Who is better in the ring: Cena or Edge?

So because Cena has this "limited moveset", he's less of a wrestler than Edge.

thats one reason

Everyone has a limited moveset and does the same moves night in and night out so don't come on here and act like Cena's the only one.

I have seen the exact same match and the same exact two finishes out of Cena matches for five years now. Edge has a different match every week and they have all been entertaining.

You haven't given one reason why Edge is better in the ring than Cena so I don't take your opinion seriously until you bring some better arguments. Cena tells a story in the ring better and gets the crowd involved better than Edge.

What story? That you can't keep a good man down. That if you have drive and determination anything is possible. Give me a break, even twelve year olds have to get sick of having that Saturday morning cartoon bullshit shoved down their throats every week. Edge has told plenty of stories in his matches too. That's not all its about.

Let's go through your argument and the logic you used. Edge is better because you've been entertained more by his matches? I've been entertained by more Evan Bourne matches than Shawn Michaels but do I think he is better than HBK. No he isn't and I've never been an HBK fan but even I can see he is better than Bourne.

Seeing as how HBK has been wrestling for twenty years and Bourne is a dam rookie for you to insinuate that Bourne would be better would be asinine. But since Edge and Cena have both been around the block it's a fair assumption to make that after six years of watching both I can say that I've been entertained by more Edge matches not even including gimmick matches and say thats a fair meter to go by when judging his in-ring ability.

For future reference, check your facts before you put them on here before you get seriously embarrased. Edge has only had one TLC match at Wrestemania and he and John Cena haven't wrestled in a ladder match this year. I guess you can like those overrated Undertaker matches. It is your preference after all.

So what if the first one was a Triangle Ladder Match they used tables same shit different name. Get your facts straight they had two more afterward at Wrestlemania. I also didn't say he had a ladder match with Cena this year or ever I said he had a ladder match with Hardy this year and I mentioned a TLC match with Cena but never named the year but it was the one at Unforgiven 2006 if you must know. I guess I do like those overrated Undertaker matches they were way better than any of those overrated Cena matches. lol

I haven't seen a greater Edge match since he became a main eventer other than he was facing John Cena. Edge's best matches have come against Cena but Cena's best matches haven't come against Edge. Cena brought out the best matches Umaga and The Great Khali ever had. He brought out the best match Bobby Lashley ever had. His matches with Orton are the best Orton has had in almost five years. His matches with HBK and HHH have been good.

How bout any of his matches with Undertaker oh wait those are overrated so they don't count. How bout his matches with Jeff Hardy or Batista. Come on saying he had great matches with Umaga and Khali when Khali is garbage and at that point so was Umaga. The best match Lashley ever had isn't saying much Lashley is crap too. Orton had many good matches with the Undertaker,Edge,Triple H,and Chris Benoit. Most of his matches with Cena were dull except the one at Summerslam 2007. His matches with HBK have been great but my sock could have a good match with him and his matches with HHH were awful.

John Cena has always managed to bring the best out of his opponents and that is what matters of being good in the ring. Do you think Edge would have faced these same opponents and gotten the same great matches out of them? They would not because Edge isn't versatile enough to face those opponents. Cena can brawl with superheavyweights and Edge doesn't have the style to face those superheavyweights and get the same great matches that Cena has. Edge is good, but not as good as John Cena.

So because Cena can have decent matches with crappy big men he is a better in-ring wrestler than Edge? Terrible criteria. None of those matches you mentioned were any good. Edge having any sort of chance against a guy like Khali would be silly because he is small compared to Cena. Your not logical at all. Edge is a better in-ring worker than Cena hands down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: X
personally i think this is one of the most one sided debate's in this forum,(with all due respect to kb)cena is ok,not completely crap, but still not good,too predictable to stiff, to annoying, to boring he is just there, edge is one of the most versatile wrestlers there is he can have great gimmick and non gimmick matches,matches are different, not to predictable like cena, he can pull a different move out of nowhere,and is original/unique, edge all the way, holla!
 
thats one reason



I have seen the exact same match and the same exact two finishes out of Cena matches for five years now. Edge has a different match every week and they have all been entertaining.



