Seeing as though I'm an idiot here, please could you tell me how you get drunk.... because I'm sure it involved the intaking of a drug. Therefore Jeff Hardy was on drugs, its irrelevant it is legal or not he is under the influence therefore anyone saying Hardy is on drugs in this video is correct by terms of definition. Now do yourself a favour and shut up.
Whilst yes there are two sides to every story, why now? Why attack Punk jealous that the guy is getting more praise for his mic work alone than his title reign?
The issue here is Punk can preach his straight edge life, why? because its a good thing, a good thing for society and something people should take notice of. Why should they listen to someone who is known drug user criticising it and therefore preaching drug use. That is not acceptable for someone in the public eye. Any views on this should be kept privately otherwise you'll end up with a certainly minority thinking drug use is ok.
Now you're splitting hairs and it's damn funny. Fine, drink is a drug. Do you drink coffee? Tea? Coca-Cola? If so you're a drug user as well, by your own definition. So is the vast majority of this site, I'm sure.
Thankfully, most of us don't like arguing semantics to try and create an argument that, sadly, isn't there. You're right, drink is legal. It is a legal substance that the vast majority of people partake of. You do realize that legends such as Bret Hart, HBK, etc, etc were regularly drunk off their heads on a daily basis? In the days before Facebook and TMZ a lot of things happened that we never heard of. If Jeff Hardy was getting twisted drunk every night we'd hear about it. He obviously enjoyed a few drinks that night, legally, and didn't appear to be involved in any violence. To be honest, he doesn't even seem that drunk.
I could understand if you were complaining he was posting videos of himself under the influence of an illegal substance but that's not the case and you're STILL trying to act as if it's a cardinal sin. It's not. It's very legal and HARDLY immoral. If he was drunk and sexually harassing women or starting fights I'd understand, but he's not. You're looking for an excuse to fall him a fuck up, even in situations where it is NOT justified.
Straight edge is good for society? I'm sorry, but I have the right to choose to drink, to smoke and to take drugs. I don't always exercise this right but I have the freedom to make the choice for myself. Straight edge is self inflicted abstinence, like every other movement on the planet it is NOT beyond criticism and it is not for everyone. I happen to echo Hardy's view on it, to be honest. I smoke to deal with stress and I drink safely with my friends on the weekends. That's my choice and it doesn't make me a bad person.
Right, you're saying Jeff Hardy condones drug use by disagreeing with straight edge? That's pretty funny because that's called putting words in someone's mouth. He could have been disagreeing with it's views on coffee, alcohol, etc, etc. Hardy has the right to disagree with whatever he wants and has the right to voice that opinion. You can't allow and disallow opinions based on whether or not you agree with it, that is stupid and limits something known as FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Both Hardy and Punk can preach whatever they want, just because you disagree with something doesn't make it immoral.
"Any views on this should be kept privately otherwise you'll end up with a certainly minority thinking drug use is ok"
Want to show me where Hardy condoned that? I don't see it anywhere. I've never seen Hardy echo anything but the sentiment of his SD promos which did NOT focus on condoning drug use but on the individual's right to choose to drink or smoke.
Oh btw! If you want to play the definition game, CM Punk does not have the right to call himself straight edge. He drinks pepsi which contains caffeine, a stimulant drug. Straight edge preaches not intaking any substance with mind-altering properties. CM Punk ain't straight-edge.