Really? really? That's what you lead your response with? Why should anyone even bother to hear what you have to say or side with your position?Blah blah blah.
I'd like to think I know enough about Jushin Liger to do just that. I hope after this post you and many others will agree.Look, this is all Kayfabe.This is a match that has never happened, never will happen, so we have to base our decisions on what we know about the participants involved.
First it's highly contentious to say either man was in their "prime". Perhaps a point could be made if you mean in physical health and relative lack of injury but certainly not in terms of career accomplishments/success; And with regards to Liger, his ability, technique/skill, power, and experience, has just gotten exponentially better as the years roll by. Sufficed to say Pillman hasn't.We can suppose all we like, which is all this is really. The fact that Liger lost to Brian Pillman when both were in their prime is a relevant factor for me.
[sarcasm]You're right, how silly of me, Michaels has never lost a match to anyone... ever... I question why we even have this tournament when clearly the trophy should already be in Michaels' display case [/sarcasm] no hyperbole pleaseMichaels is a wrestler that's been known for taking on wrestlers of all shapes, all sizes, all with different attributes to bring to the table and, one way or another, he holds victories over all of them.
Where this true -and let me assure you it is not- Shawn Michaels is hardly a large man by any definition, so this would be a rather moot point. In his gassed up prime he could barely keep a lean 220 lbs. on his frame kayfabe be damned, and as you -or anyone with a functioning pair of eyes- can surely see the body which he returned with in the early 2000's is nowhere near the afore mentioned physical peak. Liger on the other hand, by your own admission, has never had a problem wrestling -and dominating- men of Shawn's ever fluctuating size.Liger is great, I'll never say otherwise, but ALL of his greatest matches and accomplishments in his career have been against cruiserweights.
So basically you're saying:Shawn's all around performance against all these various names is another factor that's part of my choice. He's proven that he can take on any type of opponent successfully and, simply put, Liger hasn't.
- HBK can beat a man of any size
- Liger is a man of a specific size
- Therefore HBK can beat Liger
If Shawn can beat a man of any size, then Liger's size is of no consequence. Okay. Then you say Liger can only defeat Cruiserweights, and can not beat Heavyweights, so size -at least for Liger- still matters, and yet Shawn himself has commented that his maximum weight was about 220 lbs. and since his return it fluctuates between 190lbs. and 205 lbs.
"Now leaner than he's ever been --the 6'1", 41-year-old wrestled as heavy as 220 but now fluctuates anywhere between 190 and 205 pounds -- Michaels credits his hybrid cardio and resistance training workouts, to a clean diet of 4-5 meals per day, and a hearty supplement regimen that features everything from Vitamin C and whey protein to omega 3's and thermogenics for his resurgence."
Now, by WWF Light Heavyweight (which, though never recognized in the US due to WWE's love of restructuring history, is a belt has Liger won) and WWE Cruiserweight definitions (both >215lbs.) Shawn Michaels a WWE contracted wrestler is a Cruiserweight. Better yet, the IWGP Jr. Heavyweight category, which you erroneously claim is the only category Liger can succeed in, is 100 kg and under. Now if we employ some quick math, 100kg. becomes 220lbs., the maximum weight Michaels ever was.
So at no time has Michaels ever been heavy enough to give Liger any problem -and at 190lbs. would get smeared on the mat like jelly-, and Liger's size as you say, doesn't matter to Shawn. Clearly for our intents and purposes, as it relates to a match between Jushin "Thunder" Liger vs. Shawn Michaels, it's less than insignificant who weighs what, who can beat what Heavyweights, what weight divisions they wrestle(d) in, etc., etc., etc. Or should I say ...Blah, Blah, Blah...
Apologies, you were just the one who said it had little significance.As to the mention of strength, I wasn't the one that brought strength into the equation.
Well if it's not about strength, which Liger has more of. And it's clearly not about size, which apparently depends on Michaels eating a rather copious amount of food the day of the match; what is it based on? Technique? Liger trained around the world, has a history of amatuer wrestling, a vast martial arts knowledge, and is a better mat wrestler and highflyer. Experience? Liger is about the same age as Shawn, debuted the same year, and as you love to point out has plenty of experience besting men of Michaels' relative size/ability. Environment? Liger, especially as Kishin Liger, has and will tear down and ECW-esque environment.This is a contest that wouldn't be decided by strength.
Perhaps Shawn isn't, but the Beast God is quite well known for literally tossing men twice his size all over the place. He has routinely LigerBombed men up to the size of Mitsuharu Misawa, who is close to 250lbs., and even walking Liger Bombed and rather rotund Samoa Joe who clocks in at around 290 pounds.Neither of these two are known for being physical powerhouses.
Please, see the above. Re-read it as many times as necessary, then by all means come back and say it's baseless.My intention was to point out that a statement of Liger being stronger than Michaels is baseless.
By the By:
BASLESS [beys-lis]
adjective
having no base; without substantiation; without foundation; groundless: a baseless claim.
Synonyms: bottomless, flimsy, foundationless, gratuitous, groundless, reasonless, unconfirmed, uncorroborated, unfounded, ungrounded, unjustifiable, unjustified, unsubstantiated, unsupported, untenable, unwarranted
I'm tired... I'm sure you can deduce the answer to this somewhere in this post. You can, can't you?I used Michaels' matches and wins over much more powerful wrestlers as a means of showing that even if Liger does have an advantage in power, which is something that's highly debatable, I simply don't see how it'll play much of a role.
-Cheers