The Final Poll | Page 15 | WrestleZone Forums

The Final Poll

Who Should Be The Next Mod?

  • The Crock

  • Dagger Dias

  • Coco The Monkey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Normally, I don't engage in "I told you so" posts. I normally don't enjoy being right this much, because I'm pretty used to it. I'm making an exception today. This is sweeter than honey to me.

Gelgarin, just for the record, a portion of my laughter is reserved for you, trying your hardest to be Mr. Big Swinging Forum Dick. Just because someone's using big words, doesn't mean they're trying to confuse you. ;)

I really hope people see why I find this so funny. I'm content to laugh and have people pissed at me for it, but I would like you to at least understand the why of my laughter.

Rayne - you're a bright guy but it didn't take an oracle to predict how this would go. From 1-3-2012.

No, this isn't me dropping out of the race. But for those of you who have been paying attention, it's all too apparent that Dagger is going to win the election and become your next moderator. The ABC has herded cattle much better than anyone here and that will turn into a monumental benefit for Dagger come election time. Crock can't move people like that and I care far less than Dagger does. Say what you will, but the man has passion. So I feel it appropriate to extend an early congrats to Dagger. Good race. You earned it.

I'm sure your name will look good in bold, as the kids like to say to the newly bolded.

Although I was never certain that Dagger would go as far as PMing for votes the only part of Coco's post that I don't agree with is the idea that Dagger cares more. Coco was right.
 
It's strange seeing people say that Dagger's campaigning. In politics, campaigning implies that ideas are being put forward.
Have you watched anything besides the first month of an election? I'm sure some Jew called Moses a ********er while they were trying to figure out who was going to standup to Pharaoh.

Oh, and George, I know. This should have been bluntly obvious to everyone. I'm not claiming superpowers here, I'm claiming powers of the ordinary.
 
Have you watched anything besides the first month of an election? I'm sure some Jew called Moses a ********er while they were trying to figure out who was going to standup to Pharaoh.

What in the blue hell are you talking about?
 
What in the blue hell are you talking about?
Discussing the issues is what you do in the very first part of a campaign. You announce what your platform is, and what you'll do. In America, we drag elections out way the fuck longer than they should go, so after the initial ideas are discussed, all that's left is explaining to people why your opponent is a boogerhead.
 
Darn I thought you had gone for a minute there
Afraid not. It takes a little bit more than one guy I've never talked to, who I have fuck all reason to care about expressing his disapproval to get me to change my behaviors, seeing as they've been working pretty well for me up to this point in my life.

Alternately, come up with better attack and comeback lines, your material isn't exactly the kind of stuff that makes people fumble around awkwardly for words they can't find.
 
I think amazing things can be learned from this.

From now on, I'm kinda sure every election in every place is fixed.
 
Just on a hunch, I'm going to go out on a limb and say BOOMBOOMxKOFFI voted for Dagger. He's the last person to join the forum, but he made an appearance in here. That's a bit fishy.
 
I think amazing things can be learned from this.

From now on, I'm kinda sure every election in every place is fixed.
Something good DID come out of this whole process!!!!! This cynical revelation in one poster validates this whole process.

But to say "fixed" is a stretch. The rules were here for everyone to read at the beginning. Buying votes is the first thing I'd do in an election if I wanted to win, provided I wouldn't go to jail for it. A fixed election would imply that the winner was predetermined in advance.
 
Christian "Minimum Wage" Cage;3669138 said:
Wait, when did you jump ship? I thought you were ABC until you die.
WOLFPAC, MUTHAFUCKA

Originally, when I thought about running myself the ABC party sounded like the best option. Then when I decided it was a terrible idea, due mostly to my lack of time, and large areas in which I can improve as a poster, I stuck around because I didn't know Coco at all and he just came off as a jackass. At that point I started campaigning (ish) for Habs, because it managed to grow the largest party and keep it incredibly organized. His managerial skills are pretty obvious, and he's likely created the least amount of drama possible. When the whole "it doesn't matter who wins, ABC will support them 100%" thing started, I wasn't really open to the idea, but at that point I didn't like Coco and Crock just seemed too "safe".

Turns out I love Coco. Intimately. I don't hate Dagger, and we have had a pretty good, friendly relationship on the forums. He's genuinely a nice guy. Long-story-short, after all the "hate threads", debates, and getting to take a lot of time to know all of the candidates, I honestly think Coco will do a great job. I don't think his trolling about not ever having to do anything is sincere, because I think he gets off on messing with Sly. It's kind of like the "who has the bigger trolling dick" competition between these two. He might be an ass sometimes, but he's also hilarious. Most importantly, by personality alone (not to mention experience and quality of spam posting) he fits in with the mod team like a glove.

[YOUTUBE]3nOxdKcqC_I[/YOUTUBE]

Like a glove.

Note: I realize now that when I made the logo for the ABC Party, I should have put a fail-safe inside, so I could blow it up if it ever turned into SkyNet.
 
Christian "Minimum Wage" Cage;3669306 said:
JoMo_Mark, ProudFlairMark, and a few other have been seen in here. Fishy, no, Crock, clique-y.

Why is it fishy? Anyone can come here and vote. If everytime I clicked new posts and this thread was at the top, I'd surely click on it.
 
Discussing the issues is what you do in the very first part of a campaign. You announce what your platform is, and what you'll do.

Dagger did that. He was roundly criticised, on account of his ideas being stupid.

In America, we drag elections out way the fuck longer than they should go, so after the initial ideas are discussed, all that's left is explaining to people why your opponent is a boogerhead.

Yeah, Dagger hasn't done that. In the past few weeks, he hasn't put forward idea, he hasn't criticised his opponents and he's barely defended himself. He's kept his head down and messaged lots of lesser known members, promising them rep for votes.
 
Something good DID come out of this whole process!!!!! This cynical revelation in one poster validates this whole process.

But to say "fixed" is a stretch. The rules were here for everyone to read at the beginning. Buying votes is the first thing I'd do in an election if I wanted to win, provided I wouldn't go to jail for it. A fixed election would imply that the winner was predetermined in advance.


I didn't mean this one is fixed, but I meant for example in a presidential election, they're never gonna let DD of politics get elected, so they whether fix it or try their hardest to not let it happen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top