Before you can use things like this to make everyone believe you are making an informed choice, you need to get facts right regarding certain things. You even mentioned it as a plus for the Undertaker. Hell in a Cell match. Who was Undertakers opponent? Shawn Michaels. Who defeated Undertaker in the first Hell in a cell match? Shawn Michaels. Yes it was with the help of Kane. But you can't use it as a plus for Undertaker and not Shawn Michaels. Continuing from matches. Would you like to tell me who won the first Elimination Chamber? I'll help you. It was Shawn Michaels. He's also been involved in every chamber he's been eligible for (meaning, without the use of ECW and Smackdown chambers). Now, I don't think these are necessarily advantages or disadvantages, but you're misinformed with how you brushed off Shawn's skills copared to the Undertakers. I also think people need to realise Royal Rumble doesn't exactly count as a win/defeat against anyone. Because then we could have a whole load of talentless guys saying they beat the Undertaker, Shawn Michaels, Austin etc. A fair thought? I didn't think so. Oh, and is anything more overrated than The Undertakers 15-0 streak? And I'm saying that as an Undertaker fan.