Alright, if you've been following all the stories surrounding Bryan Danielson being fired from the WWE, then you might have come to the conclusion that a lot of it does not make sense. Let's look at the scenarios of why Bryan was fired ...
- Linda McMahon's camp did not like Justin Roberts being choked with a tie, spitting on a person ...
- Mattell called and did not like the violence of the angle and tie choking, spitting ...
- Some outside source called VKM and told them they were mad at the angle ...
- It's a work
Now recently JR blogged and said if you knew Vince like he does, Vince would not take orders on how to run his business from any outsider. The angle was obviously scripted and everyone involved had an idea of how it was going to go down... I mean Superstars is taped before RAW right? And on Superstars they talked about a few things that happened like Cole escaping, Matt Striker being kicked etc etc that would not happen until later in the night.
Now why if it's scripted, would WWE fire a guy who they told too choke someone with a tie and spit on Cena? If it was scripted and Mattell or Linda McMahon didn't like it ... how could a "rookie" like Daniel Bryan be fired for doing what he was told? And even if he was slightly improvising (the tie bit really seems like it was scripted, I dunno about the spitting) why would the WWE fire someone who they seem to be investing in by giving him the biggest storyline in NXT, co-lead of NXT ... and he's obviously an accomplished and skilled wrestler. I mean if a WWE superstar makes a mistake, screws up a line or move, I don't think they're fired regularly do you?
For god's sake, he's only a rookie trying to sell a "cutting edge" style angle that went over amazingly! How often do wrestler's get fired for "getting over?"
The point is, you've got to believe VKM could have and would have protected Bryan from Linda McMahon's campaign manager and the likes of Mattell. And do you really believe they called wanting Bryan's head? I mean, Mattell is toys for crying out loud ...all that angle did was make the kids feel for him more. I mean I may be wrong, but I just feel if someone did have an issue VKM could just say "ok, don't worry about it, it won't happen again... i'll talk to the parties involved. it's partly my writers fault for coming up with some good televison."
I mean, a more believable story for me is that whoever gives cable tv shows their ratings was behind talking too WWE management. I mean if I'm MPAA or w/e it is, FCC or the like ... and I see lets say boobs on tv ... I'm going to be like "Yo, WWE .. WTF? We're going to have to revoke your PG rating" ... but we're talking about tie choking! Bryan didn't curse, we didnt see nudity ... we saw what we see every week ... men beating the hell out of each other and pretending to hate one another. When did PG mean you couldn't choke some one? I mean there are variety of ways wrestlers choke each other. Then this past week, you have a stroke victim being tortured by putting him in a limo and having like 5 head to head collisons with other cars?
If the Benoit issue of choking with tie/rope was involved ... then the firing came completely from the WWE!
How is Linda McMahon's camp going to know about a rule among wrestler's or Mattell for that matter?
I've read John Cena's twitter's/interview on Bryan's firing and it just left me scratching my head. He mentioned Bryan being fired at his expense, and was talking about how if anyone is offended by him defending Bryan he's sorry?
"Sorry for the long message, I know I am probally way out of line, I am sorry if I have offended anyone."
And then on an interview he was talking about how the punishment (Bryan's firing) might not "necessarily" fit the crime? What effing crime?
It's a wrestling show and I've seen the same kind of stuff happen plenty of times before and worse! WWE is not exactly the moral police, they've got some of most hideous skeletons in there closet that you'll ever see.
Then something struck me as odd. I see all this incoherent babble coming froms Cena and then JR posts on his blog(this is from WZ)
"I do know this...John Cena isn't a B.S.'er and I have no reason to believe that John meant what he said. "
I mean is that a typo or what? And why is JR even mentioning John Cena?
Now Kevin Kelly comes out with a new column and says that John Cena is paranoid for being involved with Bryan's firing and I TOTALLY AGREE!
And who would know better then a guy like Kelly whose seen the inner workings of the business.
Cena also made mention of how hard WWE had worked to get WWE the PG rating and in all just seemed like he's been scolding Bryan. His message always comes off as "Bryan was wrong, but he deserves another chance ... a fair chance against me in the ring."
Kevin Kelly mentioned Cena is a top tier guy scared for his position and that seems to be a repeating theme now in WWE.
Lets take a look back 1 year ago ...
