Actually, I do. But I wouldn't expect you to believe some of the things I can put in my resume. Ask around the forum... they'll tell you.
You're right, I don't. And asking around an internet forum isn't really proof for me, thanks.
He tripped over himself?? Where? The guy cut a seamless promo as a borderline shoot that lasted over five straight minutes in one straight camera cut from the locker room area out to the arena, barely stumbling on any of his words. And that's overrated? You try it sometime.
You just said "barely stumbling on any of his words", meaning he stumbled over some words, which is exactly what I said. Thanks for asking where and then agreeing with what I said in the next breath.
And I'm not a professional wrestler, nor do I claim or try to be.
Oh, ok. So we're going to play the game where you ask for something, I give you proof, and you give an opinion and say "No" without backing it up with proof of your own. Yeah, I haven't been to this rodeo before.
You haven't given me ANY proof! You posted something and said this is why my opinion is so, that's not proof. That's you giving an example to go along with your OPINION. Maybe that works on high schoolers, but it doesn't work on me.
You're right. So the thousands of people that say his "Because I'm the Miz and I'm awesome" catchphrase along with him aren't a part of his draw? I guess the next thing you're going to tell me is that the Rock wasn't a draw, either. Dude, go away.
Then by your example R-Truth must be a huge draw, too. Everyone sings along with his catchphrases and his entrance music. Santino must be a huge draw, too. Nice try. I'm talking about a DRAW, and you haven't proven a thing towards proving Miz is any kind of draw. Just because you're popular and they give you the championship doesn't mean you can actually draw money or draw ratings. You comparing the Miz to the Rock is a joke, as Rock broke attendance records. He's one of the highest draws in wrestling history based on individual numbers.
How about you DISprove it. Or prove SOMETHING. Oh, that's right... you can't. At least I posted anything I had to back up my claim. Your bullshit "No, you're wrong" answers do nothing but show your lack of any contribution to this debate.
You're asking me to disprove OPINION. You're entitled to your opinion, but stop acting like it's FACT. It's not. Once again, you posting a video of Miz cutting a promo and pretending that's prove of him being the best on the mic in the entire company isn't actually fact. That's you posting a video and still voicing your opinion, as dozens of people can watch that promo and disagree with you and have their own opinion that that wasn't the case. CM Punk owns Miz on the mic, and I don't need to post videos as proof, wrestling fans have watched both of them all year.
Who told you that, your good buddy Arn Anderson? Mark Madden? The tooth fairy?
No, that's based off my opinion. But if you're saying the Miz is as good on the mic as past stars like Arn Anderson, Roddy Piper, Jake Roberts, Ric Flair, Mick Foley, and the list goes on.. you're full of shit.
Go watch every match he's been in, please. Nowhere is his in ring ability anything but above average.
Not memorable in your mind, maybe. I remember his great work with Daniel Bryan, MVP, John Morrison, his matches with John Cena, his work when he was tag champ with the Big Show, multiple matches with Kofi Kingston on Raw... should I go on? I'm waiting for you to cite a match... or anything for that matter... to back up your side of this.
You're clearly a huge Miz mark so your opinion is rather biased when it comes to Miz's past matches and his feuds. I remember absolutely nothing memorable in terms of his matches or his feuds. That's not because I dislike the Miz, because I don't dislike the Miz, I just am not about to overrate his talent.
And I don't need to cite a match, because I'm citing them all. There's not one match that Miz has been in that's memorable to me for Miz's part in the match. Even in Money in the Bank where he WON he was just kind of there and overshadowed by others.
Except hold it for a total of 321 days between 2009 and 2010.
So what? I can name dozens of wrestlers who've held either the Intercontinental or United States championships for rather lengthy reigns. That doesn't mean they DID anything with the championship. Miz barely defended it, he just carried it around with him to prove he was a champion. He didn't do a thing with the title, didn't have any great US title matches, nor even have any great feuds based AROUND the US title. So what's your point?
I never told you that you should or shouldn't like him. All I did was prove that your claims about him being mediocre in the ring and on the mic were totally wrong. Your opinion is yours and I could give two shits how you FEEL about him. But don't discard his accomplishments and talent just because your opinion of him is bad.
I NEVER claimed he was mediocre at all, tool. You're debating and trying to disprove things that weren't even said in the first place.

I said he was overrated, that doesn't mean he's mediocre. That means he's not as good as people give him credit for being. He's good on the mic, he's average in the ring, he's certainly a better "character" then some on the roster, but that still doesn't prove he's a draw nor does it prove he's a credible champion. I don't care about behind the scenes stuff, or how loyal or how much effort he puts in outside the ring, that doesn't determine whether the Miz has the talent or is credible in the role of WWE champion. As the TOP guy.
You're entitled to think he is, but I and I'm certainly not alone, don't agree. You can't prove me wrong because there's no facts yet claiming otherwise. The only facts that will prove otherwise is his reign as champion now that's he's been given the ball.
Hell, I personally can't stand John Cena for all of the reasons you listed. But I can't take away the fact that he is a tremendous asset to the WWE and professional wrestling as a form of entertainment.
What's your point? I'm not saying Miz doesn't have talent, or he isn't an asset to the WWE. That still doesn't mean he's a good choice as the champion, which was my point in the beginning.
This is a wrestling forum! Everything is opinion. Everything you've said is your opinion, and you trying to claim otherwise is laughable.
I think I've heard enough. You don't like the Miz. Yippy. But if you would take a minute to pull your head out of your ass and give me some VALID reasons why your claims about his lack of skills then maybe I might respect your opinion. As of now, I don't. Not in the slightest.
I've given lots of valid reasons why I don't think he's a good choice as champion and why I feel he's overrated. Just because you're a Miz mark and you don't agree with them doesn't make them any less valid you arrogant prick. They're just as valid as your OPINIONS on why the Miz is so good.
Gee, you've got me all figured out. Turn the mirror onto yourself and see if it looks similar. You're a hypocrite with nothing but a leaky mouth. Take your own advice, Jack.[/QUOTE]