But KB you must not have been watching TV for the last year or so. Trump is going to make America great again 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That sums it up perfectly. There's a big, big difference between a not great candidate and a snake oil salesman who only cares about enhancing his brand. If Hilary wins, we have a not great President for four years. If Trump wins, I'm not sure where we are in four years.
I voted for Evan McMullin and I as proud to do so. He was the candidate that I felt best represented my beliefs. I understand that voting third party probably won't cause any ripples, but I couldn't bring myself to vote either Trump or Hillary.
Some say that they prefer an uncertainty over a certain negative. I disagree with them, but you can kind of understand why they'd be inclined to take a gamble.
This kind of self-righteousness and "good vs evil" mentality is the reason why political discourse is dumbed down to the degree it is, and the reason why someone like Trump is a serious candidate to be one of the most powerful people in the world.
Trump is the worst choice, but he's not going to bring about the end times. No candidate will.
And rational people would say that Hilary is the uncertainty in this example.
And rational people would say that Hilary is the uncertainty in this example.
No shit. People's inability to use sense in arguments, get immediately defensive and not have an intelligent debate is one of the most annoying things about this entire election. Both sides think the other will make sure everything turns out apocalypse. We've been on a downward trend for quite a long time now and, regardless of who wins the election, it'll likely continue.
And rational people would say that Hilary is the uncertainty in this example.
Don't know how you'd see Hillary as more uncertain when compared to Trump. You said yourself that she wouldn't be a great president, which indicates some certainty. I agree that Hillary will always be a better choice than Trump, but that doesn't make her a good choice, and many see Trump as an uncertainty, which in their eyes, is worth taking a gamble on.
No shit. People's inability to use sense in arguments, get immediately defensive and not have an intelligent debate is one of the most annoying things about this entire election. Both sides think the other will make sure everything turns out apocalypse. We've been on a downward trend for quite a long time now and, regardless of who wins the election, it'll likely continue.
Those people are stupid. I really don't know how else to put it.
Барбоса;5604671 said:I see Trump is getting his excuse in quickly in Nevada.
This kind of self-righteousness and "good vs evil" mentality is the reason why political discourse is dumbed down to the degree it is, and the reason why someone like Trump is a serious candidate to be one of the most powerful people in the world.
Trump is the worst choice, but he's not going to bring about the end times. No candidate will.
The only dumbed down thing we're dealing with here is your inability to read and comprehend what's in front of you. I said both candidates would be ineffective as president, which is the exact opposite of calling Trump the end of the world. Normal political discourse doesn't apply here given one of the candidates is unstable and, yes, evil. I didn't say that about Romney because it would've been false.
Trump is not evil. Hillary is not evil. "Evil" is reserved for movie villains, not real life.
Барбоса;5604693 said:Godwin's Law approaching...
I have to agree with Nick Cohen, and say that Godwin's Law does not apply in dangerous times, even if dangerous may be a bit hyperbolic.