What story? That you can't keep a good man down. That if you have drive and determination anything is possible. Give me a break, even twelve year olds have to get sick of having that Saturday morning cartoon bullshit shoved down their throats every week. Edge has told plenty of stories in his matches too. That's not all its about.



Seeing as how HBK has been wrestling for twenty years and Bourne is a dam rookie for you to insinuate that Bourne would be better would be asinine. But since Edge and Cena have both been around the block it's a fair assumption to make that after six years of watching both I can say that I've been entertained by more Edge matches not even including gimmick matches and say thats a fair meter to go by when judging his in-ring ability.



So what if the first one was a Triangle Ladder Match they used tables same shit different name. Get your facts straight they had two more afterward at Wrestlemania. I also didn't say he had a ladder match with Cena this year or ever I said he had a ladder match with Hardy this year and I mentioned a TLC match with Cena but never named the year but it was the one at Unforgiven 2006 if you must know. I guess I do like those overrated Undertaker matches they were way better than any of those overrated Cena matches. lol



How bout any of his matches with Undertaker oh wait those are overrated so they don't count. How bout his matches with Jeff Hardy or Batista. Come on saying he had great matches with Umaga and Khali when Khali is garbage and at that point so was Umaga. The best match Lashley ever had isn't saying much Lashley is crap too. Orton had many good matches with the Undertaker,Edge,Triple H,and Chris Benoit. Most of his matches with Cena were dull except the one at Summerslam 2007. His matches with HBK have been great but my sock could have a good match with him and his matches with HHH were awful.



So because Cena can have decent matches with crappy big men he is a better in-ring wrestler than Edge? Terrible criteria. None of those matches you mentioned were any good. Edge having any sort of chance against a guy like Khali would be silly because he is small compared to Cena. Your not logical at all. Edge is a better in-ring worker than Cena hands down.

1. That cartoon bullshit worked pretty well for Hogan did it not. It's still a story and Cena tells it in the ring better than anybody else currently in the WWE.

2. I believe it was you who said "three classic Wrestlemania TLC matches". Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't he have only one. You may be counting his two MITB matches but tables weren't used in those matches. I thought you were better than this.

3. Explain to me how Khali and Umaga were garbage at the time Cena faced them. Khali had a convincing win over the Undertaker and had never been pinned or submitted until he faced Cena. Umaga was unbeaten until he faced Cena in one of Cena's best matches at the Royal Rumble. Khali won the world title no less than a month after losing to Cena so it didn't affect him any.

4. Has Edge ever had a good match with a big guy? I can't think of one that comes to mind. Cena can wrestle different kinds of opponents with a different variety of styles moreso than Edge and that is part of what makes Cena better in the ring than Edge. Where is your criteria other than "Edge has entertained me more" which is almost as lame as it can get.
 
Until Cena can prove that he can go into all matches known to man, then he can be near Edge's level of ability. People under estimate Edge's experience, hes been in the the company since 1998, hes been in the ring with everyone imaginable. 11 years in the company hes learnt from the best. Cena has been here since 2002, and didnt get a real push till 2003, and hasnt been in that many profile matches unless someone can tell me one where he wrestled amazingly. So my answer is Edge.
 
Until Cena can prove that he can go into all matches known to man, then he can be near Edge's level of ability. People under estimate Edge's experience, hes been in the the company since 1998, hes been in the ring with everyone imaginable. 11 years in the company hes learnt from the best. Cena has been here since 2002, and didnt get a real push till 2003, and hasnt been in that many profile matches unless someone can tell me one where he wrestled amazingly. So my answer is Edge.

That statement is so ridiculous but I have to reply to it. What do you mean by "all matches know to man"? He has not been in the ring with everyone imaginable. Edge and Lashley never fought so there goes your argument. Cena's matches against HHH, HBK, Khali, Umaga, Orton, Lashley, JBL, and Batista weren't profile enough for you. Don't forget his matches with RVD and Booker T. I guess those weren't profile enough as well. Cena has fought the best in the WWE and he has beaten the best in the WWE. He's beaten small and big wrestlers in hardcore and non-hardcore matches. He is one of the best versatile wrestlers in the WWE and he is better than Edge in the ring.

