alexikosalov
Dark Match Winner
Internet smarks will go with Punk. They're wrong. Rock's return drew one million buys for WrestleMania... and all he did was host. He's about to have the most hyped WrestleMania main event in at least a decade, so he wins. Punk's moment was awesome, and I loved the speech, but The Rock is big money. Punk isn't near Rock's level, so it didn't make as big of an impact. Rock is a bigger deal, plain and simple.
The question isn't who is the bigger deal. And the answer isn't "the guy who made WWE more money".
If it is, then we can also put to rest the endless "Attitude Era vs. the PG Era" argument, and shut this whole site down today.
WrestleMania buy-rates from the Attitude Era (96-2001):
WrestleMania XII (1996)
Main Event: Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels
1.2 buyrate (480,000 buys)
WrestleMania XIII (1997)
Main Event: Sycho Sid vs. The Undertaker | Bret Hart vs. Steve Austin
0.77 buyrate (308,000 buys)
WrestleMania XIV (1998)
Main Event: Shawn Michaels vs. Steve Austin
2.3 buyrate (920,000 buys)
WrestleMania XV (1999)
Main Event: Steve Austin vs. The Rock
2.32 buyrate (928,000 buys)
WrestleMania XVI (2000)
Main Event: The Rock vs. Triple H vs. The Big Show vs. Mick Foley
2.35 buyrate (940,000 buys)
WrestleMania XVII (2001)
Main Event: Steve Austin vs. The Rock
2.18 buyrate (872,000 buys)
Not one of them over 1 million buys. But Wrestlmania 27 did - during the PG era. Does that mean if smarks say the Attitude Era was THE era in WWE history, would they be wrong?
Mike "The Kid" Killam;3500932 said:The question is simple: now that we're far enough removed from both, which moment stands as THE moment of 2011?
I understand the question to be more about personal reflection than a banking lesson. So I will say CM Punk. First and foremost, he actually wrestles. Secondly, what he did was fresh and new, exciting and edgy. The Rock just does the same things he's always done. Yes, it's fun. But it does not stand out at me as THE moment of the year when I've seen it all before.