Mr Kennedy was just coming off an injury and he returned to RAW by confronting main eventer Randy Orton. In shoot interview, Ken said he'd be involved with feuding for the title with Orton (and I think he said Batista)
That night theres a match, Orton says Ken nearly injured him, Orton scolds Ken, that's not enough, Orton goes to VKM and says "Kennedy is dangerous, I will never work with him again" ... Kennedy is fired shortly after.
It is also said that Orton's close friend Cena went to VKM and compalined about Kennedy as well.
Kennedy was an up and coming guy who WWE couldn't help but put in the main event mix, but he had no seniority like guys like Edge, Jericho, Kane. If you want to determine his potential... how many young new guys do you see now a days given feuds with the likes of the Undertaker?
The point is, atm, the WWE IS AT THE WHIM OF JOHN CENA AND RANDY ORTON. They are both at the very top and they both fear for their jobs.
If you were Cena, wouldn't you be afraid of losing your spot? Nobody over the age of 12 likes you. Your the top baby face of company and get more heat then William Regal!
One thing Cena has over WWE is the PG rating. It's like the ace up his sleeve. "Vince, what baby face can you put the strap on who can carry WWE with a PG rating?" I think ever since Randy Orton turned face, he's lost a quarter of his followed (check the forums to see) Orton got most over because people actually believed he was the "anti-Cena." It really was great on the part of Orton/Cena ... too best friends who were the ying to each others yang and had a 3 year long feud. There were the Cena fans and the anti-Cena fans who really liked Orton. Then both became extremely marketable for two extremely different reasons, but yet while both helping each other.
I have no doubt in my mind Cena/Orton control everything in WWE right now. It's WWE's fault for investing so much in them. But why would WWE complain if their making money.
To make things worse John Cena mentioned in the interview he will never leave the business ...
Anyway, I just want to get everyone's thoughts. Do you think Cena may have gone to Vince (possibly along with bff Orton) to VKM and gotten Bryan fired for spitting on him and seeing him as a threat?
I can see a guy like Cena really taking offense to a guy new to the company spitting on him. You would think at the point Cena has gotten too, someone spitting on him is unforgivable.
Mr Kennedy was fired b/c Orton thought Kennedy didn't drop him right .........
Either way, this new angle has shown how the PG rating can really handicap WWE ... and how Cena is handicapping it even more.
- Linda McMahon's camp did not like Justin Roberts being choked with a tie, spitting on a person ...
- Mattell called and did not like the violence of the angle and tie choking, spitting ...
- Some outside source called VKM and told them they were mad at the angle ...
- It's a work
Now recently JR blogged and said if you knew Vince like he does, Vince would not take orders on how to run his business from any outsider. The angle was obviously scripted and everyone involved had an idea of how it was going to go down... I mean Superstars is taped before RAW right? And on Superstars they talked about a few things that happened like Cole escaping, Matt Striker being kicked etc etc that would not happen until later in the night.
Now why if it's scripted, would WWE fire a guy who they told too choke someone with a tie and spit on Cena? If it was scripted and Mattell or Linda McMahon didn't like it ... how could a "rookie" like Daniel Bryan be fired for doing what he was told? And even if he was slightly improvising (the tie bit really seems like it was scripted, I dunno about the spitting) why would the WWE fire someone who they seem to be investing in by giving him the biggest storyline in NXT, co-lead of NXT ... and he's obviously an accomplished and skilled wrestler. I mean if a WWE superstar makes a mistake, screws up a line or move, I don't think they're fired regularly do you?
For god's sake, he's only a rookie trying to sell a "cutting edge" style angle that went over amazingly! How often do wrestler's get fired for "getting over?"
The point is, you've got to believe VKM could have and would have protected Bryan from Linda McMahon's campaign manager and the likes of Mattell. And do you really believe they called wanting Bryan's head? I mean, Mattell is toys for crying out loud ...all that angle did was make the kids feel for him more. I mean I may be wrong, but I just feel if someone did have an issue VKM could just say "ok, don't worry about it, it won't happen again... i'll talk to the parties involved. it's partly my writers fault for coming up with some good televison."