Will someone please come to this thread with a better pro-Edge argument?
 
Without a doubt, It's Edge, he is the better wrestler. Now I know I can bring up the "Cena only does 5 moves" crap, but I wont do that. If you watch some of their other matches, look closely at the way the wrestle each other. Edge just looks smoother in the ring, and is more unpredictable than Cena. With Edge, you will never know what he is going to do next. With Cena, its the same routine every single time. Cena also performs some of his moves very stiffly. With Edge, you will rarely, if ever, see him perform a stiff move.
 
and hasnt been in that many profile matches unless someone can tell me one where he wrestled amazingly. So my answer is Edge.

1, Cena v. Edge Unforgiven
2, Cena v. Michaels on Raw, that match went an hour
3, Cena v. RVD One Night Stand
4, Cena v. Orton Summerslam
5, Cena v. HHH Mania
6, Cena v. Umaga Rumble
7, Cena v. Orton Ironman match

Just off the top of my head, quality Cena matches.

People on here won't stop bashing Cena unless he magically got the technical skills of Kurt Angle.

To have a quality wrestling match you don't need to have someone be a quality technical worker.
 
Without a doubt, It's Edge, he is the better wrestler. Now I know I can bring up the "Cena only does 5 moves" crap, but I wont do that. If you watch some of their other matches, look closely at the way the wrestle each other. Edge just looks smoother in the ring, and is more unpredictable than Cena. With Edge, you will never know what he is going to do next. With Cena, its the same routine every single time. Cena also performs some of his moves very stiffly. With Edge, you will rarely, if ever, see him perform a stiff move.

Why won't people understand that unpredictability is not an indicator of being great in the ring. Hogan and Austin did the same old stuff in the ring but they are considered the greatest of all time. HHH and HBK do the routine every single time and they have been highly successful. If you can show me evidence that Cena performs his moves stiffly and Edge doesn't, I'll appreciate it.

Nice try though.
 
If this is based solely on movesets , I have to say Edge, as I think he has a larger moveset then Cena, not to say Cena " only has 5 moves " but I think I've seen more out of Edge then I have Cena. But if this is based on entertainment value, it is hard to say. Both men have been in high profile matches again and again. Edge is an innovator of TLC, and, as far as I'm concerned, one of the last people to come from the tag team ranks all the way to main event status.

Cena on the other hand, helped usher in a new era in the WWE, one that everyone bitches and complains about, but flares up every once in a while. However this is off of the topic , so to get back on topic. I will say Edge is better in the ring, for one reason and one reason alone. He gets the proper responses out of the crowd. Edge has been a heel for the major part of the last 5 years, maybe longer, and he's been booed a hell of a lot since then. He garners heat excellently, and he knows how to get the crowd to hate him more and more.

Now I know, you can say Cena gets cheered like mad, the crowds love him. Yes this may be true, however, Cena does receive quite a fair amount of boos. And to me, this makes Edge better then him. To me, for a wrestler to be great in the ring, it takes a few things. You have to be good on the mic, have to be good in the ring, have good ring psychology, and get the proper response of out the fans.

Now I realize, Cena is loved by the masses, and he does all of this to a tee, however, I feel Edge is better then Cena based on the reasons stated above. And for those of you who say one or the other has not been in a high profile matches, just look at their track record against each other, some of the better matches these two have had have been against each other.
 
Edge by far. I'm not a Cena Hater or a Cena Lover, I respect the fact he tries to be honest; but he's not as good as Edge and he never will be. Edge has every aspect of a great in-ring technician down pat, he can sell his opponent's moves like they're the deadliest thing he's ever been hit with, he can deliver his own with intensity and believeablity and just his all around workrate; i would define it as Benoit's back in the day. Cena has all these traits as well, dont get me wrong but, Edge is just much better at it.
 
Wow, another Cena bashing thread ay.

Look, Cena puts on the better show, entertains more in the ring and tells a better story. Edge is pretty damn good too and I did find it hard to pick a better wrestler but I have to go Cena, he's just slightly better. Cena all the way here, I'll leave it to Little Jerry Lawler to put these Cena haters in their place.

