after they scored.

ACCORDING TO YOU IT DOESN'T MATTER WHEN THEY SCORE.

Man, you are stupid.
 
Damn, Twist.

I would openly agree with your main point if you weren't such a fucking idiot. You have no idea how to formulate an argument at all.
 
What the heck are you talking about? How did Warner "go to the back"? He took charge of a team in the Super Bowl, down 14 with 6 minutes to go and tied the game up.

That was the single worst paragraph in the entire thread. I would expect better from you.

I was talking about the Saints/Cardinals game from a couple of weeks ago. Duh.
 
ACCORDING TO YOU IT DOESN'T MATTER WHEN THEY SCORE.

Man, you are stupid.

It does if you are comparing a game winning drive to Elway's last minute game winning drive against Cleveland. You seem to call a lot of people stupid when you have the reading comprehension of a third grader with dyslexia.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,825
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top