Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Lol you guys would defend Favre if he threw 20 interceptions in a game and then murdered a bus full of children afterwards. You'd blame it on the bus.
You mean the post you made approximately 2 hours after the post of mine you quoted in this thread?It's even sadder when you purposely don't include this part:
Great comeback, where did you learn that, from one of my 7th grade students?But you know, continue working on Favre's balls, I don't think you've properly sucked his right testicle yet.
And people like you find every reason in the world to try and justify your obviously ignorant position that Brett Favre isn't one of the greatest of all time.Lol you guys would defend Favre if he threw 20 interceptions in a game and then murdered a bus full of children afterwards. You'd blame it on the bus.
Please. If you want chokers, point the finger at Adrian Peterson and Percy Harvin.Favre had great teams in 2003, 2007, and 2009, and choked it away each and every time.
I don't even like Favre. The Lions are 0-19 against him in road games. But there is no way Kurt Warner is better then him.
You mean the post you made approximately 2 hours after the post of mine you quoted in this thread?
Just quit. You're embarrassing yourself. The fact is, when I made my post in this thread, you said the loss was Favre's fault.
Great comeback, where did you learn that, from one of my 7th grade students?
And people like you find every reason in the world to try and justify your obviously ignorant position that Brett Favre isn't one of the greatest of all time.
You ignore everything that happened right before and after, and put the blame for the loss squarely on Favre's shoulders, which is just absurd.
Big Sexy demeans Warner for throwing a pick six in the 2nd QTR of a game he led them back in, but defends Favre for choking away seasons.
And notice I never once said Warner was better. Ever.
I quoted the post I was referring to when I made my post in this thread.And I corrected myself. You chose to quote the earlier post, whatever.
Actually, not really. I started about 20 fucking anti-Packer threads. Favre just happens to be the reason I start those threads.It's the fucking truth, you've started atleast twenty fucking Brett Favre threads over the past few months,
See my post right above for the answer to this ridiculousness.Yeah, cause thats what I said right? Did I say Favre wasn't one of the greatest of all time? Nope. He sure as fuck is. He also is a huge choke artist and last night was his biggest choke of all. But keep blaming everyone else except for Favre.
Please. He was trying to force a pass to get his team into position to have a makeable chance at a field goal. If he doesn't complete that pass, then Longwell has a VERY difficult chance of making the FG, thanks to the bonehead 12 men in the huddle penalty. Do you really think a 55 yard FG, in the Saints stadium is a gimme?And then I corrected myself in saying that it's his fault they didn't WIN the game, because he choked. Which he did. Big time. That's what it's called when someone has a huge pressure situation and then makes a big mistake.
Please. If you want chokers, point the finger at Adrian Peterson and Percy Harvin.
Adrian Peterson cost them 7 after the Bush fumble, and Harvin's fumble set up the Saints touchdown that put them at 28. You're telling me an Interception on a play that started from the 38 yard line hurt them more than those two plays?
You're fucking nuts. Did it hurt their chances? Sure. But you're talking about a 55 yard field goal in a hostile environment. Even if Farve tucks the ball and runs he's only going to get to about the 35 yard line, making it a 52 yard field goal. To say that's a "for sure FG" is just ridiculous.
If you want chokers, talk to AP and Harvin.
EDIT: Here's a video highlight of the game. You can find the Favre interception at about 5:02.
You are a fucking idiot. There is no difference between getting tds early and throwing bad picks late, and throwing bad picks early and getting tds late. There is more to a game then the last 2 minutes. It is completely fucking irrelevant as to when qbs throw bad picks. If they lead to a loss then you are partially at fault. Favre was partially at fault yesterday just like Wrner was partially at fault for his last 2 SB losses with the pick sixes he threw. Goddamn you are a ******ed motherfucker.
So, it's okay when AP costs the team the 7 points that would have won them the game, but when Favre throws for over 300 fucking yards, the only thing we care about is the INT which prevented the attempt at a 55 yard FG?Adrian Peterson rebounded and was the key force on their prior TD drive.
