Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Cena isn't trolling, Cena is making fans love him. The only people who don't like what he does are the ones who aren't going to like him no matter what he does. That's not trolling, that's on the fans.I like Cena to be honest. I've just come to recognize his utter dominance at the sacred sport of trolling.
Good point, except facts prove it is completely untrue. Check out my Ratings and Financial Information thread in the General Wrestling forum. What you'll see is that since Cena came along, the WWE has done very good business, much better than what they did in the few years between 2001/2002 and when Cena entered the main event.And is responsible for the biggest drop of interest and ratings in professional wrestling history.
Trolls = No buys.
Jericho was silent for a month, Cena's been doing the same old shit for 10 years now
You obviously didn't do as I suggested. Go look it up. What you'll find is that revenue, profit, merchandising all went up, and during down economic times, house show business stayed relatively stable. Combine that with the fact MANY things change how the ratings are decided (such as streaming, DVR, Internet results, etc.), and you'll see that your statement simply does not hold up in the face of facts.They are barely getting a 3 in their ratings, while Cena continues to main event PPV after PPV, and be the centre of attention on Raw every week.
You obviously didn't do as I suggested. Go look it up. What you'll find is that revenue, profit, merchandising all went up, and during down economic times, house show business stayed relatively stable. Combine that with the fact MANY things change how the ratings are decided (such as streaming, DVR, Internet results, etc.), and you'll see that your statement simply does not hold up in the face of facts.
Making more money every year since Cena entered the main-event (minus the write-offs they had last year for their film division) is NOT making excuses, it's proving your statement erroneous.I personally think you are just making excuses for your beloved company.
But making MORE of it is not ensured. Nearly every sector of the economy has suffered since the collapse of financial institutions back in 07/08. Even entertainment sector has suffered...but not the WWE.WWE will always make money, through bad economic times or not.
And the number of channels keeps going up. And when you have relatively the same number of people who are watching, but increase the number of channels they can watch, ratings will go down.Viewership is down
What an incredibly simplistic and naive way of looking at things.and that can only be attributed to talent that heads the WWE roster.
I havent read your documentation (not really caring THAT much about the matter in all honesty)
Uhh, yes. If even one person downloads a show the next day (and I know there are several on here who have/do), that person is not included the original ratings/buyrate, which is what the wrestling websites report.but do you have facts for viewership from DVR, that streaming and internet results reduce viewership?
Yes it is, because it's supported with facts and logic. Yours is based on deliberate and admitted ignorance.If not, then your opinion is no more correct than mine.
Making more money every year since Cena entered the main-event (minus the write-offs they had last year for their film division) is NOT making excuses, it's proving your statement erroneous.
And the number of channels keeps going up. And when you have relatively the same number of people who are watching, but increase the number of channels they can watch, ratings will go down.
What an incredibly simplistic and naive way of looking at things.
Seriously, go read my documentation. What you'll find is that, with the exception of the summer of 2007, the WWE's ratings have been fairly consistent. Of course, the summer of 2007 was when Benoit murdered his family and committed suicide and then a couple of months later, a bunch of wrestlers were linked to steroids.
With the exception of 2007, the WWE has kept fairly consistent ratings, and the wrestling product has grown in amount of money created, even through economic hard times.
So you admit your ignorance to the facts, and yet still are taking a position that is completely false. I love it.
Uhh, yes. If even one person downloads a show the next day (and I know there are several on here who have/do), that person is not included the original ratings/buyrate, which is what the wrestling websites report.
That's a reduction in viewership.
Yes it is, because it's supported with facts and logic. Yours is based on deliberate and admitted ignorance.