"but he is soooo way ovuurrr dude!!! he needz da belt!!"
He is the most over superstar right now, and has been for a long time. Look at the reaction he gets, never any boo's. Just constant cheering. And I understand how you could say he dosen't need the belt, because he'd be as over as he is now without it, but the fans are behind him and want him to become WWE Champion. Not saying that alone merits him being champion, but time after time when he comes close it takes a toll on the fans, in regards that we're getting fed up. You could say that he dosen't need the belt, but then again, you can say that he does. Him coming close and close but never getting the belt can kill momentum. Look at him after he lost to Randy Orton at the RR. Yes he was still over but not like before, when he was unbelieveably over. He was RAW for a while. Him having the belt just completes his carear, and he does deserve the title.
"well orton failed tests!!!'
Orton failing tests still means they risked giving him the belt. With his behavior issues, they could have given him the belt and he could completly screw up his title reign because he didn't care, and just not bother with it. Do as little as possible to get by. But what did he do? Had a memorable reign as WWE Champion and had countless good matches. My point is the risk paid off, which could happen with Hardy. Granted, his strikes were for drugs which is a bigger issue. If he fails another test he's gone, and thats a HUGE, HUGE mark against the company. So why bother? Because it's worth the risk for one of the greatest moments in wrestling history.
"oh they are saving it for WM"
Why wouldn't they save it for WrestleMania? I think they'd give him the win at 'Mania just because it would be a huge, memorable win. Again, the risk factor comes into it big time, but him winning the title at say Cyber Sunday wouldn't be as special as at WrestleMania. Heck, even SummerSlam would do for me. Either one of the two, because they're the 2 biggest PPVs that the WWE has. It deserves a big stage.