They didn't have a chance to win the game in OT? The Defense couldn't have stopped someone? They couldn't have not gotten a pass interference call on what I thought was a poor call, but still was called?Considering after those plays the Vikings had a chance to win the game
So, you know better than EVERY fucking football analyst in the country, almost all of whom have blamed Peterson for not getting his arms open to receive the ball, including Troy Aikman, a Hall of Fame QB?yes it hurt them more than two fumbles earlier in the game, which was actually Favre's fumble. It's the QB's responsibility to make sure the RB has the ball.
Exactly.Welcome to Football for Dummies 101.
Bullshit. You don't sign Brett Favre to let the kicker attempt a 55 yard FG. You sign Brett Favre to make plays and give you the best chance for winning.All you ask for your QB to do is put you in position to win. If Favre does than and Longwell misses he did his job and Longwell didn't. Favre took away the opportunity.
Oh, you called that the Vikings would have 6 fumbles, losing three of them?Thanks for sharing, the feeling of being right and calling it in advance feels great.
Who the fuck said the INT wasn't his fault? Of course it was his fault, no one denied that.You've heard it here everyone, it's not Favre's fault he threw an interception! Nope, not Favre's fault at all. Not like he was the one throwing the fucking ball into the middle of the field directly to the Saints defenders. Nope, not Favre's fault at all. Nothing is ever Brett Favre's fault, he is God.![]()
Brett Favre didn't choke, he was trying to give his kicker the best chance possible. The greats don't play for ties, they play for the win. And him completing that pass would more than likely have gotten them a win, at least a better chance at it then a 50 yard FG.
When Kurt Warner left the field in all 3 Super Bowls he left his team with a shot at victory. Brett Favre leaves the field after throwing INTs in the last game of every season because he can't handle the pressure.
You're a flaming moron if you don't see a difference in leading a TD drive under pressure and leading one in the 1st QTR. I guess Elway's 98 yard drive is immensely overrated because he threw an INT earlier.
It's not my job to educate you on elementary issues.
So, it's okay when AP costs the team the 7 points that would have won them the game, but when Favre throws for over 300 fucking yards, the only thing we care about is the INT which prevented the attempt at a 55 yard FG?
Big Sexy was right. You are a ******ed motherfucker.
They didn't have a chance to win the game in OT? The Defense couldn't have stopped someone? They couldn't have not gotten a pass interference call on what I thought was a poor call, but still was called?
How fucking stupid can you be? It is the same thing.
So, you know better than EVERY fucking football analyst in the country, almost all of whom have blamed Peterson for not getting his arms open to receive the ball, including Troy Aikman, a Hall of Fame QB?
Exactly.
Bullshit. You don't sign Brett Favre to let the kicker attempt a 55 yard FG. You sign Brett Favre to make plays and give you the best chance for winning.
Favre throwing the ball gave the Vikings the best chance for winning. The INT may have prevented the 55 yard FG, but if he completes it, then Longwell's percentages go way up.
Oh, you called that the Vikings would have 6 fumbles, losing three of them?
I most certainly do. In fact, I bet I have a better understanding of it than you do, because I actually understand the things that go into WHY a player "chokes".Apparently you don't know the definition of a choke.
And like I said, I know better than you do what a choke is.You see, when someone is given the chance to help their team in a situation like that, such as Favre being told to get them some yards with a short pass to help them get the field goal, and when they do not succeed in that endeavor and instead TURN THE BALL OVER to the other team, that's called a choke. I seriously have no idea how you could even argue this. High pressure situation and he throws an interception...yep, pretty sure that's called choking. Their loss was a team effort, but Favre choked.
I'm not talking about any interceptions I'm talking about pick sixes that lead directly to points for the other teams. And trust me, Favre has led more comebacks in his career then your dumb ass could count.
It was Warners fault the Birds lost SB 43. He threw a pass to James Harrison right before half time, which led to a pick six... Warners a choke artist.
WHats the difference between that and Favres pass?
Or when Warner fumbled with little or no time left on the clock. He's a choke artist too...