Ambiguous Turd
Mid-Card Championship Winner
I have a different suggestion. We need more order with this, as it has been a clusterfuck thus far. Yet the intrigue level is there, ironically enough.
What is needed is scheduled sessions where someone gets put on the hot seat. Then, we need a panel of volunteers for judges in the answers.
If the judges rule that the poster on the hot seat is homophobic in their answer, then they issue Red Rep to the poster.
If the judges rule that the poster on the hot seat is honest and straight forward in their answers, then they Green Rep the poster.
This way, the rewards for participating are either high or devastating, depending on who the judge is and what your answer is.
So to recap:
- Scheduled sessions (8 PM, 10 PM, so forth)
- Panel of judges (4 for each question)
- Green Rep for Good Answers
- Red Rep for answers deemed to be homophobic, or if they take too long to answer with a good answer.
- Poster gets blasted with Red Rep if they leave the thread before the agreed upon time is up (5 minutes).
What is needed is scheduled sessions where someone gets put on the hot seat. Then, we need a panel of volunteers for judges in the answers.
If the judges rule that the poster on the hot seat is homophobic in their answer, then they issue Red Rep to the poster.
If the judges rule that the poster on the hot seat is honest and straight forward in their answers, then they Green Rep the poster.
This way, the rewards for participating are either high or devastating, depending on who the judge is and what your answer is.
So to recap:
- Scheduled sessions (8 PM, 10 PM, so forth)
- Panel of judges (4 for each question)
- Green Rep for Good Answers
- Red Rep for answers deemed to be homophobic, or if they take too long to answer with a good answer.
- Poster gets blasted with Red Rep if they leave the thread before the agreed upon time is up (5 minutes).