Cena FTW here and good posts from LJL, great posts.
 
Well this is obviously a no brainer. Edge has been in far more great matches than Cena. In fact Cena has only had a few matches that have been good "wrestling" matches. Cena is an entertainer and nothing more.
 
Well this is obviously a no brainer. Edge has been in far more great matches than Cena. In fact Cena has only had a few matches that have been good "wrestling" matches. Cena is an entertainer and nothing more.

My work on this thread is never done.

Professional wrestler and entertainer are the same thing so Cena is an entertainer just like Edge is. Cena has been in great matches with HHH, HBK, Khali, Umaga, Orton, and the list goes on. Being in more great matches simply does not mean you are better in the ring and I wish people like you would understand this but you won't.

:disappointed:
 
Honestly IMO I would say Edge mainly because I am a huge fan of technical wrestling and Edge definitely can put on a show of technical ability. That being said I truly believe this is like comparing apples and oranges. Cena has his style and Edge has his. Their styles are different, but they meshed very well in the ring. I personally loved the rivalry between these two and I hope one day it happens again. To me, though, Edge is the better wrestler and I feel that he is better in every way than Cena both in and out of the ring. Although, Cena of course IS the workhorse of the company and I agree with Paradox that Cena isnt too far away from Edge's abilities, but like I said, I dont see a truly possible comparison between the two.
 
When I first read this thread I thought, Edge wins no brainer. But then I thought about it. I realized that there is a lot to being a wrestler and it's not just about pure technical ability. I'm going to list certain categories which I feel are most important for professional wrestlers and then list who wins what category. Winner is the guy who wins the most categories. So simple even a smark could get it. Let me warn you, this will be long.

1) Promos. Who cuts better promos? Now John Cena can cut a promo a lot better than people here will say. John Cena is very underrated on the mic and he can at times be very convincing. That said, I can't go against Edge here. The guy is just awesome on the mic and can really convince a crowd. Edge 1-0

2) Better Feuds. Edge has been in the business longer and thus has been in much more memorable feuds so this already favors him. Over the past few years I have really clued in closely on these two guys and the feuds that they had. John Cena has had some really good ones. He had Orton (1st time), HBK, HHH, Umaga, and almost every fued he's in really draws my attention. That said, I can't miss an Edge feud. He is the best at making business personal. Edge leads 2-0.

3) Better Seller? Who can sell moves better? This category is as tough as they come to pick. Both superstars are very good sellers. John Cena can make anyone look legit. He made a match with Swagger gold and while they were both good wrestlers, Cena sold all of Swaggers moves perfectly. Edge on the other hand does the same. He takes a lot of bumps and falls and makes them all look very painful. After dwelling, I give this category slightly to Cena. Edge leads 2-1.

4) Best PPV performer. Really, it mostly depends on how you do on the big stage. This question is who is better when all the money is on the table. John Cena held the belt for over a year. In that time, all of his PPV matches were very good. He always brought his A-game for PPVs. I'm going with recent history for Edge as I feel that's all that is relevant. Edge's PPV matches were outstanding. He's done almost every kind of match, taken every kind of bump, and everytime I look at a good match, I see Edge. Very close call here, but John Cena's lackluster feud with Big Show gives Edge the win. It should be noted though that if Edge feuded with Show over PPVs, Cena could have easily taken this. Edge leads 3-1.

5) More believable. You really can't compare the ultimate babyface to a psycho heel. It's up to the viewer to make you truly believe them. John Cena is a believable face. In his promos he preaches about hustle, loyalty, and respect. Listening to a Cena promo and watching what he does, you think, wow this guy is the face of the company. Even when he's not chasing or holding the belt, he exudes that he is the guy. Edge on the other hand makes you feel, I hate this guy. When I first became a fan of his, because I used to hate the guy badly, I thought he was the world's biggest douchebag. After thinking about it, I realized that it's his job to make you hate him and he did it successfully time and time again. I'm going to give this to Cena. Edge has to be in a title feud to exude what Cena does, but Cena can do it when not chasing/holding. 3-2 Edge.

