HamSwissman
Occasional Pre-Show
Meh, not really. As has been pointed out, it's mostly due to heavier endorsements with PG which leads to more revenue, as well as the Chris Benoit tragedy that were the prime catalysts.
(Though actually in recent quarters profits have still gone down regardless. I might just check WWE's stock history and compare revenue rates from PG compared to before PG. It could be an interesting exercise.)
One could argue that Cena was attracting that age group to the product and thus WWE responded to that signal, but it would be indirect. Cena is not the WWE's board of directors so he wouldn't be able to make that kind of a decision. I doubt he'd even lobby for it.
As for the conference, I saw the edited video and was like "lolCenagottrolled." But after hearing the full scope, it was too far. I dislike Cena's character as well but I wouldn't boo his person outside of the show. The Fruity Pebbles was way too far.
I agree that throwing anything is going too far. However, this was a WWE sanctioned conference. Triple H didn't show up as Paul Levesque, etc. They were booing the John Cena character. Again, I understand where they are coming from, even if I don't agree. They have a right to let their opinions be heard. I, like an earlier poster mentioned, am more annoyed at the blatant censorship of the negative reactions that WWE always manage to get away with. They could bleep the expletives if they like, but for once, just try LISTENING to your audience. Maybe they are trying to tell you something.