My$terio_Fan
I can do whatever I want
Ok a though occured to me while reading the TNA section and old and new threads. Alot of TNA fans are precieved as being stupid or irrational.
TNA starts as this little organization that could. The first year or two, TNA was recieving high praise for their promotion. Fans and general watchers alike commented on the great wrestling matches, interesting new guys, and the overall feel of the show.
TNA really seemed like a huge hit on the internet and you couldn't log on without seeing something about AJ Styles, Somoa Joe, or the X Division. Alot of fans really believed in the product and believed TNA could someday compete with the WWE. So the show slowly grew in popularity.
After a few years when TNA started recieving some industry buzz, they began to hire some big named stars to boost the roster. Angle, Nash, Booker, Christian, Sting, ect all came to the roster and even lower card former stars like Rikishi, Test, Billy Gunn, Gail Kim, Duddleys, Matt Morgan, ect. At first the TNA fans seemed happy and content that the show was finally getting reaction from stars, but soon fans began to cry foul.
Many internet fans blasted TNA for losing their objective, and losing their originality. They hated that "rejects" from other companies were taking center stage, well guys like Styles, the X-Division, and Joe were put on the back burner.
Now the majority of the time TNA fans bitch more than their WWE counterparts. They blast the direction TNA has went in and blame people like Angle, Jarett, Russo, and Dixie for the mess of a product. But it almost seems as the # of threads bitching about "TNA Sucks" began to rise, the rating also seemed to rise too.
So it could be said that while TNA might have stopped catering to the "Original TNA" fans and started in a new direction, this direction is working. TNA is gaining, slowly but surely. While many IWC fans are pissed at the storylines, feuds, ect the general audience seems to be falling for TNA.
So are TNA fans stupid to want the original TNA back when the new product is looking up? Or are they wiser than they appear, and think that maybe without the "rejects" and going into a WWE "light" direction the audience would have gained even more?
On a business stand point should TNA keep following the same direction? Or take a risk and try something different.
I can see both sides personally. I think TNA fans are stupid at times(or naive)at wanting the original back since the "new" TNA is more popular and mainstream. But I can see why they would bitch, remember recycled WWE guys and storylines will only get you so far.
So are TNA fans stupid/naive? Or are they really more informed then most think? Should quality rule over profit? And if profit and viewership is up, does that mean the quality is betteR?
TNA starts as this little organization that could. The first year or two, TNA was recieving high praise for their promotion. Fans and general watchers alike commented on the great wrestling matches, interesting new guys, and the overall feel of the show.
TNA really seemed like a huge hit on the internet and you couldn't log on without seeing something about AJ Styles, Somoa Joe, or the X Division. Alot of fans really believed in the product and believed TNA could someday compete with the WWE. So the show slowly grew in popularity.
After a few years when TNA started recieving some industry buzz, they began to hire some big named stars to boost the roster. Angle, Nash, Booker, Christian, Sting, ect all came to the roster and even lower card former stars like Rikishi, Test, Billy Gunn, Gail Kim, Duddleys, Matt Morgan, ect. At first the TNA fans seemed happy and content that the show was finally getting reaction from stars, but soon fans began to cry foul.
Many internet fans blasted TNA for losing their objective, and losing their originality. They hated that "rejects" from other companies were taking center stage, well guys like Styles, the X-Division, and Joe were put on the back burner.
Now the majority of the time TNA fans bitch more than their WWE counterparts. They blast the direction TNA has went in and blame people like Angle, Jarett, Russo, and Dixie for the mess of a product. But it almost seems as the # of threads bitching about "TNA Sucks" began to rise, the rating also seemed to rise too.
So it could be said that while TNA might have stopped catering to the "Original TNA" fans and started in a new direction, this direction is working. TNA is gaining, slowly but surely. While many IWC fans are pissed at the storylines, feuds, ect the general audience seems to be falling for TNA.
So are TNA fans stupid to want the original TNA back when the new product is looking up? Or are they wiser than they appear, and think that maybe without the "rejects" and going into a WWE "light" direction the audience would have gained even more?
On a business stand point should TNA keep following the same direction? Or take a risk and try something different.
I can see both sides personally. I think TNA fans are stupid at times(or naive)at wanting the original back since the "new" TNA is more popular and mainstream. But I can see why they would bitch, remember recycled WWE guys and storylines will only get you so far.
So are TNA fans stupid/naive? Or are they really more informed then most think? Should quality rule over profit? And if profit and viewership is up, does that mean the quality is betteR?