The weird thing in this controversy is that in the end it's all about what the fans wants. Indy show are mostly comprise of smart fans that goes to those show because they are trying to recreate the atmosphere that ECW had and are super critical of the WWE style of wrestling, yet when you look at the WWE roster right now, those that are on top of the card are the one that have a safer style of wrestling and know how to make everything mean something.
Indy wrestlers are so preoccupied by putting all their move in their matches that they forget about the psychology of the match and how to tell a good story. All The great ones from Ric Flair and Steamboat to aj styles and Cena knew how to tell a story. Heck even Randy Orton is able to make chicken salad out of chicken shit as proven with the house of horror match which could have been ten times worst that it ended up being.
The fact is that indy wrestling fans really don't care about the wrestlers well being and just want to see flip and dive and super exciting move. The dirst sheets will rated those matches based on how many moves the wrestlers made instead of how well the story was told. So those indy wrestlers pretty much continue with that mentality because that's all they really know.
Also i always found it funny to read when somebody write how wrestler A did earn anything because of how he look or who he knows like if they we're backstage and know everything that happens. That just funny to me because yes some wrestlers got a easier time getting to WWe, but they had to work as hard as anybody else to get we're they are.
Well, to be fair, there are wrestlers out there on the indy scene who do try to tell a story and use psychology during matches. The problem is that in America, most of those guys don't get any real buzz on the indy scene as a lot of the indy fans just want to see flips and high spots. As a whole, the indy scene has devolved into a three ring circus over the last decade or so as it's become more about cramming as high spots, high impact moves and heavily choreographed & cooperative spots as possible into things. Guys who came up on the indy scene 15+ years ago like Styles, Punk & Bryan didn't do 20 super kicks, 20 suicide dives and a dozen flips during their matches. I'm sure that there are some wrestlers on the indy scene that hate that sort of formula but do it because it's really the only way to get noticed.
I think it's too broad of a generalization to imply that all indy fans don't care about the well being of the wrestlers, but I get where you're coming from. It's true that there are a lot of fans, both indy and non-indy, who really don't step back and try to appreciate how much wrestlers put themselves through to entertain them. That's when I look at so many modern indy wrestlers and just sort of cringe at what they put themselves through physically, I appreciate the risks they take and the physical toll it takes on their bodies as a lot of them are doing what they have to do in order to succeed on a much smaller stage in the hopes of being noticed by much bigger stages.
I read an article earlier today in which a writer sort of critiqued Orton's perspective and some I did agree with. For instance, the indy scene has obviously had an impact on WWE; I mean, how could it not when you look at some of the various indy guys who've signed with the company over the last 7 or 8 years. Adding some more impactful stuff and some more flash has also taken place, but nothing to the extreme that we see with the top indy stars like Ospreay, the Young Bucks or Ricochet. The article stated that, in the writer's opinion, that WWE no longer really "developed" talent as they were poached from the indy scene and I disagree with that as there's various stages of developing someone. For instance, Sami Zayn used to do all the crazy spots and all that, but he doesn't any longer. Why? Well, for one thing, he was coached in how to slow himself down, to tell a story and to use psychology inside the ring while cutting back on the big spots so that
A. he didn't burn his body out and
B. those various big spots & moves wouldn't lose their impact with the fans. In my opinion, that's developing a more well rounded pro wrestler.
If someone is into what's termed the "indy style" these days, more power to 'em. I just don't think someone should whine about it whenever someone doesn't have the same opinion and voices it just as they do. I just got through watching the UK Championship special and there were a couple of extremely good matches, especially the main event between Tyler Bate and Mark Andrews. There were some flashy spots and there were a few flips, but there was also storytelling, using psychology, technical wrestling and some good physical ground & pound. Mark Andrews, all 155 lbs. of him, showed during the match that he's a pretty decent mat guy and can actually do more than just flip through the air. To me, it was a great pro wrestling match that had style but said style didn't overshadow substance by any degree.