I think that hating Brooke Hogan would be the only possible niche she could have in TNA/IW. I don't think she has the acting chops to make people keep buying it for more than a couple of months. As a heel, it will go from "I can't believe this bitch is here!" to "Is this bitch still here? Ugh." pretty fast.Two totally different situations. Nepotistic advancement is not a face quality. It made no sense to have Garret be a face. Even as the underdog facing his father people would not accept him. He couldn't look or act the part. Brooke as a heel authority figure or heel enemy of her father may actually work.
But that is the one, and only, way I think you could make Brooke Hogan work in professional wrestling, as a Vickie Guerrero figure that everyone wants to see hit by a fucking bus. I don't give TNA/IW that much credit; expect Brooke Hogan to largely be used as a prop for her father.
I'll be more surprised if she's allowed to be her own character. Garret Bischoff never was; from the second he was mentioned, he was attached at the hip in storyline to his father. I won't deny that this could work out, because professional wrestling is the strangest fucking business. I don't think that TNA/IW will be able to pull off the difficult task of getting an audience invested, for good or ill, in a Brooke Hogan type.I think you're coming around to this idea. Brooke is expected to play this role od clueless, helpless, smiley Hulk's daughter but in the end she may surprise everyone. Excwpt me.
I don't feel that this is a vehicle for Brooke Hogan to enhance TNA/IW; I feel that this is a vehicle for TNA/IW to enhance Brooke Hogan.