Hrrmmmm. ESPN has always been
so kind to professional wrestling. I can
totally see them sitting Hulk Hogan down on SportsCenter and giving him 20 minutes to discuss his upcoming pay-per-view. Right? Oh, but wait, they show old AWA matches at one in the morning, that means they secretly care about pro wrestling, right?
I'll be shocked if ESPN doesn't shit all over TNA/IW. These boards are obviously wrestling-centric, and people here in this echo chamber often forget that professional wrestling isn't only unpopular, it's less popular than it was even five years ago. (Get back to me with your counterarguments when people stop looking at ratings that don't go down for a month as a success.) ESPN gains more by poking snide fun at Hogan for their regular audience than they do by sitting down and treating him like a competitive athlete promoting a business for the sake of professional wrestling fans who are either watching ESPN already or have no interest in it.
The same goes for Mike and Mike (I miss the Mad Dog), WFAN is a tossup (they've been kind to pro wrestlers before, but are also aware that their bread and butter is regular red meat New York sports), and the rest off the top list, I've never heard of.
The bottom list is where the good publicity will come in. Howard Stern, even though his audience is way the fuck down from where it was when he was famous, will probably be good for TNA/IW. (Unless he starts in about Bubba. Bet ground rules for that will be established before they go on the air.) Today seems like an odd place to promote professional wrestling, but they'll be kind to Hogan- what you want to worry about on the Today show is Hogan going into business for himself and not talking up TNA/IW. (Not that he's
ever been guilty of
that in the past two years...) Fox and Friends hits a good audience.
People are eager to write off media appearances as unambiguous positives for TNA/IW, which simply isn't true. It's good for TNA/IW if the outlets that they're appearing on think they can get more by promoting TNA/IW rather than tearing it down. Given the history of some of those outlets, ESPN in particular, I'd be keeping my guard up.
Because you act like he holds all the power when you have to be requested to be on these networks. There has to be a mutual interest on the network/station to want you to be on and for you to accept and do it. If the network/station isn't interested, then you can't do a thing. It's that simple.
And people complain about why they re-signed him? This is why. If Hogan is so irrelevant and old, why would ESPN, CBS, Hot 97 (A HIP HOP RADIO CHANNEL) and major networks like Fox book him to be on their programs?
The man is a draw because he can do exactly this. This is why he's brought on board and It's great timing for him to get a massive media tour for BFG and TNA.
So, according to you, for two years, no one had much interest in putting Hogan on their television/radio show (minus Bubba, of course, who was bought and paid for); however, his signing was justified due to the publicity he could bring in. So following this logic, Hulk Hogan spent the past two years dicking around, waiting for when he'd be used for this specific promotional opportunity, and was never to "spike the needle". (Who was the guy who kept saying that last year, anyways? Seems to have slipped my mind for the moment....)
I don't argue your basic point. No one's going to put AJ Styles on network television. No one's going to put Kurt Angle on network television. But Jesus H. Christ, you're so eager to defend TNA/IW from all conceivable and theoretical attacks that you manage to contradict your own post within an hour and a half of making it. If you weren't so worried about defending
everything about TNA/IW, you could probably string together a logical argument that wouldn't be so easily disassembled.