I think absolutely. I think the biggest concern would be his physical ability to do what made him famous (which is just being pretty crazy). TNA has a much lighter schedule, and that would be a huge plus for a guy like Jeff. I agree with another post that he's a bigger draw in 2010 than Hogan would be in 2010, and the big reason is that the medium changed. The aimed age that WWE goes for were infants or not even born when Hogan was doing his nWo stint. They're the fans of Jeff Hardy. Personally, I feel there's not much overlap in viewership from WWE to TNA. I don't think the kids who watch WWE are watching TNA, and if older people still watch wrestling, they're equally likely to watch both. I kind of see it like from 5 - 13ish is WWE, then it starts to get to "childish", and you can switch to TNA, which is on Spike, the "Man" channel, and doesn't cater to younger people, so it feels more mature. Jeff Hardy can be that link that TNA should aim for to bring those WWE fans who have started growing out of the slapstick humor of midget-beats-small-mexican and glow sticks into a new promotion. This kinda ties in with the January Monday Night Skirmish that's going to happen. I don't think either ratings are going to change too much because they're aiming at different things. I know I'll be jumping back and forth, but a lot of the kids that tune into WWE won't be (I know if I were younger today, my mom would've blocked Spike). Jeff is the one available superstar that the young kids connected to like they did with Hogan (who for his entire career were banking off the fans that he first had in the 80s, who grew up and went with him to WCW)