Well Lord Sidious, I want you to explain to me a few things.
1.) You call me out because I defended the segment. Well in my post, I did not defend this segment directly, I defended pretty much DX. That was pretty much the whole purpose of my first post on this thread. I related everyone's hatred towards DX or just Triple H to the fact he was going to be in the courtroom segment. I did not at all say in my post "Wow, i can't wait for the Hornswoggle promo with DX during the courtroom. I think it is going to be wicked funny and it has so much potential." I was pretty much saying I hate when people completely bash something before it even comes. Let's say there is a rumor that Cena will face the Undertaker at Wrestlemania, I absolutely can't stand when everyone starts bashing it like 5 months ahead before they even see the match saying it will suck and that Cena is terrible and doesn't deserve that. Now sometimes it is logical that something might just completely suck like the Santino and Vicky match or the Chavo and Hornswoggle moments, but in this case with the courtroom segment, (I can see everyone's bitching about Hornswoggle because i am not a fan of him either), what got me mad was the DX bashing because they can at least make a segment decent. For a segment, most of the time more than one person will be involved, and when both of those people completely are a joke, then that is when bashing can be necessary. But if there are 1 or more people in that segment that can cut a promo (DX), then I don't feel ridiculous bashing should be mandatory. So explain to me why you accused me of defending this segment and saying it had potential when not anywhere in my post I said this segment WILL be good. I said A segment can be good if you watch it like a fan and not a critic, but I never said this segment has potential to be amazing.
2.) Why did you consider me a "Shareholder"? When in my post did i start talking about how Vince McMahon is always right and we should bow down to how awesome he is? I was a fan giving my opinion towards the situation. My opinion was that I hate people bashing DX because they feel necessary to always hate Triple H no matter what he is doing or involved in. The only thing I can see where you might of called me a "Shareholder" is when I made a comment about how everyone hates Vince but then forgot what he has brought us. That doesn't mean that I agree with everything he does, but in this case I feel embarrassed for those people when they trash him and say he should retire because he doesn't know what he is doing. I just feel that the man does know what he is doing, but that doesn't make me love him and listen to everything he wants me to do. I'm sorry, but I guess if you make a positive comment about wwe or Vince McMahon you are a "Shareholder" and you aren't a "Shareholder", but a fan if you hate Vince and rebel against everything and disagree with everything Vince does regarding who to cheer for. I don't give a fuck about ratings and I don't care how much money wwe makes. You call me a "WWE Shareholder", but I don't go around looking at stocks and saying "Oh well since Cena gives the business about 3 million dollars in merchandise every week, then he should be cheered." The definition of a shareholder is this: Any person, company, or other institution that owns at least 1 share in a company. A shareholder may also be referred to as a stockholder. I'm not that at all. Yes I do feel insulted you called me that because I left a comment on that thread you made about "WWE Shareholders" saying how I hated them. Am I suppose to hate everything Vince does and not enjoy anything on the tv to be considered a fan like you and not a "WWE Shareholder"? I do not get spoon-fed what to like on the program. I hate Hornswoggle, Santino, Primo, Cryme Tyme, The Great Khali, and MVP even though I am "supposed to like them", and I like The Miz, Edge, Sheamus, Jericho, Rey Mysterio, Randy Orton, Ted DiBiase, CM Punk, and Kane even though if I was a follower of Vince, then I would have to hate them. That is off the top of my head, so obviously there are more examamples but I don't want you to read everyone I hate and like. I enjoy mostly heels more than faces just because I feel feel they always are much more entertaining. Also just because I say that doesn't mean I'm on those fans that "think it's cool to boo faces and cheer heels", it just means I don't care what wwe tells me who I have to like or hate, and I just like who is entertaining and not boring in the ring or when cutting promos. I am not a "WWE Shareholder", and I just want to know why you called me that.
3.) Reasons it may have been cut:
-It was just a rumor on the internet about the promo happening; it was never suppose to happen
-A problem went wrong with the filming
-Vince wanted DX at the arena and not involved in that kind of promo
-Someone in wwe came up with a better solution instead of the promo
-Maybe Verne Troyer felt harassed or could not participate in it
-They couldn't fit that segment in with all the other stuff going on during RAW with DX
I don't know, but there are so many things that could of been possibilities, so I think it is ignorant to just suggest right away that the segment was shitty so Vince did not allow it to go on. That may have been the reason, but then again it may have not been.