Bullshit. There was no question in your statement. It wasn't ''could you determine the intelligence from those posts" and you fucking know it. You said it was a direct example of someone's fucking intelligence. Do I have to post the fucking quote again. You fucking said that the context in which certain words were being spoken in there was ignorant and showed a lack of intelligence. If you didn't believe this to be true why would have made any comment of that nature in the first initially? This isn't me a problem of me understanding anything. I understand what you said originally and the all of your following attempts to try and reroute the comments your made.
Honestly, at first I thought you were feigning stupidity in order to be annoying and to force me to repeat myself, but now it's clear you really are this dense. I
did say that you can gauge someones intelligence by the words they use in combination with the context, I stand by that. However I was speaking in general, that comment wasn't directed at people posting in the Cage. Why wasn't it directed at those people? Because it's difficult to determine the context in which any one of those people say those words. Do I think the posts are stupid? Yes. Do I think the
posters are stupid? They might be, I don't know, I cannot tell.
Here are some links to reading comprehension strategies. This might help you not be a fucking idiot in the future:
http://www.rhlschool.com/reading.htm
http://www.readingcomprehensionconnection.com/reading_lesson.php
Being smart enough to post it in the bar room? Sounds like you're saying that the people that choose to post in there aren't smart enough to post it in here.
No, what I was saying is that you aren't going to get a serious discussion in the Cage. If you want to seriously discuss the topic, you would be smart to post the thread elsewhere.
Seriously what the fuck am I missing. You said that judging the context in which people speak is an acceptable way to judge people's intelligence. Literally, it's right fucking there. Clearly you had enough context to state that the cage is full of ignorant language because you have been so kind to point out the obvious. So you can't bullshit your way out of what you've said by now saying that you don't have enough context to judge people from. You have insinuated that because of posts made there that either collectively or personally posters that have done so are of less intelligence than you because you haven't done as such. I call you a whiner because the CONTEXT in which that particular section operates. It's fucking password protected and they rules are clearly stated at the top of the fucking page. When you enter that password and enter the thread you give up all rights to bitch or judge.
The context is the set of circumstances surrounding the post. If a poster in the Cage posters NWord, I cannot tell if they are genuinely racist, or just saying the word because it's no longer off-limits. If I am talking to a friend and he's referring to some black persons as NWord's, then I know the context and I can determine that he's ignorant.
I said that the collective IQ of the posts have dropped, not the posters, and I was very clear to make that point. Considering the Cage allows every thing except pornography, I am perfectly within the right to give my opinion on the quality of posts.
I called you a whiner for a good fucking reason which I listed above. You call me an insecure bully because you didn't know shit about the situation you are talking about. Unless you can see the 2 red reps he had given me before I had ever talked to him then you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Apparently I'm some sort of forum dick that goes around picking on people and acting like a tough ass despite that no more than a week ago I was pouring my heart out about being dumped and saying all of personal shit that many here wouldn't feel comfortable doing. Yeah Salv I totally care about looking like a tough ass.
What a great argument, you pass judgment and you're right for doing so, but I pass judgment and I'm wrong for doing so (the context of that last post was sarcasm by the way, I'm not sure if you would have caught that). I called you a person so insecure that they perpetuate the image of a tough-guy, and from what I have seen I am fine with that conclusion. The fact that you poured your heart out just shows you're inconsistent.