Hi CH!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wait. You think of me as Heyman? Great mind. But never really interested me that much. Whenever he'd shoot on Vince or for any given time at One Night Stand he seemed more like a cry baby. I liked Bischoff better. But that'd be an overrated comparison.
Sure I don't discredit him as a brilliant mind. But financially he wasn't perfect. Nor was he really that interesting. He never managed to truly go mainstream. And quite frankly I think going mainstream with the stuff he had going on wouldn't have been too big a success either. I never thought highly of ECW. I thought it was garbage like.
He was great on-screen yes. Great on the microphone and all. I liked his shoots, even if they came off as cry baby like because of the "YOU COPIED ME VINCE" shit and bashing Bischoff.
I've always loved Bischoff, my favorite General Manager of all time. Great heel and it showed whenever he was on-screen. Second greatest non wrestling character second to Vince McMahon.
Not much man. I get the weekend off from classes and mission so I am hanging out at a coffee shop on my kindle, writing down SCW ideas in a notebok. Relaxing.
Lucky. Hope you have fun. Say hi to Bryan Danielson during his surprise unplanned appearence for me![]()
True. Then again, I just consider it answer to the times. The 90's went on a whole different direction (especially the late 90's), and Heyman saw his chance to put up something on the table. Granted, he sucked (probably still sucks) at the finance aspect, but his booking was solid all around. I think X can give a better perspective on this one rather than me![]()
Somehow, I didn't see them as crybaby. I just saw him as "holy shit, did you really give him a microphone on a ppv?" type deal. I even loved the put downs he gave to all of them. "MATT FREAKIN' HARDY." comes to mind.
This is true too. He played the GM heel role to perfection. Somehow, between him and Regal, the GM role was pretty much a solid part for them. Those guys were examples of how a heel authority/mouthpiece should be played.
X probably would yes. I wasn't a fan around that time. But I watched some stuff on youtube and dailymotion (As I've been sure to spread the fact about so that people know how I got knowledge from before 2009). And the product he put forth looked awful at times. The crowd is too damn devoted to that promotion that it's scary.
Yeah I lol'd at Matt Freakin' Hardy "Hide your wifes" and all that. He does put on decent promos. RVD put on a decent promo at that show as well (This is a night where RVD doesn't have a vocabulary limited to cool and dude).
Regal was a great general manager as well. Should've been on Smackdown though instead of Long.
Well, again, it was a huge change from WCW and WWE. And the crowd followed it like a cult, and it made splashes everywhere. It's where Steve Austin took his steps and started to shape the Austin 3:16 character, as well as Jericho, Guerrero, Mysterio, Benoit and Foley had their stints there that made them springboard to bigger and better things. Granted, it had his awful as fuck moments (Mass Transit, the crucifixion, etc.) But it was just something that stemmed from that. And the crowd got so devoted, some years after its defunct, it quickly rose back up the second Vince made a ppv about it.
I really don't whether it was the ppv itself or the atmosphere, but it just gave a real different setting. RVD cut a decent promo, and Heyman just gave the fans what they wanted when he shot on the Crusaders.
I agree with that. Somehow, having a heel GM just gives a better role to play with from the superstars. Look at Vickie, for example. But it would have been good if there was one heel GM and one face GM. But when the chance was there, Regal would have dominated the Smackdown GM role.
And that's why I facepalm the fans. It wasn't a big deal except a bit different production. It didn't have nearly the same crowds that WCW and WWE had. If it had been able to challenge the two companies. Then i would've called it worthy. But it didn't.
And worthy or not. It was still an awful product. The fans were still way too devoted. I mean did you see the video about fans throwing multiple chairs in the ring? Covering the talents?
I'm still not sure what the Crusaders are.
The RVD promo was dull. But it was still different. RVD is just boring overall except for in the ring. And even there I don't find him that interesting.
The promo that did the most to me was Austin nearing the end. As Taz walked to the ring. I marked out for Taz as arguably the only talent I have ever cared remotely about from ECW.
