2012 Debater's League: Smack Talk and General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
No need to thank me; you're doing the work, so thank yourself. I am sympathetic to slow replies; I've not been the poster boy for punctuality this year myself, and I did end up ditching Nick last year a little bit. I get it; life and all that shit. But surely one can manage to pop in over the course of two days and put SOMETHING up.
 
DirtyJosé;3854901 said:
No need to thank me; you're doing the work, so thank yourself. I am sympathetic to slow replies; I've not been the poster boy for punctuality this year myself, and I did end up ditching Nick last year a little bit. I get it; life and all that shit. But surely one can manage to pop in over the course of two days and put SOMETHING up.

Ok. Thank you Johnny Scumm. Then again, I must say, Rattlesnake's put up a fight. Over two days, you should've posted, I'd be shocked if you didn't. I'm slightly disappointed in Rohan, he's definitely pulling an Awesome_Miz, just worse.

The 24 Hour limit's cool, I just prefer people to reply beforehand and definitely not after. That's just me, whether its OCD or the want to debate. This has definitely been my best debate though.
 
Sucks for Rohan. Glad to see him try to get something up. I've shit on the guy before, but I've had the guy on my shortlist of possible threats in this thing. I was looking forward to seeing he and Killjoy bash heads together.
 
¡Roján!;3855086 said:
Finally, it's up. And, it only took me 2 and a half hours too.

Nice of you to grace us with your presence, Rohan. And here I thought you had conceded, for obvious reasons.
 
Man, I'm sorry guys. I really didn't think I'd be the asshole to leave you guys hanging, but my fucking computer decided to shit out a couple weeks ago. I'm all straightened out on the tech front now, but I still have a bit of school work to catch up on so I won't be back until the weekend. That is, if D-Man still wants me to judge.
 
DirtyJosé;3854876 said:
Yeah. This round just seems empty. I see threads going two days without a reply and I get sad. All the little people like to pop off at the mouth from the get go, but where have they all gone?

Unless he comes back with a knockout post, I'm pretty sure you've got this KJ. My other faves for this round include Deaner, Scumm, and Habs. Steve/Mitch is a little too close to call as I don't think either have really dug in with solid punch yet.

Really?:wtf:
 
Man, I'm sorry guys. I really didn't think I'd be the asshole to leave you guys hanging, but my fucking computer decided to shit out a couple weeks ago. I'm all straightened out on the tech front now, but I still have a bit of school work to catch up on so I won't be back until the weekend. That is, if D-Man still wants me to judge.

Totally, bro. I knew of your PC problems and Dagger did a great job of taking over in your absence. But if you're all fixed up now and want to resume the responsibility, it's yours. Just say the word.
 
I'm just wondering why Rattlesnake is boldfacing ever other sentence in his latest reply. If I were a judge, I'd be annoyed to shit at that and it would affect his clarity points. But that's just me.
 
I'm just wondering why Rattlesnake is boldfacing ever other sentence in his latest reply. If I were a judge, I'd be annoyed to shit at that and it would affect his clarity points. But that's just me.

I understand he's pointing things out, but it annoys even me.
 
Jose is a great debater but he can be wrong. Actually he is way off target here, something which you will realise when the judges get down to judging this debate.

I don't like to go into criticisms and such of other people's debates before they are finished, so I'll just start and end with this:

In your latest reply, you used the term "******ed".
 
DirtyJosé;3857153 said:
I don't like to go into criticisms and such of other people's debates before they are finished, so I'll just start and end with this:

In your latest reply, you used the term "******ed".

I feel I have done enough. My arguments are backed up by proof and not ******ed which seems to be what you are implying. We will see, I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top