I don't mind being referred to as a 'wrestling mark' because, funnily enough, the wrestling is what I'm fond of, something I don't see from Cena. And I'd guess it'd be accurate to refer to you as a 'Cena mark' right?
If you knew what the word "mark" meant, you'd realize why you sound silly here.
You're a mark because you buy the story that's being sold. Being a mark has nothing to do with being a fan of something. If I were a fan of Cena, then I'd be a "Cena fan". Sure, we all allow ourselves to be taken in a degree, but your insistence that a good wrestler does certain moves and holds show that you've taken it a step further.
Using your apparent way of thinking, Angle's a "wrestler" because he does hammerlocks and has a submission finisher right? So what would that make the Great Khali? Is he not a wrestler? Of course he is.
EVERYONE who gets in the ring to pretend fight is a wrestler. The style of offense they use has nothing to do with how good of a wrestler they are, and for you to insinuate so, shows you've been "worked" by the business to think that a "real" wrestler is someone like Kurt Angle, and that someone like Khali is not a wrestler, but instead is a brawler.
Do you really think Cena can't do armbars and ankle locks? Hell, I can do that stuff, it's actually some of the easiest moves to pull off. You're a mark because you've been convinced, or worked, to think the only type of "real" wrestler are people like Angle.
That's what makes you a mark; you're someone who can be manipulated by the show to think what the show wants you to think. Like I said, we all allow ourselves to be taken to some degree, but some of us also know where the line is.
You don't seem to.
I'm not going to go into the whole '5 moves of doom' thing, but compared to Joe, Cena has a thinner repertoire to call upon and I like seeing a range and diversity of moves in a wrestling match. I don't think that's so crazy to look for in matches
So now what you're saying is the ONLY thing that makes a good wrestler is the number of offensive moves he puts in his match? Do you realize how silly that is? Not only the fact that the number of moves done has nothing to do with the quality of a wrestler, but the fact you're completely ignoring things like psychology, work rate, selling, charisma, etc.
If the only thing you look for is a range of moves, then I suggest you send away for a wrestling training DVD. I bet they do a lot of moves on one of those. If that's what you look for in matches, then don't even bother with a live product, just watch a training DVD.
Cena himself said, in Legendary (yes I watched, and enjoyed that film) that there are three things that make the perfect wrestler:
Offence
Defence
Psychology
Cena will always be a terrible wrestler until he masters psychology because Dead-Sell Cena to Cartoon Comeback Cena is just useless.
He could be as talented as Benoit or Angle but, until he learns the psychology they mastered, he'll always be classed as terrible in my book
Are you really comparing a movie about freestyle wrestling to a character in professional wrestling? Do you even know what psychology in wrestling is and how it is applied?