An authority figure is always supposed to be the bad guy. Sure it's stereotyping the moniker because there certainly aren't all bad authority figures and bosses. But it is definitely the one thing that was put forth as the first thing in WWE and WCW.
The General Manager has always been a heel. With exception of Teddy and Tiffany. And let's be honest, Teddy is boring. And the only time I remotely cared about Tiffany was when she bend over in Playboy.
No. I heard things about the "bring your own weapon" match, where the fans brought household items. It's the match where Foley smacked the shit out of Sabu(I can't recall if it was him) with a cast iron pan. The thing is, I doubt it could have gone any higher than what it was when Heyman took full control. If it were someone else taking charge of the numbers, then it could have gone bigger since, again, rabid throngs of fans took to the change and ran with it.
Of course, what little rope was given to fans was just used to hang everyone involved at times, it was something that made the fans interact. Some consider some of the storylines brutal, others extreme (I'll take them both, I'm hardcore!) but it wasn't something that revolved around the company. It just played the things that WCW and WWE haven't touched (HIAC, the hardcore matches, etc.) stemmed from the things that ECW did. In part, ECW is a source of what to do, and more importantly, what not to do in an upcoming promotion.
This is exactly the same thing that will probably happen in TNA if they're not careful. They're even starting to be getting the stigmata of "E-C-Dub" chants. hell, they're the "WWE Recycle Bin and WCW rehash" already, so one more thing to be compared to isn't the best of attributes for them.
Bischoff and JBL and their merry band of WWE guys, that appeared in ONS '05
I can give you this. RVD just needs someone to have a good back and forth with. He's got the tools, but somehow, I can't picture him being nothing that a recurrent mid card guy that can play at the main event at times (much less build a company's direction around him, like in TNA)
I'm very meh towards Taz. Somehow, I prefer him behind the commentary table. Reminds me of Early shades of King. But in the ring, he wasn't half bad at all. And you know damn well that Austin is just solid on a mic every time.
But there comes a point where you need to switch it up. Like you said, not all bosses are bad, as with the fact that not all bosses are good. For every Regal/Bischoff, there's a Foley/Long to counterbalance.
Long..I can get it. Partly, it's because of what I think of the face/heel interaction on a GM role on a show.
Tiffany was actually fitted for the WWECW GM role. Note that it contained a Youth Movement vibe to it, and to me, it made sense that Tiffany be there. Somehow, it was a role that could have made another person other than her, but still, it's something to point out. Would have been badass if Abraham Washington took the job, or someone else that could rock the mic well.
Wasn't aware of that. I just saw the video. And the talent was covered in chairs. Even the ones that were standing got covered. That's rather dangerous more than anything. Throwing a steel chair at someone who usually works around hurting the opponent. It's hard to evade 10 chairs at the time.
Sure I take the hat off for the fan interaction. But there's also a line where you draw how much interaction they have. How much they can truly decide. Trust me, to me it came off as if Paul booked ECW to please the fans. Not for the better product of it.
The same goes for John Cena at One Night Stand 2006. I was damn happy Vince booked RVD to win. Because the building would've been torn to SHREDS.
And don't get me wrong on crediting ECW for a lot of storylines. But it's obvious Vince went on and made them better. Vince has copied a lot of storylines and improved them. Look at Evolution. By far my favorite stable ever, copied from Four Horsemen. Stone Cold in ECW vs WWE. And many other things.
Exactly. Mark Madden had it right on the fucking head "E.C.W" congratulations Dixie, the fans are chanting for a WWE owned product. congratulations. I would green rep Mark Madden if he had made a thread on here about it and not a editorial.
Thank you for clearing that up. Crusaders is an odd word for it though.
Sure he's good at getting a decent match out of you. There's no denying that. But it doesn't make him any more or less interesting for me. I remain to be a fan of the grappling style in Benoit, Guerrero, Triple H, Flair, Jericho, Shawn and Bret.
I liked Taz. And I liked him quite a lot from what I saw of him on Youtube and such. I loved the suplex machine thing. I am 3rd degree mark for suplexes.