6) Better technical wrestler. John Cena is not a technical guy. He's got a limited moveset and I feel that hurts him here. Most people look at the "5 moves of doom" or whatever, but he's got more than that. That said, he's just not as technically sound as Edge is. 4-2 Edge

7) Better finisher. It's really the thing. Who has a finishing move that makes you say, it's over. John Cena has two really, the AA and STF. But what will give Cena the win is the multiple ways he uses these. It's not simply guy gets up from the shuffle and walks into the AA, and it's not a drop toehold out of nowhere and STF. The IWC thinks that but really they're not watching. John Cena has that power game and he can turn any hold into an AA or STF. He's good at changing an opponents finisher into one of those moves. He is also very good at modifying his moves to the scenario like his LMS with Umaga. Edge's spear is good and can come from out of nowhere, but he can't really apply it the many ways Cena can. 4-3 Edge.

8) Better champion. This category kills Edge. I love an Edge title reign as much as the next guy. I think that when he actually retains his belt, he does it very well. However his reigns are always just so short. Meanwhile, I never tired of Cena's year long reign. Booking plays a big role in this, but it is an important category. I like both of these guys as champs, but I gotta give it to Cena. Tied at 4.

9) Durability. Another important category. You can't perform if you're hurt. There's no way. Edge gets hurt a lot. He takes a lot of time to heal mostly because he takes so many bumps. Cena on the other hand doesn't take as many vicious ones and he benefits from it. Edge has had two belts from him removed due to injury and Cena returned early from a very bad injury to win the rumble. Gotta give it to Cena. 5-4 Cena.

10) Who is more versitle? This deals with is he a good face AND heel and how they can do both. Edge has been the slime ball for a while, while Cena has been the bend but not break guy for a while. I saw some of Cena's older rapper stuff and I found it like a muscular K-fed. I didn't like his heel work as much as everyone else. Edge though, in his feud with Christian for the title was a very convincing face and made you just want to cheer for him. I liked Edge's combined face/heel work much better than Cena's. Tied at five.

Last Category) Making younger stars. It's not about how your career is, it's how you aid the next generation. Which of these guys is better at making another star? It's appropriate that these two guys tie is broken by arguably the most important one. Now, let's start with Cena as usual. John Cena can build stars well in my opinion. He's a bit to young yet, but we are already seeing his work with Sheamus. In every encounter, Cena has made Sheamus look like a big deal. Only time will tell how this ends, but Cena is a guy who makes everyone look better just by being in a fued with him. Edge now is a master at this as well. He got people to care about the second Hardy. His actions left a hole open for Matt to just run through and eclipse Jeff for the last time. Matt didn't take it, but looking back at Edge's career it would be very tough for me to say that Edge hasn't built Superstars. His work is all around. That said, I have to give it to Cena. As I said, everytime he's in the ring, the other guy's starpower raises and sometimes he can take a "weak link" and make him a showstopper. John Cena wins the contest 6-5.

It's tough when you look at everything that it takes to be a superstar and these two are very good when you look at their work closely. However, when you look at the total package, I have to say that Cena is better. Whether that's due to booking or not is irrelevant in my book.
 
My work on this thread is never done.

Professional wrestler and entertainer are the same thing so Cena is an entertainer just like Edge is. Cena has been in great matches with HHH, HBK, Khali, Umaga, Orton, and the list goes on. Being in more great matches simply does not mean you are better in the ring and I wish people like you would understand this but you won't.

:disappointed:

Will you get off of Sly's dick? Seriously Professional wrestler and entertainer are the same thing you are right. But when the question was who is a better in-ring performer as in who between the ropes in a match has better more entertaining matches then the answer is Edge. If you think John Cena great for you thats why there is a thread. Edge has been in great matches with those people too and has had more great matches therefore it does mean he is better in the ring. I wish people like you would understand this but you won't.
 
in the ring... i would have to say Edge. I'm not bashing Cena i think he's good in ring too. but Edge is just more quick, agile and technical in the ring than Cena. Edge takes more blows and has given his everything. could cena do a spear of a 20 ft ladder? Edge just has that better presence.

so im gonna say edge
 
Will you get off of Sly's dick? Seriously Professional wrestler and entertainer are the same thing you are right. But when the question was who is a better in-ring performer as in who between the ropes in a match has better more entertaining matches then the answer is Edge. If you think John Cena great for you thats why there is a thread. Edge has been in great matches with those people too and has had more great matches therefore it does mean he is better in the ring. I wish people like you would understand this but you won't.

