I'd like to know if you could erase one title reign from history for each championship currently active in World Wrestling Entertainment, which would it be and why?
WWE CHAMPIONSHIP
Batista in June 2009. It lasted a grand total of 2 days, making it absolutely pointless, especially considering that Orton won it back right afterwards. Why put the belt on someone for 2 days only to give it back to the guy he won it from? Pointless.
WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP
I'm pretty sure the majority will agree here, The Great Khali in summer 2007. He only got the title reign because of Kane not wanting it when he and Edge were feuding. Kane as champion would have been so much better and we would not have had to sit through any of those awful Khali VS Batista matches.
INTERCONTINENTAL CHAMPIONSHIP
William Regal in 2008. It ended the Honkameter angle with Santino, which had enormous potential if they had let him break the record. Then what did Regal do with this reign? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
UNITED STATES CHAMPIONSHIP
R-Truth's reign in May 2010. I understand they needed to get the title of of Hart for the "gift" reign they gave him, but this one was just boring. Truth did nothing of relevance, much like Swagger right now. Although the current reign still has hope of something happening.
TAG TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP
Deuce & Domino in 2007. They were nowhere near ready to be champions yet, and likely never were going to be. This was proof that the tag team division had declined significantly already.
DIVAS CHAMPIONSHIP
Brie Bella in 2011. She was by far the worst ever to hold the belt and I cannot fathom why WWE ever considered this to be a good decision.
So what about the rest of you? Please include why you would remove each reign and limit it to just one per belt.
Discuss!
WWE CHAMPIONSHIP
Batista in June 2009. It lasted a grand total of 2 days, making it absolutely pointless, especially considering that Orton won it back right afterwards. Why put the belt on someone for 2 days only to give it back to the guy he won it from? Pointless.
WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP
I'm pretty sure the majority will agree here, The Great Khali in summer 2007. He only got the title reign because of Kane not wanting it when he and Edge were feuding. Kane as champion would have been so much better and we would not have had to sit through any of those awful Khali VS Batista matches.
INTERCONTINENTAL CHAMPIONSHIP
William Regal in 2008. It ended the Honkameter angle with Santino, which had enormous potential if they had let him break the record. Then what did Regal do with this reign? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
UNITED STATES CHAMPIONSHIP
R-Truth's reign in May 2010. I understand they needed to get the title of of Hart for the "gift" reign they gave him, but this one was just boring. Truth did nothing of relevance, much like Swagger right now. Although the current reign still has hope of something happening.
TAG TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP
Deuce & Domino in 2007. They were nowhere near ready to be champions yet, and likely never were going to be. This was proof that the tag team division had declined significantly already.
DIVAS CHAMPIONSHIP
Brie Bella in 2011. She was by far the worst ever to hold the belt and I cannot fathom why WWE ever considered this to be a good decision.
So what about the rest of you? Please include why you would remove each reign and limit it to just one per belt.
Discuss!