And the promo by Austin was great because it basically had a lot of shooting in it. Without being bashing towards WWE. I don't like how just because they're allowed to shoot, that they bash the product that has given them such paychecks and shelter, safety and all that for so long.
Foley, yes I forgot about him. Didn't care about him either.
Sure she was decent, but I never cared for her. Eric and Stephanie are my favorites. At least they were interesting heels with a general manager like knowledge. To counter "Heyman did too" he was never truly an on-screen character.
Say what now? Dude was badass in 2000 as the 'Commish. His segments wit hE&C were brilliant.
Ideally, there isn't a difference.Trust me, to me it came off as if Paul booked ECW to please the fans. Not for the better product of it.
Well, that's rather nutless. Gonna let the fans intimidate one into a booking decision?The same goes for John Cena at One Night Stand 2006. I was damn happy Vince booked RVD to win. Because the building would've been torn to SHREDS.
Your standards for "grappling style" are utter horse shit.Sure he's good at getting a decent match out of you. There's no denying that. But it doesn't make him any more or less interesting for me. I remain to be a fan of the grappling style in Benoit, Guerrero, Triple H, Flair, Jericho, Shawn and Bret.
It's what people want to hear and it keeps paycheques rolling in. When you grow up, learn to be appropriately cynical about the wrestling business, and realize that things like "respect" are non-entities and are most often called upon by people who show none themself, then you'll see that such bashing isn't as huge of a deal as you make it out to be.And the promo by Austin was great because it basically had a lot of shooting in it. Without being bashing towards WWE. I don't like how just because they're allowed to shoot, that they bash the product that has given them such paychecks and shelter, safety and all that for so long.
Most of the people who modern fans consider grapplers are, at their core, spot monkies to the same degree as anyone else in the business.I'm a fan of flippies and grappling myself. Spot monkeys always have a spot on my heart, and I will forever mark out to a Hat Trick.
Yeah, I doubt the video leaked, and besides, it wouldn't be seen very well since it took place in the stands. But yeah, it's a very infamous moment, and it got shed bad rep on the fans since Foley thought it was planted, and went full force with, He said that the thing that let him in on the fact it was real was the sound it made when it hit.
Well, mainly it was,but in a sense, Heyman must have seen that, in your terms, the better product, was probably placed in the hands of the fans. It did good, but again, what rope was sent to them was basically out to choke them with it.
Goes to show, ECW's got a real loyal following. I bet it was a dream to book at times when shit wasn't hitting the fan so much. You got to admit, it's storylines weren't exactly the norm, which brings me to my main topic: It was a huge alternative in a small promotion.
Say what, now?
Thing is, people actually hate on him for calling TNA on its faults. Madden's loud, he's a natural heel (real natural), but he said it best. Dixie's a money mark. Again, they should watch "Rise and Fall of ECW" sometime. Better yet, disassociate with ECDub entirely. Otherwise, McMahon will basically nail them on the head for lulz.
I've heard worse.
I'm a fan of flippies and grappling myself. Spot monkeys always have a spot on my heart, and I will forever mark out to a Hat Trick. But, grappling doesn't always grab the attention of people at times. I tend to favor all those guys, plus Morrison (see that, Norcs??) Miz, Kofi, Jeff, etc.
Just to point this out, I don't consider Trips a Grappler. He's more of a Brawler that can Grapple, given his training with Kowalski.
True. But now, it's something I just see in Samoa Joe, but with a different approach (submission machine). But Taz could work, no doubt about it.
Here's the rub: They mangled the hand that fed them. But, if it were something that was truly out of control, the 'E was in full position to cut the feed, and face the ire of the following that watched it on Television. I doubt it was something that got out of control or anything. It was just a shoot that fell in favor of the fans.
Say what now? Dude was badass in 2000 as the 'Commish. His segments wit hE&C were brilliant.
Well, Heyman was a mouthpiece to Lesnar, a commentator with JR, and hung around as part of the Alliance (Lulz). Whatever chance he had as a on-screen character, he took it, and ran far with it. I'm not discrediting you, I just want you to consider the fact that he did have roles on screen.
As for Stephanie, she did great, but was better at being a Valet.