NFL Draft 2010

I'll say Arizona is the last option for Clausen in the first, outside of someone moving up. If the Vikes pick Clausen, I'd take it as a big indicator Farve isn't coming back/they have little faith in him being around all season since people saw how to get to Farve last year.
 
Awesome pick for Bronco's. They have people to hold them at QB for a couple years, and Tebow will be starting in 2 years, and be a Pro Bowler.
 
What was his point? I got tired of hearing Kiper and preferred Mayock.

He said that Tebow is a good pick to have on the team and he doesn't have to be a QB. He's a good football player and person, just maybe not a good QB. Denver picked him because he's a good player, not a good QB but that would be a nice bonus.
 
Question. What does Mel Kiper know about Quarterbacking? Gruden knows Offense (and QB), and he loves him. Kiper knows shit, and he hates him.
 
DUDE. Last night Cartman was told he was part Denver Bronco. Tim Tebow is now a Denver Bronco. Eric Cartman is the same as Tim Tebow!
 
Becker, I thought Denver didn't need a quarterback??

Haha... dude, you can't put anything fucking faith in Orton and Quinn. This was a very smart move, though I still say they should have gone with Jimmy Clausen. Still a gutsy move though and I love it.
 
Question. What does Mel Kiper know about Quarterbacking? Gruden knows Offense (and QB), and he loves him. Kiper knows shit, and he hates him.

This is why I can't stand McShay or Kiper. They have never put on a helmet but they're "experts". You know who are experts? Guys like Steve Young and John Gruden. They have Super Bowl rings on their fingers. They might be wrong, but they have credentials. I have never heard a reason to listen to either of the "draft gurus."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,824
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top