Triple H's Legacy

RIPbossman

Occasional Pre-Show
“Time to play the game. Time to play the GAME!..ha ha ha…” The green lighting, spitting out the mist of water, the sledgehammers… Triple H has been a staple of WWE television going back to the New Geneneration. The snobby blue blood, the co-founder of DX, the Cerebral Assasin, Evolution, The Authority, you couldn’t miss him over the last nearly two decades. Kayfabe wise he’s one of the most successful wrestlers ever to lace up a pair of boots. But in reality, when his in ring career is all said and done, what will be the legacy of the King of Kings?

One of the topics of discussion for Triple H on the internet include his “burials” of wrestlers and his 2003 reign of terror. We’ve all heard it to no end how he’s held down his peers. Quite frankly I agree with many who say he stood in the way of Booker, Steiner, Orton at WrestleMania 25 and especially Punk at Night of Champions 2011. It’s been said Triple H needed to beat CM Punk to look strong going into his match with Undertaker at WM 28. I really disagree that this is an excuse, because Punk caught lightening in a bottle with his Summer of Punk storyline. No great wrestler will truly be held down by one loss. But to recreate the white hot momentum Punk had in 2011 is too much to ask of any wrestler. Triple H, a 13 time world champion who beat damn near every big name you can think of, didn’t need that victory. Booker winning at WM 19 would have been an epic feel good moment, but instead everyone’s spirits were crushed, and Booker’s momentum came to a screeching halt.

However, he’s used his elite level of credibility to give back to the product. Benoit, Batista, Cena and Lesnar all got huge rubs from Triple H at big stages. Did you know Trips holds the record for most submission losses at WrestleMania? Tapping to Benoit, Cena and Undertaker. He added some luster to Taker’s legendary streak when he put him over at WM three times in three great matches. Batista was legitimized as a main eventer and World Champion by Triple H, and Cena’s victory at WM 22 cemented him as the face of the company.

He’s been very good with developing stories in his interviews. His facial expressions and change in the tone of his voice add to progressing whatever storyline he’s in. The anger in his voice is top notch whenever his character had his ego bruised and badly wants revenge, like after losing to Chris Benoit and The Shield. The smug grins make you think he’s overconfident when the storyline calls for it, like leading up to WrestleMania 22 against John Cena. He focuses on drawing out his current plot lines in promos. And while he does a good job in that sense, so many times it feels like he’s just going through the motions, just following the script. He just has a hard time staying fresh and keeping people’s interest from start to finish, unlike his peers Austin, Rock, Jericho, Angle etc. While Triple H is technically skilled at advancing stories on the microphone, it doesn’t make a difference if fans are mentally tuning him out or changing the channel.


As for his in ring work, that’s another topic discussed to death by IWC members. We all know the matches he bombed in. Nash, Steiner, Booker T, Orton on occasions, Batista… Since returning from his first quad tear, he’s been up and down in that regards. Maybe he just lost some of his work ethic because he knew he was established as the number one wrestler on his brand? Maybe aging and the extra muscle slowed him down.

As for his astonishing number of world title reigns, 13, it’s not as inflated as you’d think due to politics. He earned five world titles before the roster split started. In that era we saw Randy Orton, Edge, and John Cena reach double digit title reigns. All were won after the roster split, and Edge won all of his in a five year span. Triple H’s 13 isn’t too far off from what he would’ve gotten without any type of politics. And again, I’m not naïve enough to believe politics haven’t been a factor in his career. I just think maybe the number would be cut down to nine or ten, and the length of the reigns, especially his first run with just the big gold belt, would’ve been shorter. Vince wouldn’t be able to justify giving Triple H that kind of focus and tv time when his Raw segments grew so wearisome.

Degeneration X’s influence in wrestling history is greatly overstated, in my opinion. 1996 saw flashes of TV-14 type material, but not enough to get the WWF that rating. Sunny, Goldust, some vulgar language here and there… these flickers of mature programming are what the WWF went back to, turned up the volume on and used over and over again. Degeneration X ran with that mature theme more than anyone else, and in 1998 were a huge supporting force in making the WWF gain so much momentum. Wrestling fan or not, you heard the phrase “suck it” in 1998 and recognized their signature gesture. But as for being influential, I don’t buy it. They were just the first group of wrestlers to use it as a heavy theme on a weekly basis.




