ProWrestling.net is reporting that WWE star Charlie Haas asked for his release from WWE several months ago. However, as opposed to granting that release, WWE actually re-signed Haas and gave him a raise, even though he hasn't been used on TV in a long while. The belief is that Kurt Angle had something in mind for Charlie Haas in TNA, and WWE wanted to avoid having him jump ship to the competition, so they re-signed him, gave him a raise, and are basically "benching him."
First of all, until I read this, I forgot Haas was on Smackdown. But it surprised me to read he asked for his release, and I was even more shocked to read that not only did WWE re-sign him, they gave him a raise! Now the part in this article which suggests Angle had something for Haas in TNA, was kind of odd to me. While it might be just speculation, I can't really see haas "fitting" into TNA. So, should Haas have jumped ship to TNA? Is he a fool for not doing so?
Now back to Haas staying on the blue brand. So, let me get this straight, WWE would rather "bench him" and pay him, than have him go to TNA??? What fucking sense does that make? If you're going to keep the guy around, maybe push him just enough to add some new life into Smackdown. Maybe they could put him in a tag team with Matt Hardy. I've read a lot of posts on here where people talk about how Matt should get pushed. Maybe putting him in a tag team wouldn't be such a bad idea? So do you think Haas should get pushed? Or are you okay with WWE benching him?