WWE does not have good bookers whatsoever. I've know what these woman can do in the ring.
And you claim to be a better booker than the people that work for WWE? Why don't you go get a job with WWE then, back up your words.
They are booked very well at house shows.
Everyone looks better at house shows, WWE doesn't enforce the move ban during house shows, nor do they focus on cheesy gimmick matches and 30 minute promos.
WWE doesn't broadcast house shows, and you don't get much watching 15 second videos on Youtube, shot by a crappy phone cam
They are given ample time and during that time they can take things more easily and put on a technical match. Unlike on RAW, how they're booked to run into the ring for 2 minutes and throw a couple moves around.
Which is why Mark Henry and Khali look more impressive at house shows then they do during the live product
So basically you're saying that Mickie, Jillian, Beth, Victoria and the other wonder bunch aren't good wrestlers? You did say that they don't have good talent or at least that's how it came off.
When did I say this? I think you might be confusing wrestling technique to workmanship. I Said Candice was both a weak wrestler and a weak worker, and I said Trish was a phenomenal worker.
Trish's first feuds were very mediocre. Nothing special. Much like Beth vs. Candice, Trish vs. Jazz was basically about Trish trying to overcome the odds.
No, Trish vs Jazz was Trish trying to overcome the odds of a superior wrestler in Jazz, Jazz was pushed over Trish as fans immediately saw Jazz from the moment she debuted, as a serious threat to Stratus. Trish had to work to get the momentum that Jazz had received from the fans back on her side, the turning piont in the feud was when Trish finally got the better of Jazz a sent her reeling right before a title match, Trish Showed the fans that she could be as tough as Jazz. In the Candice vs Beth Feud, Candice was pushed over Beth to the point where Beth, the "superior wrestler", was backed into the 'Can I beat Candice?' corner, which actually tipped part of the momentum that Candice had in the feud in Beth's favor.
Molly vs. Trish was about Molly turning heel and wanting the title.
It was much more than wanting the title, she wanted Trish's popularity as well, this was the factor that internally fueled there feud.
Of course some jokes were thrown in about Molly's backside but it wasn't the most exciting thing ever. The wrestling was good but that's because of Molly.
And the matches where good because of Trish, she could out sell Molly, she could work a crowd better than molly could, Trish displayed better use of Ring Psychology and picking spots than Molly. Molly may have had the better in ring skill but Trish was by far the better worker
It wasn't until Victoria came in that a women's title feud became something good.
See Trish vs Molly, except Victoria wasn't jealous pf Trish, she wanted to destroy Trish, that was what made the feud interesting.
But that's because Victoria had a good character, something which RAW can do, but again their bookers suck and choose not to.
And again, the bookers on Raw aren't bad, clearly there not especially with the work they do with the main event, the talent in the womens division is just at an all time low right now.
If WWE actually booked their champions in good feuds, people would see things differently.
How can the WWE have good feuds when most of the women currently being pushed aren't even that good?
Candice just being booked to watch squash matches backstage, like she did during basically the whole first part of the feud, won't get her anywhere. But considering the way she was booked, she did good.
But not anything above average and certainly not anything near Trish's level
Trish was able to showcase her improvements week after week on RAW. Not just on PPV or houseshows like Candice. It wasn't until after Beth won the title that Candice was getting back into singles matches, etc.
That shows There's simply not enough talent in the womens division to go around. Most of the talent now is either divided up among the mens division doing promos with them (IE Maria, Lita at the end of her career) or most of the talent in the womens division aren't simply good enough for live TV most of the time (IE Ashley) and the remainder of the women aren't even being used or pushed (IE Melina, Jillian) So it makes since for WWE to not have the champion on TV each week in a singles match, to build up the challenger. Even though when Candice was champion she did do alot of promos and quite a few tag matches.
Now that there is some spice added to Beth and Candice's feud, it might be alot better. Promos, matches with actual story to them, interferences, etc.
Lets hope so, Candice has really yet to have a decent feud (same could be said for Beth) so it'll be a win - win for both these gals
Most women's title WM feud are booked greatly. Hell Ashley vs. Melina was a terrible match but the build up was good. Cannot deny that.
No I can't deny it, but the actual match turned out to be so shitty that all the previous booking just felt like a big waste of time. Just look at the Brock vs Goldberg feud.
So if WWE still has plans of pushing Beth vs. Candice into Mania then I see no reason as to why it shouldn't deliver.
well if the match sucks, it won't deliver, and since Candice was mediocre before her injury, I don't see why Candice wouldn't still be mediocre after her injury
To know Candice has still gotten better, look at her first match with Melina (not the B&P one, the one from the 5-21 RAW) and compare it to their GAB and Heat matches. The two obviously put on better matches thus meaning Candice learned more.
Kelly obviously learned more and has improved with the match she recently had against Victoria, but does that automatically make Kelly a solid wrestler and worker? No. Candice has shown that she can do the basics, but she hasn't been consistent enough with any of her matches in any of her feuds to show that she is making the leap form an average wrestler to a great wrestler. Its only when she does this that Candice can start moving up the ladder of improvement.
Another note about terrible booking in the WWE, is that Mickie vs. Beth could've been a great feud but it was booked so crappy that we got a good match with absolutely NO response at all. Then they continue it and it's just as bad. Seems like a random, boring feud, which could've been fixed by booking.
Hmm... Beth broke her jaw right before Beth and Mickie were supposed to have met the first time, I don't see how thats bad booking? The second time Beth was in a heated feud with Candice, Candice was injured, and without the bread and butter of the feud, the bookers stuck Mickie in as Candice's quick replacement. And again it can go back to the lack of good talent in the womens division, If WWE had with them another face womens wrestler, with decent in ring skills and was a skilled worker, that could have faced Beth instead after Candice was injured, I'm sure the bookers would have used her instead of Mickie, but the sad fact was that Mickie was the only choice at the time.