“Oh my God, oh my God, no! What the hell?..Oh my God, no. Oh my God no. Hunter what are you doing? (bell rings) This match up is underway, Bryan’s out cold. Randy Orton, Randy Orton (bell rings) has cashed in Money In The Bank. Orton is a seven time (WWE) Champion.” – Michael Cole on Randy Orton cashing in at Summer Slam 2013.

The two year anniversary the Authority coming to existence is right fast approaching, when Triple H and Randy Orton crushed Daniel Bryan’s first WWE title reign faster than his celebratory confetti rained from the rafters. This faction, lead primarily by Triple H, has dominated WWE’s airwaves since Summer Slam 2013. Through the good, bad and the ugly, the sledgehammer shots, Occupy Raw movements, firings, Kane’s mistreatment, and promos that drag on and on, they’ve been WWE programming’s key fixture since that August night two years ago. Even more so than John Cena, who’s steadily faded from being the face of the company to the degree he once was. I agree with the jaded fans who feel the Authority hasn’t been “BEST for business”. I emphasize “best”, because while they haven’t been best for business, they’ve still been pretty damn good.

Almost every wrestler who’s feuded with the Authority was over in a major way. Daniel Bryan had a ton of momentum in the summer of 2013, but after Triple H started squashing his championship dreams over and over again, his “yes” chants became deafening, to the point they became the anti-Authority battle cry. The storyline played out impeccably, regardless of the original plan. The Occupy Raw movement couldn’t have more perfectly symbolized how fans outright forced management WWE to change their WM plans. Big Show’s abuse as the Authority’s giant hit man, for lack of a better term, is one of the highlights of his career and his knockout punch to Triple H was one of the most satisfying comeuppances of a heel. Cody Rhodes, Dolph Ziggler and Ryback all reached a higher level after battling the Authority. Not the main event level, but a higher level none the less. Dean Ambrose stayed as over as anyone could while getting hardly any big wins over them.

However, the Authority do have their problem, besides the obvious one that their segments are boring and too long. Wrestlers who join them lose their identity to a certain level. The Shield had a collective identity as a pack of wolves, but really became anonymous henchmen once they sided with them. What little individual identity each had was lost during that time. Orton, the number 2 wrestler behind Cena for a while, became a faceless puppet for the Authority. Ironically called the “face” of the WWE, he didn’t stand out as a corporate champion the way Rock did in 1998-99. Rock stood out on his own with a distinct character. Even when Hollywood Hogan lead the N.W.O., most members had individuality. Orton’s feuds were really Triple H’s feuds, and Orton was just his muscle, and most of his character traits shown then were frustration with losing matches and with Triple H’s leadership. Same for Big Show when he joined the Authority, and left once he started his own program with Ryback and Miz. Kane in his current storyline and Seth Rollins may be exceptions, but without Seth ever being on his own we don’t know what he’s capable of, character wise. I think there’s more Seth can do without being the Authority’s top prize fighter.


Would he have the management position he does now without Stephanie? No. At least not that exact position. Triple H seems to love wrestling, and while he may be selfish with his own booking, it appears he has a great mind for it. NXT is doing well with him at the helm. He’s said he’s been sitting in on creative meetings since the late nineties, and obviously has first hand experience drawing money and performing before huge crowds. I have no problem with his current management position, earned or not, because WWE is a family business, like many businesses in America. If Steph married someone else with a background in wrestling, business, entertainment and/or marketing, they’d have a top position in WWE as well. That’s how family businesses work. Triple H admitted himself he might not have his current backstage status without being an in law, but would still have a similar position, and in my opinion, it could be with any major wrestling organization.

His legacy will be similar to that of Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, Roger Clemens, etc. The famous players of Major League Baseball who used steroids to reach an elite level will always have their careers tainted. How many homeruns would Barry Bonds and A-Rod have had they not used steroids? How many Cy Young awards for Clemens? We don’t know. In my opinion Triple H fit in with this crew. Each of these guys are probably HOF worthy without steroid use, just as Triple H would be had he never had backstage connections. But for many, there is a cloud of doubt over the aforementioned players’ careers and over Triple H’s. To say Triple H wouldn’t have been a big name player and a multi-time world champion without politics is ludicrous, especially considering his consistency during his initial main event run. Going back to Clemens, it’s believed he only earned 3 Cy Young awards legitimately, which alone is enough to make him a HOFer. Triple H probably could have achieved enough on his own merit, and possibly has, without politics (I’m not behind the scenes) to be one of wrestling’s top names.

