Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Notice how all of his opponents are well able to carry him?
Wonder why that is..
Sorry, but he's not "damn entertaining", in fact, he's quite boring and bland, damn, I've never seen a generic looking wrestler being cocky.
I can name multiple, The Miz botching the Figure Four, botching the RKO spot, botching MULTIPLE and MULTIPLE and MULTIPLE lines of his promos, for someone who is "the greatest in WWE on mic work", he sure does make a shit-ton and a half of mic botches.
TNA has a history of putting the wrong belt on the wrong people, Miz isn't ready for the main-event level yet, not even close, that's what I was referring to.
Sorry, but they all just look so weak.
How is a full-nelson facebuster supposed to be taken seriously by a guy the size of The Miz?
To [CL]:
You did a nice job of quoting Roddy Piper's promo from a week ago. Ricky Steamboat, Ted DiBiase, and Jerry Lawler all spend lots of time backstage in the WWE. Do you think they're angry and bitter about a guy who has been shown to work his ass off and loves the business being given a title run? Probably not. I'd say they're happy for Miz. These legends most likely share a completely opposite view that you do. A person willing to give up watching wrestling because of this probably would not garner too much respect from the legends you mentioned...
It takes two to make a match. I just named a few matches that he's performed well in, including an undercard match with Primo! I could name more, but you've yet to point out a BAD match he's had.
If you consider having "charisma to burn" and being a "master on the mic" as being generic, then I guess you're right. I couldnt STAND the guy when he first came into WWE, and he's proven me wrong, over and over. Part of what makes his promos and mic work so special is that it's partially birthed in reality. He's a feel good story, and still pulls off being a captivating heel. Boring and bland indeed......
He didn't botch the figure four, he just didn't do it with the precision of Ric Flair. Not many have. And the "RKO" spot you're talking about is called being "out of position", not botching a move. That has NOTHING to do with ones wrestling skill, and everything to do with timing.
And Im quite sure Ive never heard of mic-botching, thats quite the new one to me..... The man has charisma, to burn. His promos are consistently among the best in the company, and are very entertaining.
Well, it would have been nice to actually make your point clear in your OP, right? Who else have they put belts on undeservingly? Cena? Orton? Kane? Sheamus? Jericho? There's five of your more recent champs.
Anyway, he is READY for the belt, in the same way that Cena was in 2005. He's an above-average wrestler whose progresing more and more in the ring all the time. He's been ready for awhile, and WWE pulled the switch in a great way.
That's a matter of opinion, not of fact. Obviously there's a lot of people that disagree, especially those within WWE, since he is the WWE champion and all. The move does look sick and lethal because of the aggressiveness of which he uses. He's 230 lbs, where Mysterio goes 175. That's 55 lbs of weight. Making the comparison between a Mysterio bulldog and a Miz facebuster just doesn't hold water. He's been a star since the day he stepped on Raw, and has grown ever since. I think he'll make for quite the nice champion.
[cL];2615269 said:The Miz? Really? I fault Vince MacMahon for this atrocity.
How can Vince sit in his office and know the value of the world heavyweight title and how many great wrestlers who fought and scraped, bled and sweat to gain some of the most notable careers in wrestling history who never won the world title..how can he know people like Ricky Steamboat, Ted Dibiase and Jerry Lawler for heavens sakes and HAVE KNOWN greats like Rick Rude, and Mr. Perfect...knowing that THESE men paved the way for the wrestlers of today without ever having won a World Title and simply with no thought of the past and what the World Title really means, hand it to the Miz? the Miz deserves the world title but Mr. Perfect didn't? The Miz has good enough ring work that he can strap on the belt but Ricky Steamboat didn't? The Miz's mic work was so phenomenal that he gets a title run but Roddy Piper's wasn't? When you put into perspective what the World Title meant and what it means now, it takes the desire to watch wrestling completely away from me. Screw Cena screwing Orton. PUTTING THE BELT ON THE MIZ is a B-SLAP TO THE FACE OF EVERY LEGEND WHO HELD THE BELT AND EVERY LEGEND WHO SHOULD HAVE. and THATS the bottom line. WWE lost a fan. Period.
What I think you have to accept is that there are now two world championships in the WWE. Therefore, they obviously mean a lot less than they used to. Now I'm a tad too young to remember Backlund winning the title but I was drawn in during the attitude era. The title certainly meant more back then as it did in the 80's and prior. Now I'm not saying this is a good thing but when the brands split the titles were watered down. The elite prestige of holding a title was also watered down with it. I honestly don't even think you can compare being a world champion in today's company with being a champion in the past. The titles guys are holding today have the same names but let's face it, it's not the same as when Backlund, Hogan, Michaels, Hart, Austin, etc. held it. Therefore, there are going to be more mid-cardesque (new word) wrestlers to hold world titles. It may not be like the good old days but that's the way the business is going.[cL];2615382 said:Touche.
Maybe I wouldn't garner a lot of respect from the "boys in the back". Maybe they'd regard me as a quitter. Or. Maybe, just maybe secretly they're saying to themselves, what the hell? Maybe, like me, they're wondering what more they could've done in the back office to gain that number one spot. Maybe their sitting on their hands not saying a word cause Vince is still cutting that check. Who knows. Nobody knows. I am just a man who remembers when Bob Backlund won the world title. I remember what it meant to be the World Heavyweight Champion. Not all this MITB get a shot whenever you want it crap that allows someone to win it on a whim. I mean you gotta keep it interesting so whatever, but all i'm saying is that WWE isn't what it used to be.
