You're talking about isolated incidents. Of course there are going to be exceptions. But to say that CM Punk isn't cheered the majority of times he comes out to wrestle would be a fallacy. Because he is cheered. And he is over.
C.M. Punk when he debuted with those 'Straight Edge' promos for weeks before ever entering the W.W.E., never got over. Most people I know looked at Punk as trying to claim he was unofficially better than everyone else simply because he didn't make the same human errors as they did.
Finally, when he did debut, his finisher was a submission hold that barely got any type of pop whatsoever. It wasn't until the G.T.S. & Kelly Kelly did people start taking notice. (isn't it odd, how a diva is always brought in to get a guy over?)
Then, you jump ahead to Survivor Series when its arguable that Punk was indeed the most over guy in that match, that also included Triple H. & Shawn Michaels. HOWEVER.. I see that "over" pop that he received as being false however as a way for the fans to cheer for the crappiest guy in the group. (remember Eugene's ungawdly pops?)
Thats an odd explanation for Punk being over, and one I can say I've never heard before about any wrestler. Typically shouldn't that mean that any face who comes out first should get the same reactions as Punk does on ECW? I can't imagine Stevie Richards would get the same reaction if he came out first.
The only reason I argue this being one of the main reasons is because when you attend a live event, you're syked and pumped to just get into cheering for anyone.
Several live events I've attended, people popped louder for seeing Val Venis take on a jobber just because Venis was the first known guy to come out through the curtain. When you go to an E.C.W. taping, you don't get very many top quality names to 'cheer' for.. Punk unofficially wins by default in that brand.
If Punk jumps to Raw, he'll be taking Super Crazy's position in jobbing within a year. If he jumps to Smackdown, he might have a chance to be a midcarder, who always comes up short to win a Championship. (not saying he never will for a period of time, it just won't be meaningful -- and I'll be downright shocked if they actually go through with giving him a World Heavyweight Championship that isn't the E.C.W. title)
Come on now, everyone you just named has 10+ years in this business, whereas CM Punk is still relatively new to the professional wrestling business. And you named some of the biggest heels and faces in the WWE (and of course the guy who sells beer; god bless that balding, overweight man with hair on his knuckles) so I can't imagine thats a very fair comparison to make when Punk has only been in the WWE for about a year and a half.
So then Punk would fit into the same group as Mr. Kennedy, M.V.P., Cody Rhodes, John Morrison, Kofi Kingston, & possibly a couple others. Correct?
Look at all those names.
Kennedy & M.V.P. - are arguably the top two future guys in the business. They always receive some type of heat, especially M.V.P.
Cody Rhodes - Received one of the biggest pops/pushes in a failing effort against Randy Orton & the fans latched onto him quicker than anything. I still have no reason for it. Granted, right now hes drowning in a crappy Tag Team division, but hes the Champion of it.
John Morrison - I would argue until I had no breath left that Morrison is more over than Punk. He has more talent, he has a better look, better mic skills, and he was put over Punk on countless occations during their E.C.W. Championship feud. In fact, the ONLY reason Punk went over him in the end, is because Morrison was apart of the steroid scandal.
Kingston - Will pass Punk up within this year, if not definately by next year.
I'd disagree Will, Matt Hardy has always been over with the fans; he's a Hardy for chrissakes! The fans will cheer anyone with the last name Hardy who takes their shirt off during matches; that is a theory that is tried and true in my book.
But the majority of people cheering for a Hardy when he rips his Hoganized shirt off are all females & Konnan. Sure they have an opinion, but its a very one sided opinion based on who has the better looks.
I get what you're saying though. If put against one of the more hated heels, the face will get a better reaction; I don't think thats the case with CM Punk at all though, because his situation has been inherently different that Matt Hardy's has been.
Punk is over in a different kinda way than Matt, because Matt went over huge due to real life issues. Whereas (to me) Punk is receiving a Eugene type push. The fans want to show up creative so much that they feel the guy is crap.. that they cheer the shit outta him, just to see how long before W.W.E. gives up on him willingly.
Totally agreed. His logo is a very eye-pleasing thing; still, it doesn't change the fact that those with those signs are CM Punk fans; I can't imagine someone putting up his logo if they weren't.
I agree that most people would be dull-minded to draw tons of logos of guys they didn't like. However its not that it hasn't been done before. And I've seen several signs of people who steal the logo design, only to add their own name or something else in.
That doesn't mean they have to like the guy, it just means they like the design.
As for the kids and females comment, isn't that the same complaint always made about Cena? Seems like a fallacy to me; women & children have ALWAYS, ALWAYS been the biggest supporters of face wrestlers; thats a fact of life. From Hogan to Sting to The Rock to John Cena. Men seem more likely to cheer for a heel for some reason. Still, I hardly see how that somehow makes his fans invalid or something; women and children count just as much as teenage guys do.
The Women & Children act has been played out since the days of sinking ships. Frankly while I agree their opinion is on par with that of males.. they don't know half the shit about the industry that males do. (barring a very rare few - such as our very own female members)
However look at why MOST females cheer for a selective guy.. hes "hot." Look at why most children cheer for a selective guy.. hes a "hero." Of course they aren't going to boo him, but you do come across several more knowing female & children fans that think Punk is plain and boring.
I'm not saying the guy ISN'T talented, I'm merely saying he doesn't deserve what hes current in line for, and hes only even considered for it due to a Hardy screw-up. Punk was drowning on the E.C.W. brand when he was taking clean losses to the guy who got squashed on the Mania stage. How's THAT look on a record?