Please do not tell anyone to get a grip. Do some research.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw5ZNq9ScrM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9dLOr40dao
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcUVEX8T5pw&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL9B4A74D1D09262D0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsvLcgKNwe0
This is just further proof that you have no idea what you are talking about. Not every match has to be long. Certain outcomes can be determined in shorter matches but these are rare insistence's. You are defending MITB? It's still a 1 minute match regardless. Stop trying to hide from the fact it is done often.
I've perfected my impression of you, Dizzy. Do you want to read it? Of course you do! Here it goes...
"IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT TNA DOES WRONG BECAUSE WWE HAVE DONE SOMETHING SIMILAR BEFORE!"
And... scene.
Seriously, can't you come up with better arguments? What's wrong with saying that "the match had to be short because Kurt Angle is injured and the fact that he's a heel means that it's acceptable"? Then someone else would say "why not have Angle drop the belt at the PPV if he's injured?". Then you can say "because Storm winning the belt has created shock and two new main eventers". Then they have no comeback.
I whole-heartedly support Storm winning the belt. I think it's a great move, and I assume you do too. But the arguments you're using... they suck.