Jumping on the "Ask me questions" bandwagon

Pretty much yes. And if Austin loses to Lesnar by a wide margin it means that most people don't want him to be a four time winner.

Maybe its time to try a different format perhaps? I do wonder how it would go if it was broken up into decade long periods and only wrestlers' career performances during said period would be taken into consideration... has that ever been considered by chance?
 
Maybe its time to try a different format perhaps? I do wonder how it would go if it was broken up into decade long periods and only wrestlers' career performances during said period would be taken into consideration... has that ever been considered by chance?

That's basically why we uses primes. But if you're referring to a tournament where we just use 80's wrestlers or 00's wrestlers or 50's wrestlers, no we haven't done that. But I can't see a tournament like that being all that big. And you'd wind up with predictable people at the top anyway.

I think the easiest fix to make is to do what I did in the WWZT and have countries as regions and true neutral locations like Cairo, Egypt or Beijing, China as example host cities. That would cut down on allot of the bullshit if no one had a location, promotion, or era advantage. because almost always that favors modern American WWE wrestlers.
 
That's basically why we uses primes. But if you're referring to a tournament where we just use 80's wrestlers or 00's wrestlers or 50's wrestlers, no we haven't done that. But I can't see a tournament like that being all that big. And you'd wind up with predictable people at the top anyway.

I think the easiest fix to make is to do what I did in the WWZT and have countries as regions and true neutral locations like Cairo, Egypt or Beijing, China as example host cities. That would cut down on allot of the bullshit if no one had a location, promotion, or era advantage. because almost always that favors modern American WWE wrestlers.

Fair enough.
I haven't thought it out properly,tbh, and what you say is also true in that it might not generate as much interest and could also be tedious.

I guess doing the forceful elimination at points will be the best way to go if the majority prefer to see new guys win the tournament.


As for the location stuff, how much of the voters actually take all of that into consideration when placing their vote? Given this is my first tournament, it took a few rounds before I caught on as to the point of it and the gimmick stuff, etc.
But still, it does still seem like the majority pick their favoured guy to win, regardless of the arguments put forward by yourself and some other posters.
 
Fair enough.
I haven't thought it out properly,tbh, and what you say is also true in that it might not generate as much interest and could also be tedious.

I guess doing the forceful elimination at points will be the best way to go if the majority prefer to see new guys win the tournament.


As for the location stuff, how much of the voters actually take all of that into consideration when placing their vote? Given this is my first tournament, it took a few rounds before I caught on as to the point of it and the gimmick stuff, etc.
But still, it does still seem like the majority pick their favoured guy to win, regardless of the arguments put forward by yourself and some other posters.

I'd say quite a bit. Considering it always comes up. Imagine Kurt Angle vs Mitsuharu Misawa in Israel. Who wins then? How do you decide?
 
If you had stayed as Celeste instead of bringing in Kagura, do you think she would have won a singles title by the round Kagura did?
 
If you had stayed as Celeste instead of bringing in Kagura, do you think she would have won a singles title by the round Kagura did?

I'd like to say before. But then again I would have had to build up momentum with Celeste again, as Holmes was gone and I had no alliance to anyone else. I got title shots a lot faster with Kagura than I ever did with Celeste.
 
What did Celeste get for Mothers Day?

Steven got her a diamond necklace. He's old fashioned. For father's day she's thinking about getting him some decorous new patio furniture. She would cook for him, but that's only reserved for when he fucks up; as she can't cook.
 
I'm going to ask both of the handlers this. What are your thoughts on Kagura and Eve forming a team at some point and becoming potentially the first team made up of only females to hold the Tag Team Championship? It didn't quite get to happen with Eve and Sloan, but is this something we could see later down the line?
 
I'm going to ask both of the handlers this. What are your thoughts on Kagura and Eve forming a team at some point and becoming potentially the first team made up of only females to hold the Tag Team Championship? It didn't quite get to happen with Eve and Sloan, but is this something we could see later down the line?

Possibly... TBH I have a story that I'm working on with Kagura. Where it takes her I have no earthly idea.
 
To add: Celeste & Sandy had more of a chance to become Tag Team Champions as Fairy Glitter Armageddon when they formed briefly... and even then, we got knocked out of the running pretty quickly.
 
To add: Celeste & Sandy had more of a chance to become Tag Team Champions as Fairy Glitter Armageddon when they formed briefly... and even then, we got knocked out of the running pretty quickly.

That was the only time in my long tenure that I have legit gotten upset with creative. And it wasn't the fact that we lost, rather than how we lost. I feel it's little wonder why the team didn't last as long as it should or could have.
 
That was the only time in my long tenure that I have legit gotten upset with creative. And it wasn't the fact that we lost, rather than how we lost. I feel it's little wonder why the team didn't last as long as it should or could have.

Who was on creative at that time?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,830
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top