Also, i'm not a frequent complainer on these threads. I haven't had much to say at all. I do read the columns a lot and the different threads so I don't do a lot of complaining or posting. This is the first time I've ever really had something to piss and moan about. So i am. Sue me.
Do I think the Miz puts on an impressive show in the back to gain his spot. Yup. will it matter to WWE? nope.
So, like you said if you don't like it don't watch?
Ok.
I won't.
I'm not giving up watching wrestling. I'm just done with WWE.
theirs always TNA....lol
Quit with the spitting/slapping in the face of the legends. You can't compare who held a title back in the day to today. Titles in general are not as meaningful. We get it, there were legends back in the day who didn't get their proper run as champion, or even a chance to carry the title. NOBODY is saying Miz is a more deserving champion than any of those guys who never held the title. He's sure as hell more deserving than Khali, Sheamus, VINCE! and even some guys who had the title back then too. By your comparisons some guys like Cena or Orton, Edge might not be worthy of the title. You cannot use those guys as a comparison. It is a terrible argument. The two situations are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. The times have really changed.
The fact that guys like Perfect, Dibiase, Jake, Piper and others never held the WWF title is a shame, but the times were different. Guys held the title for a year, if not more. Or, it was monopolized by Hogan and whichever big heel he was facing. The IC title back then was as good as a world title. Rude and Perfect are remembered for their great IC title runs, and feuds.
Bottom line is Miz is better than a lot of guys who held the title, and more deserving. And is less deserving than SOME OF THE GREATEST WHO EVER STEPPED IN THE RING. I'm fine with that fact. Miz may be on his way to one of the greatest careers we have ever seen, Or maybe the worst. Who's to really say?
I'm sorry you decided to quit watching wrestling because of a young superstar becoming champion, and didn't watching when Khali became champion. I think it will ultimately be your loss.
What I think you have to accept is that there are now two world championships in the WWE. Therefore, they obviously mean a lot less than they used to. Now I'm a tad too young to remember Backlund winning the title but I was drawn in during the attitude era. The title certainly meant more back then as it did in the 80's and prior. Now I'm not saying this is a good thing but when the brands split the titles were watered down. The elite prestige of holding a title was also watered down with it. I honestly don't even think you can compare being a world champion in today's company with being a champion in the past. The titles guys are holding today have the same names but let's face it, it's not the same as when Backlund, Hogan, Michaels, Hart, Austin, etc. held it. Therefore, there are going to be more mid-cardesque (new word) wrestlers to hold world titles. It may not be like the good old days but that's the way the business is going.
Essentially, I also just don't like when people insult a wrestler in general. I have many guys I don't really care for as well but I always like to show them a good deal of respect. All they do is try to entertain and take massive risks while they do that. The Miz is one of those guys who catches a lot of heat from people but love him or hate him you have to respect the guy and how he's improved and how far he's come since he was a reality star. It's obvious he's put in many many hours of work and devoted his life to the company.
I can't comprehend how you can stop watching WWE after all these years over the Miz becoming champion, especially if you had to sit through Mae Young's hand, Katie Vick, Billy and Chuck, and the infamous Great Khali title run lol. But I hope you enjoy TNA, I don't think it's nearly as bad as everyone says...
**EDIT**
Jaymiine, I swear to God I posted this before I even saw your post. Pretty weird how identical they both are. I like the way you think.
Essentially if you dislike the Miz enough to cause it to be a problem to your viewing habits I'd just recommend thinking of the WWE title as retired in 2002. The one he has now is obviously not the same thing as it once was. I understand where you're coming from though because we all have legends we love and respect the hell out of. When someone becomes champion and a wrestler you loved never got that opportunity it can make you wonder. And I think we can both agree with our thoughts on David Arquette lol. I'd also like to thank you for being able to engage in intelligent discussion that doesn't involve insults and degrading comments. It usually doesn't happen too often on wrestling forums. People can disagree, it always happens. If it didn't then wrestling really wouldn't be any fun[cL];2615472 said:Sir, I respect you. I respect your post and all that you've had to say. You have made EXTREMELY valid points and i hadn't thought of it that way. When the 2 belts made it into the WWE that did water it down a lot. They really haven't held the prestige they had for quite some time. I remember getting this mad when David Arquette won the WCW title...the mae young thing...the kane screwing the corpse thing....and a bunch of other things were really stupid but it wasn't like messing with the world title. I dont' know man, maybe i'm sensitive about it because of how old I am and how long i've been watching. But, again, I agree with the points you've made and thank you for the way you've made them and being polite. I appreciate that.
But yeah...I think its time for me to completely mark out to the UFC and TNA.
lolol
Essentially if you dislike the Miz enough to cause it to be a problem to your viewing habits I'd just recommend thinking of the WWE title as retired in 2002. The one he has now is obviously not the same thing as it once was. I understand where you're coming from though because we all have legends we love and respect the hell out of. When someone becomes champion and a wrestler you loved never got that opportunity it can make you wonder. And I think we can both agree with our thoughts on David Arquette lol. I'd also like to thank you for being able to engage in intelligent discussion that doesn't involve insults and degrading comments. It usually doesn't happen too often on wrestling forums. People can disagree, it always happens. If it didn't then wrestling really wouldn't be any fun
AH YEAH, we finally get to turn on the Miz now that he is on top!
Seriously guys? Are you really that petty? Even if you don't particularly like The Miz, you can't deny that he is good at what he does; draw heat. I personally can't wait to see him get his ass kicked by Orton, but to say he is shit is, well, shit. The Miz is an all-around great performer, get used to him being around.