It's cute that you think of Sly when you read my post because there have been plenty others who have thought the same way. I'll let Sly know how you feel next time I'm on his dick. :rolleyes:

On occasion I find an Evan Bourne match to be more entertaining than an Edge match but do I think Bourne is better in the ring than Edge. No I do not. Name me all these great matches Edge has had in the ring and I guarantee I will name more greater Cena matches thus by your logic proving that Cena is better in the ring.
 
in the ring... i would have to say Edge. I'm not bashing Cena i think he's good in ring too. but Edge is just more quick, agile and technical in the ring than Cena. Edge takes more blows and has given his everything. could cena do a spear of a 20 ft ladder? Edge just has that better presence.

so im gonna say edge

The problem everyone seems to be having is that Cena is worse than Edge because he doesn't do the high risk spots Edge does. Cena doesn't need to do those things because he is a entirely different wrestler than Edge. Why does Cena need to do a spear of a ladder when he did a pretty good job giving Edge a FU off the ladder. You don't have to do high risk spots to become a good wrestler. HHH, Flair, and Hogan never did that many high risk spots and look how successful they are. Cena has a different style than Edge and he does his style better than anyone else.
 
Blah blah blah, Cena doesn't need to do this, doesn't need to do that, he can work a crowd that's all that matters, hoo-hoo ha ha diddly-fucking-do we've heard it a million and five times LJL, from you, from Sly, from everyone and their mother on this board.

This thread is not about how to work a crowd in a match. That requires a completely different set of skills than those that we're judging here, which is pure wrestling talent and ability in the ring. You can be a fantastic worker but if you don't have the charisma, you won't get over in the United States. This thread is about pure in-ring ability here, and in that regard Edge has Cena beat, and I find it pretty ridiculous that you people are actually arguing this.

Go watch Edge's match with Angle, the Hair vs. Hair match. That match right there should prove to you why Edge is better in the ring, because he isn't capable of performing many of the same maneuvers that Edge can. Why can't you just accept this? We're not talking about who is the better all-around wrestler PACKAGE (which includes things like charisma, mic skills, etc), we're strictly talking about workrate here. And in that regard Edge has Cena thoroughly beaten.
 
Well, based on experience and ways to work around different matches, Edge is by far the better wrestler from the pair. I am not talking about characters but in ring technique and psycology.

Edge can adapt to multiple opponents and start throwing out a lot of different moves, like someone else said, He has been so adaptable to the pace of time that has changed finishers and submissinon moves during his tenure and has incorporated different ways to apply moves. Like nowadays he applies his version of the Sharpshooter and before that he used a more difficult version of the move on the Edgecator. He uses now the Spear as finisher eventhough it could be considered weak because a lot of guys use it as a transitional move (himself included in the past) because it has worked for him as Heel finisher and he can throw it literally from any position he wants. Cena is a good wreslter and uses good psycology, not question about that (proof enough was the iron man Match), but has become to confortable with his current moveset, so much that psycologically his match with Orton was not based in a ton of moves, but required a lot of outside brawl and all his falls finished with his 2 finishers, 3 with AA and 2 with the STF, it didn't really took away from the match, which was pretty damn good, but would have been better if he used more moves on that one.


Edge on the other hand is a guy who when he is willing can have a great match with almost anyone, and that is why the guy is a 9 time World champion, because even if the WWE does not trust him to carry the ball for a long time (got to face it, unfortunatelly for the guy, everytime he is on top something happens to him, injuries, HHH going to Smackdown, etc.), every time the WWE tries to rejuvenate someone, or push someone or make things interesting, He is the "Go to" guy of the company and that is also why when he comes back from injuries, eventhough he is the bad guy, people cheer for him, like when he won the WWE title at Survivor Series 2008 or the Second Elimination Chamber at NWO 2009.
 
