No. I am not going to research something for a bar room argument. Watch the news for yourself sometime and you will know these things without having to ask someone else to look it up for you.
Well, if you are going to throw around times and dates as fact, I'd hope you could show what you are talking about, and not just making things up to suite your narrow world view. It's called backing up your shit, try it sometime.
I don't know that a fireball hitting the ground in the center of Detroit wouldn't have killed 3,000 people. Detroit is pretty tightly packed geographically. You don't think it could have hit in a congested area and taken out a large number of people?
Sure, if it had gone through. But it didn't. So it's his fault that it took 3 hours to tell him everything was ok now? Oh, that's right, you're privy to super secret Obama-vision that shows you he had his "do not disturb in case of terrorist" tag out on the door.
If they knew he was connected to trouble, why did they allow him to fly? Is this gross negligence or incompetence. Either way, that argument doesn't help further the idea that Obama isn't the worst President ever.
Um, he didn't board in America, so Obama didn't have much to work with there. Also, you seem to lack a grasp on the law and what you can and can't do legally. What was known was that he knew someone of note, but to what to degree and for what purpose were what the agents on the ground to pick him up were hoping to discover.
By your standard, Bush knew Bin Laden was up to no good. So is it ignorance or incompetence that 12 hostiles were let into the US, and given the tools and training needed to attack us?
Hey look, an obvious lefty giving empty rhetoric and red herring arguments. Way to attack the CIA to deflect attention off the inability of our President to do anything right. You should model your life after him and shoot hoops for the camera instead of creating jobs.
Well, what did you expect; you aren't making any damn sense kid. I don't know what you expected Obama to do. You are mad because it took 3 hours to reach him. You pretend to know why. You won't explain why you think you know that, or where you got that from. So should Obama have just shot the plane down? Is that the American enough answer for you? Or should he have shot the man on sight upon landing? Unlike his predecessor, this President does not act above the law, and proceeded as such. Cry me a river, you are still wrong.
PS: That's filthy liberal to you.