I mean, a more believable story for me is that whoever gives cable tv shows their ratings was behind talking too WWE management. I mean if I'm MPAA or w/e it is, FCC or the like ... and I see lets say boobs on tv ... I'm going to be like "Yo, WWE .. WTF? We're going to have to revoke your PG rating" ... but we're talking about tie choking! Bryan didn't curse, we didnt see nudity ... we saw what we see every week ... men beating the hell out of each other and pretending to hate one another. When did PG mean you couldn't choke some one? I mean there are variety of ways wrestlers choke each other. Then this past week, you have a stroke victim being tortured by putting him in a limo and having like 5 head to head collisons with other cars?
If the Benoit issue of choking with tie/rope was involved ... then the firing came completely from the WWE!
How is Linda McMahon's camp going to know about a rule among wrestler's or Mattell for that matter?
I've read John Cena's twitter's/interview on Bryan's firing and it just left me scratching my head. He mentioned Bryan being fired at his expense, and was talking about how if anyone is offended by him defending Bryan he's sorry?
"Sorry for the long message, I know I am probally way out of line, I am sorry if I have offended anyone."
And then on an interview he was talking about how the punishment (Bryan's firing) might not "necessarily" fit the crime? What effing crime?
It's a wrestling show and I've seen the same kind of stuff happen plenty of times before and worse! WWE is not exactly the moral police, they've got some of most hideous skeletons in there closet that you'll ever see.
Then something struck me as odd. I see all this incoherent babble coming froms Cena and then JR posts on his blog(this is from WZ)
"I do know this...John Cena isn't a B.S.'er and I have no reason to believe that John meant what he said. "
I mean is that a typo or what? And why is JR even mentioning John Cena?
Now Kevin Kelly comes out with a new column and says that John Cena is paranoid for being involved with Bryan's firing and I TOTALLY AGREE!
And who would know better then a guy like Kelly whose seen the inner workings of the business.
Cena also made mention of how hard WWE had worked to get WWE the PG rating and in all just seemed like he's been scolding Bryan. His message always comes off as "Bryan was wrong, but he deserves another chance ... a fair chance against me in the ring."
Kevin Kelly mentioned Cena is a top tier guy scared for his position and that seems to be a repeating theme now in WWE.
Lets take a look back 1 year ago ...
Mr Kennedy was just coming off an injury and he returned to RAW by confronting main eventer Randy Orton. In shoot interview, Ken said he'd be involved with feuding for the title with Orton (and I think he said Batista)
That night theres a match, Orton says Ken nearly injured him, Orton scolds Ken, that's not enough, Orton goes to VKM and says "Kennedy is dangerous, I will never work with him again" ... Kennedy is fired shortly after.
It is also said that Orton's close friend Cena went to VKM and compalined about Kennedy as well.
Kennedy was an up and coming guy who WWE couldn't help but put in the main event mix, but he had no seniority like guys like Edge, Jericho, Kane. If you want to determine his potential... how many young new guys do you see now a days given feuds with the likes of the Undertaker?
The point is, atm, the WWE IS AT THE WHIM OF JOHN CENA AND RANDY ORTON. They are both at the very top and they both fear for their jobs.
If you were Cena, wouldn't you be afraid of losing your spot? Nobody over the age of 12 likes you. Your the top baby face of company and get more heat then William Regal!
One thing Cena has over WWE is the PG rating. It's like the ace up his sleeve. "Vince, what baby face can you put the strap on who can carry WWE with a PG rating?" I think ever since Randy Orton turned face, he's lost a quarter of his followed (check the forums to see) Orton got most over because people actually believed he was the "anti-Cena." It really was great on the part of Orton/Cena ... too best friends who were the ying to each others yang and had a 3 year long feud. There were the Cena fans and the anti-Cena fans who really liked Orton. Then both became extremely marketable for two extremely different reasons, but yet while both helping each other.
I have no doubt in my mind Cena/Orton control everything in WWE right now. It's WWE's fault for investing so much in them. But why would WWE complain if their making money.
To make things worse John Cena mentioned in the interview he will never leave the business ...
Anyway, I just want to get everyone's thoughts. Do you think Cena may have gone to Vince (possibly along with bff Orton) to VKM and gotten Bryan fired for spitting on him and seeing him as a threat?
I can see a guy like Cena really taking offense to a guy new to the company spitting on him. You would think at the point Cena has gotten too, someone spitting on him is unforgivable.
Mr Kennedy was fired b/c Orton thought Kennedy didn't drop him right .........
Either way, this new angle has shown how the PG rating can really handicap WWE ... and how Cena is handicapping it even more.