2012 Debater's League: Smack Talk and General Discussion Thread

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

Hey, I did not talk about Munk being ******ed. And seriously, I stopped bolding in my last reply. I did that earlier so that judges can have an easier time reading the debate. It must get tedious reading through all of it so I bolded the bullet points.

 

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

How is Munk being ******ed?

Bolding every other word is a little ******ed!

By comparing being hit by a car and just avoiding it by a second to the difference between wrestling in a six sided ring to a four sided ring. That was a little....um..strange.

 

[Mr. Steve]

 

[Mitch Henessey]

I don't know either, but Dirty is convincing me.

MITCH! I'M GONNA FUCK YOU UP, VAN GOGH STYLE!

...............

'Sup, Mitch? Ready to die?

^^^^^

This one was better

 

[Johnny Scumm]

Hey, I did not talk about Munk being ******ed. And seriously, I stopped bolding in my last reply. I did that earlier so that judges can have an easier time reading the debate. It must get tedious reading through all of it so I bolded the bullet points.

Actually, you did.

 

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

The debate between Scumm and me has finished up. Feel free to judge it, guys.

 

[hatehabsforever]

I think the judging in the Rattlesnake/Scumm debate should be very interesting.

 

[Johnny Scumm]

College life is awful. I was told I'd have an exam today, hence why I rounded up last night, then I find out this morning that I don't have one.

So I could've really carried on, but it seems right that because I said I'd finish there that I do.

 

[D-Man]

By comparing being hit by a car and just avoiding it by a second to the difference between wrestling in a six sided ring to a four sided ring. That was a little....um..strange.

I hope this argument stops here. I'd hate to hand out another infraction.

 

[D-Man]

Rattlesnake, why did you create two posts in a row in your debate? That's against the rules.

I have to delete your latest reply. You won't be able to re-post it unless your opponent replies, first.

 

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

Rattlesnake, why did you create two posts in a row in your debate? That's against the rules.

I have to delete your latest reply. You won't be able to re-post it unless your opponent replies, first.

Munk said he had finished up D-Man, so I just posted my conclusion in a different post just like KillJoy did in our debate in the previous round. Look, even here he says that he has finished up.

 

[Johnny Scumm]

Rattlesnake, why did you create two posts in a row in your debate? That's against the rules.

I have to delete your latest reply. You won't be able to re-post it unless your opponent replies, first.

I don't think I'll be putting up another reply D-Man. I'm about to head out now and I'll be gone a few hours.

 

[D-Man]

Munk said he had finished up D-Man, so I just posted my conclusion in a different post just like KillJoy did in our debate in the previous round. Look, even here he says that he has finished up.

Yes but when Killjoy did it we all established that it shouldn't have been done that way. We let that one slide and was going to stick to the format, going forward.

It would really be unfair of me to allow that post to count, regardless of whether Scumm is finished or not.

Let me consult with Dagger and I will come to a final decision on it.

I don't think I'll be putting up another reply D-Man. I'm about to head out now and I'll be gone a few hours.

Understood. Let me see how this should be handled.

 

[¡Roján!]

Are we talking about the time Killjoy posted twice in a row in another debate or in my debate?

 

[D-Man]

I don't remember which debate but yes, he posted twice in a row.

 

[¡Roján!]

I'm so confused. Posting twice in a row is illegal, no? Does it become legal after someone missed the deadline?

 

[D-Man]

Posters must reply to each other within 24 hours otherwise it affects their Punctuality points. However, that does not mean the opponent can make a second post in a row.

That would only happen if the first debater doesn't make their initial post within 24 hours of the home debater making their initial choices in the debate.

 

[ABMorales787]

I posted twice in a row in my debate with Rattlesnake because there was well over a day left on that one. Besides, that just looks pathetic. You've got that much time left and you just close things. It looks like you are trying to avoid stuff in the debate and that you failed to pace yourself.

 

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

So, D-Man, Dagger, has the issue been resolved?

 

[D-Man]

Yes and my decision stands. That post will not be counted in the debate.

 

[Stormtrooper]

Well Dirty decided to intentionally sacrifice punctuality, nice. Twice he missed the 24 hour deadline. Good job Dirty.

It was a good debate, DirtyJose.

 

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

Yes and my decision stands. That post will not be counted in the debate.

Can I post my conclusion after the passage of 24 hours since Scumm's post or will I not be able to post it at all?

Man, I feel like shit. I could have easily posted the conclusion at the end of the last post that I made but I just thought of making another post seeing that Scumm had mentioned that it would be his last post. I guess, if Scumm had posted a proper conclusion, I would have been able to make that post.

I guess, I cannot ask you to add the conclusion at the end of my last post either, can I?

EDIT: Oh well, I just saw that the time for posting the conclusion had ended so I guess no conclusion for me.

 

[ABMorales787]

Next time, use math.

 

[Hulk Hogan's Brother]

Man, it was such a small mistake but I feel I am going to pay big time for it.

 

[Johnny Scumm]

I posted twice in a row in my debate with Rattlesnake because there was well over a day left on that one. Besides, that just looks pathetic. You've got that much time left and you just close things. It looks like you are trying to avoid stuff in the debate and that you failed to pace yourself.

I closed early because I truly didn't believe I was going to be able to post again because of what would've been a 3-Hour exam today. Obviously as I said, it didn't happen, so it was a slight disruption, but I kept to my guns.

Yes and my decision stands. That post will not be counted in the debate.

Ah well then. As the Snake pointed out, it could've easily gone in his other post. Really looking forwards to judging now.