Wait, so now the Undertaker makes the finals, and miraculously he can't work. What the hell is up with that.
1) I never said that. I just said he pales in comparison to Savage.
2) I've never said that Undertaker was that great of a worker.
Drawing Ability: Both guys were never given the chance to run with the company, so I don't know where that is coming from. Even when Savage was the champion, he was always second fiddle to Hulk Hogan. I really can't see how this can be an argument. Both are well known for different things, and probably about as equal when it comes to name power.
You're kidding with this, right?
With or without Hogan, Savage was still a major draw in a boom time of wrestling. Undertaker's prime drawing period came during the worst era in WWF history.
Ask a 25 year old, they probably know who Randy Savage is, ask anyone under the age of 15, they don't have a clue.
So, because they weren't born yet, that means that Savage wasn't a draw?
Charisma: Again, irrelevant. How exactly is a guy that as you said, A Dead Man, supposed to ask charismatic. He does have charisma, just not in the way that most are used to. He plays the character to perfection, dead men aren't charismatic. If you want the Undertaker's Charisma, see the American Bad Ass, the guy oozed of confidence.
Charisma has nothing to do with gimmick. Undertaker's peak charisma ends approximately the moment the bell rings for the start of the match.
Don't get me wrong, Taker is not a bad worker, but better than Savage in his ability to connect with the fans during a match? C'mon.
Promo Ability: Again, Deadmen don't speak. The Undertaker cuts damn good promos for his character. The American Bad Ass was exceptional on the microphone as well. Savage was great, but the Undertaker when given the chance is just as good.
Undertaker has cut lots of promos in his career, and his best promos don't match up against Savage's promos.
Ability, Psychology, Workrate, Good Matches: Push, push, push, push. Savage is more technically sound, the Undertaker is a brawler, both do there jobs incredibly well. Both deliver almost every time they are out there in the ring. The Undertaker's problem has always been the guys he works with, but even working with crap, the Undertaker can get exceptional matches out of them. As far as good matches, for every good Savage Match, I can probably name a good Undertaker match. If you don't like the Undertaker character, or his style of match, I get it, but it doesn't make him not as good as Savage. It just means you prefer Savage's style.
Again, no one is running down Undertaker's ability, but are you going to sit there and tell me that he can do it better than Savage?
Want to talk about crap workers, let's talk about Savage's match with Crush at Wrestlemania 10. And Undertaker has NEVER had a match like Savage has had with both Ricky Steamboat and The Ultimate Warrior.
And Undertaker has worked with his fair share of quality wrestlers as well.
Personally, Savage is going to be spent.
Spent on what? Energy?
I mean, look at The Undertaker's opponents...Justin Credible in an ECW match, Harley Race, Yokozuna, Mick Foley and The Big Show....all in a hardcore environment.
So, somehow Savage is going to be more spent than Taker, despite Taker taking on a former ECW champion in an ECW match, a Hall of Famer, a 700 pound monster, a man who has no qualms about killing himself to win, and a 500 pound monster who knocked Chris Jericho out with one punch?
Where did you get that logic from?
Then, he has to face Shawn Michaels in the semi-finals, who is every bit as tough of an opponent as Vader. Want proof? Michaels pinned Vader in 1996 Summerslam.
So, by no logic can anyone say that Taker has had an easier road to the Finals, and thus should be in better condition.
This isn't Wrestlemania 4 and Hulk Hogan isn't waiting for a steal chair. This isn't the One Man Gang, the Giant, or any other Super Heavyweight, this is the Undertaker, the greatest big man in the history of the business.
The greatest big man in the history of the business?
Shocky, I understand you're pulling for Undertaker, but there is no need to make things up. Undertaker ain't got nothing on someone like Vader, Brody, Hanson, or even if you count him, Hulk Hogan.
The only way Undertaker should win this match, is if Savage falls asleep during Undertakers 3 hour long entrance, and forgets to wake up in time.
Savage is a great, phenomenal worker (number 11 on my personal favorites), but the Undertaker is a legend.
And Savage isn't?
THE UNDERTAKER is a smark favorite???? And Savage ISNT???
Well, apparently because some people are under the age of 15, Savage shouldn't be getting votes.
LOL....then please explain to me how someone who accomplished basically nothing of great consequence over his carreer is in the finals right now???
When you say "nothing of great consequence" are you doing that before or after considering his 6 World Titles in the biggest wrestling promotions in the history of wrestling?
Not to mention the titles he won during his regional promotions work.
Even during the time he was givemn the belt, He was never over Hogan, has was never booked to go over Hogan, and during his time on top, it was all about the Mega powers storyline.
Then Hulk Hogan should win this damn tournament because there has not been a single person bigger than Hulk Hogan in the history of wrestling.
He is famous for preforming well in losing efforts which is THE magnet for IWC love.
I wasn't aware he lost in his Wrestlemania 8 match vs. Flair, or his Wrestlemania 10 match vs. Crush.
I guess I'll have to go watch those again.
Just becuase The Undertaker doesnt dance sing and jump around like an ass clown, doesnt mean he lacks charisma. WTF is the character SUPPOSED to be played as??? Is the funeral music supposed to start followed by Taker breakdancing on card board boxes on the stage?? He is a FUCKING DEAD GUY, Last time I checked, dead dudes dont do a whole lot.
Charisma is about connecting with the crowd, not all that other stupid stuff you said. It doesn't matter what gimmick you have, you can still connect with the crowd.
I mean, Umaga is a savage beast who can connect with a crowd.
And still, I love how the two IWC babies, Savage and HBK's supporters are convieniently choosing to just totally ignore the way this tournament is set up. As much as anyone wants to debate it, or disagree with the results, Taker has just simply had a MUCH easier raod to get to this point.
How do you figure, considering what I posted above?
Savages only advantage over Taker is his speed and agility, which by this time, becuase of fatigue, is basically all but gone. He cant run from Taker, and stick and move, if he is on the brink of total exhaustion. Taker will catch him, and break him.
Yes, because as we all know, Savage was stick person.
Please. Have you actually watched Savage wrestle. The man was very strong, very resilient, very quick, and had great stamina and endurance. Undertaker on the other hand, is slow, no stronger than Savage, and is not in as good of cario-respiratory condition. And, when people get exhausted, it's not just speed and agility which leave you, it's strength as well.
By the way, I wasn't aware that all of these matches were occurring in one night.