2012 Debater's League: Smack Talk and General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's what I got

DirtyJose vs hatehabsforever

Awesome_Miz vs deanandterry

CP Munk vs nightmare

IHW vs Rohan

The Rattlesnake vs Milenko

The Talon vs Pancake

Paralyzer Z vs Killjoy

Stormtrooper vs Mr. Steve
 
From what I see, Mr. Steve and Nate are the only ones with any shred of decent shit-talking ability.
 
I had a tonne of cashews earlier. I look forward to seeing a distinct nuttiness in my next bowel movement.

That's talking shit.

I can already see at least three guys dropping out early. Take that how you will.
 
I had a tonne of cashews earlier. I look forward to seeing a distinct nuttiness in my next bowel movement.

That's talking shit.

I can already see at least three guys dropping out early. Take that how you will.

Ok, that's just nasty as fuck.












...and just as funny.
 
This is a bunch of horseshit. Now shut the fuck up so I can judge & mock the debaters in the prelims tomorrow.
 
I will prove myself tomorrow! I do not look at this as a chance to "get in" the tournament; I take this as a chance to whoop ass in a debate!
 
Damn, if that shit happened after the whooping I'd lay on him he'd become Mrs. Steve.

OH.

HELL.

NAW.

1025763_o.gif


Dearest Stormtrooper:

You are, indeed, a raging herpes coldsore.

Sincerely yours: Mr. Steve.
 
Looks like we got our first feud.

No, it's not. It's me simply establishing my gentlemanly intentions towards Stormtrooper in a most polite manner, who he just so happened to state something towards my person in a most derisive manner. It's why I wrote towards him in a letter.

You get no letter, at all. As a gentleman, I shall ensure that your ever-growing butthurt intensifies as the debate rages on (should we ever match on).

Yours in confidence, the guy that will make you remember to be precise as a motherfucker.
 
Just stating this now so that nobody gets butthurt if I'm joking around in the spam zones with anyone. Yes, outside of the league we are friends, not friends, or just whatever. In the league, that goes away. No favoritism, no bias. Earn that shit.
 
Yeah, you guys are gonna be so fair & unbiased.

We kinda have to be. Outside the league, I can consider you to be a decent kid or whatever I want. Inside, I have to be impartial to only what you post in your debate. Now if you want to claim that there is a bias during the debates, make your claim to D-Man or Dagger and go from there. But until then, relax until your match-up comes. And when it comes, you best do your research. You can't half ass it, get a bad score, and claim bias. Shit don't work that way.
 
Why do people think that the judges will be biased? They don't really know any of us outside of the forums for the most part, so why would they have a preference regarding who wins? I haven't participated in the Debaters League before, but I did take part in the Sports Debater's League last year, and the judges in that were totally fair and impartial. No reason to think this will be any different.

Except for Nate of course. We all know how unreasonable he can be ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top