Well, based on experience and ways to work around different matches, Edge is by far the better wrestler from the pair. I am not talking about characters but in ring technique and psycology.

Edge can adapt to multiple opponents and start throwing out a lot of different moves, like someone else said, He has been so adaptable to the pace of time that has changed finishers and submissinon moves during his tenure and has incorporated different ways to apply moves. Like nowadays he applies his version of the Sharpshooter and before that he used a more difficult version of the move on the Edgecator. He uses now the Spear as finisher eventhough it could be considered weak because a lot of guys use it as a transitional move (himself included in the past) because it has worked for him as Heel finisher and he can throw it literally from any position he wants. Cena is a good wreslter and uses good psycology, not question about that (proof enough was the iron man Match), but has become to confortable with his current moveset, so much that psycologically his match with Orton was not based in a ton of moves, but required a lot of outside brawl and all his falls finished with his 2 finishers, 3 with AA and 2 with the STF, it didn't really took away from the match, which was pretty damn good, but would have been better if he used more moves on that one.


Edge on the other hand is a guy who when he is willing can have a great match with almost anyone, and that is why the guy is a 9 time World champion, because even if the WWE does not trust him to carry the ball for a long time (got to face it, unfortunatelly for the guy, everytime he is on top something happens to him, injuries, HHH going to Smackdown, etc.), every time the WWE tries to rejuvenate someone, or push someone or make things interesting, He is the "Go to" guy of the company and that is also why when he comes back from injuries, eventhough he is the bad guy, people cheer for him, like when he won the WWE title at Survivor Series 2008 or the Second Elimination Chamber at NWO 2009.

Edge hasn't used the Edgecator for long and the majority of his career he has used the spear as his finisher. You talk about Edge adapting to multiple opponents when Cena has done the same thing and done it better. Cena has had great matches with big guys and small guys, aerial guys and power guys. Cena is still the "go-to" guy of the company and Edge has only been that on Smackdown.
 
I would say Edge but not by a lot. Cena has made great strides in improving in some areas that very few people notice such as psychology. He has done a better job of selling the moves well without overselling them. For example, John Cena from 3-4 years ago would take a move, sell the beatdown for 10 minute then miraculously regain all of his energy, do his 5 moves and win the match. John Cena of today does a better job of not selling every move he takes as death while still selling enough to make his opponent look good. And when it comes to comeback he doesn't forget that he has been getting beaten down for the 5-10 minutes prior to making his come back and does little things that are very important to acknowledge it which in my opinion adds to the match quality. Also, he has developed spots for different opponents, not only on the offensive end but defensive as well. The way he knocks the stairs out of the way, the way he sells big show's shoulder block, how sometimes he will do 1 shoulder tackle then have his opponent dodge the second one,etc.
 
Cena and Edge are pretty much even in my books. Everyone says Cena can't do the same shit Edge does, but he's done it. Ladder matches, TLC matches, Street Fights. Just about every match there is John Cena has done it, and done it well. He's kept you entertained. Cena definitely kept up with Edge in their TLC match. Everybody just says Edge automatically because his moveset is a bit larger then Cena. He does alot of the same stuff over and over again too, so in reality he's not that much better then Cena on that part. I say it's a tie. Both can get it done in the ring, both can put on very very entertaining matches.
 
So Cena is better in the ring because he is capable of doing high-risk maneuvers. I guess that means Shelton Benjamin is better in the ring than Cena. Cena doesn't need to do high risk moves in the ring to perform a great match and most of the time that is what Edge has to do and that does not make the mark of a great wrestler.

Ummm with the quote you put on this comment and the comment you made, you just contradicted yourself. I could tell you meant to say "so edge is better in the ring cause he is capable of doing high risk maneuvers" and if you weren't being sarcastic you'd be right.

Edge isn't just better because he can do high risk moves, he's better because, quite simply he does everything better then Cena except cut a promo. And yes Shelton Benjamin IS better in the ring then Cena, too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,834
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top