Tiger Chaos Theory
You ain't drawin' shit!
I don't think we are disagreeing about anything here at all now.
An analysis on why nobody read Rayne's analysis of the election
- Thread starter JGlass
- Start date
I don't think we are disagreeing about anything here at all now.
And mine. You like reading mine, too dontcha? Dontcha? Dontcha? Dontcha? Dontcha? Dontcha? Dontcha?
You should know by now that's a quality exclusive to myself. No parrot or regurgitator can lack a sense of humor like I can.
Given the choice between a not very bright poster who is thoroughly derivative in everything they say but has the decency to say it quickly; and a not very bright poster who takes a thousand words to say a modestly original 'good morning'; I find myself favouring the former.
Apparently IDR doesn't either, and if two TNA fans don't get sarcasm, that must mean all of the TNA fans don't get it.
That was sarcasm, by the way.
I'm a TNA fan and I totally get sarcasm. I take comments like this incredibly seriously. Apologise this instant.
At least I don't have my underwear in a bunch. It's nice for a change.
I think my new found fandom for TNA is messing with my Jewishness; was that sarcasm? I can't tell.
I like you now Killjoy. I mean, I liked you before this post, I just felt like now would be an appropriate place to tell you. That's not sarcasm.
It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
Very much so. Granted, I don't venture in to the WWE sections (as I don't watch their programming), so I can't speak to that "side of the coin", so to speak, but there are a number of personalities I find enjoyable here, even if I disagree with them. You are among them.
It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
Granted, but this doesn't really answer the question at hand. Which category does Rayne actually fall under for you?
Tiger Chaos Theory
You ain't drawin' shit!
I'd imagine neither since the posters in his example were both not very bright.
The latter; I would have thought it comparatively obvious.
A potted summary:
Incredibly long winded with nothing close to the quality of content to justify posts of such length. Dullness matched only by the incredibly high opinion he appears to hold of the talent he does not in fact possess. Clearly puts thrice the effort into attempting to sound 'intelligent' that he does into making his comments interesting, relevant, readable, entertaining or otherwise worthy of existence.
Think me if I were a shit poster.
I'll take another JGlass or two over him any day of the week.
A potted summary:
Incredibly long winded with nothing close to the quality of content to justify posts of such length. Dullness matched only by the incredibly high opinion he appears to hold of the talent he does not in fact possess. Clearly puts thrice the effort into attempting to sound 'intelligent' that he does into making his comments interesting, relevant, readable, entertaining or otherwise worthy of existence.
Think me if I were a shit poster.
I'll take another JGlass or two over him any day of the week.
Unless you disagree with me. Then I'll have no choice but to tell you that you're wrong. I'm stubborn that way.
It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
JGlass doesn't fit the bill of parrot here, though. The question isn't Rayne v. JGlass, it's Rayne v. repetitive generics. How many of those are required to meet the quota?
Unless you disagree with me. Then I'll have no choice but to tell you that you're wrong. I'm stubborn that way.
DirtyJosé
Best angle of all: retirement
I'll amend a previous comment I made:
Rayne is like IDR and xfear; they suck the fun out of everything as soon as they post.
Rayne is like IDR and xfear; they suck the fun out of everything as soon as they post.
Pay Per Ghost
What they f*ck happened in the thread section here
xfear, na.
Rayne has been douchey since his return asking people to PayPal him money.
He is taking the fact that people are taking the election seriously, too seriously.
Rayne has been douchey since his return asking people to PayPal him money.
He is taking the fact that people are taking the election seriously, too seriously.
It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
DirtyJosé;3674974 said:
Rather suck the fun out and have an objective, intelligent discussion than waste my time posting juvenile jokes and going to extreme lengths to trash posters I don't like, which is primarily why I spend little time in the Bar Room.
DirtyJosé
Best angle of all: retirement
So if you don't want to go out of your way to talk shit about people, why are you going out of your way to talk shit about people?
It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
DirtyJosé;3675009 said:
Who have I talked shit about? Find a single name in this thread.
Making objecitve (albeit generalized) statements about the quality of users on the forum ≠ trashing users. Starting threads about a specific user just to talk about how "shit" they are does.
Similar threads