Regardless of who Triple H married, he’d be a hall of famer, and a headlining one at that. While he possesses skill, he hasn’t always been consistent with his matches and promos. He’s held others back at their most inopportune times, but relatively few fans want to give him credit for using his elite credibility to give others huge rubs. Degeneration X’s influence may be exaggerated by WWE, but The Authority has been more beneficial to the product than most realize. Ultimately though, through the good, bad and the ugly, Triple H has proven he deserves most of the kayfabe accolades he’s been given, even if not all of them. He may not be at the level of a King of Kings, but a King none the less.
 
As with almost every other major star that's come along, Triple H will have his share of admirers and detractors. Some will applaud him for his work in the ring, his understanding of psychology, his use of storytelling, etc. while some will ridicule him as being overrated just as some do with Ric Flair. Some will bring up the fact that he was a major political player who used his clout to use others as a stepping stone while some will bring up the fact that such tactics can be and have been attributed to almost every major star in the wrestling industry as a whole. Some will say that he only got to where he is because of his relationship with Stephanie while others will accuse those of letting personal dislike over Triple H as a character, inside the ring, his tactics backstage, etc. blind them to the fact that no amount of nepotism can carry someone to the level of success he's earned without the genuine ability needed to sustain such a spot.

If you look at Triple H strictly as a professional wrestler and the world of kayfabe without bringing in all the various real life goings on behind the scenes he's been involved with or been accused of being part of, then you have someone with a genuinely strong legacy that's among the very top stars to debut in the last 30 years, at least. Aside from all the various titles he's won, he's a "founding father" of D-Generation X, one of the principle stars of the Attitude Era, a powerfully charismatic presence and has feuded with nearly every major American wrestling star that's debuted during my lifetime. Furthermore, what he's done the past few years with WWE's developmental program will add to his legacy behind the scenes in a positive way. There seems to be a general belief in wrestling that Triple H will be Vince McMahon's primary successor; if so and with NXT's continued growth, then the last pages of Triple H's story may not be written for decades to come.

Triple H has personal faults and shortcomings just like every other man, woman and child walking the face of the earth today. He's no saint, he's done some underhanded things in his career to get ahead in a cutthroat business who's had to swim in a virtual sea of sharks and managed to become one of the biggest, baddest sharks of them all.
 
Triple H dedicated to the business and respect the tradition of the industry. Because he really lived and breathed the business and always gave 110% every time he performs. He's also known to be an old school traditionalist giving homage to guys like Harley Race while his Stable Evolution was a homage to the Four Horsemen.

That said his dedication also means he's involved himself backstage in the WWE which in turn allowed him to gain a lot of political control during most of his time there. Perhaps Triple H has been the person to gain the most backstage influence in the WWE/WWF as an active member of the roster. And while I am sure he did for the business there's no doubt it's also help him elevate his cause faster and pushed the depushed people as a result. Guys like Orton, Batista, and Sheamus no doubt got a huge push because of Triple H while we saw the reverse happen to RVD, Jericho, allegedly Kurt Angle.

Bret Hart said a lot of harsh comments on Triple H. Saying he is a 4/10 wrestler at best due to his lack of innovation. In a sense that's true I mean count how many times Triple H had a five star match with no stipulations involved? You can name a few but not much can be considered great matches. Though this isn't a bad thing as I said Triple H is a traditionalist while his style hardly innovates in the ring Triple H's strength is through the execution of a more old school and transitional style. A more methodical mode of storytelling which creates a slower but more precise pace is where Triple H has always excelled.

So yeah that's my take on Triple H. An old school guy who loves the Business whose backstage political pull did allow him to elevate higher while bribing up or down others as well.
 
As with almost every other major star that's come along, Triple H will have his share of admirers and detractors.

That's so. To those fans who can't forgive political machinations, backstage maneuvering and marrying the boss's daughter, Triple H will be seen negatively..... as a conniving opportunist. Personally, I'd rather gauge his body of work in wrestling rings, his accomplishments, and his longevity...... and when one does that, I see one of the best performers of all time.

Still, I wonder what his career would have become had he made the move to WCW with his buddies Nash, Hall and Waltman. Can you imagine? Whatever success he achieved down there would have ended a couple years later when the company folded. Whether WWE took him back or not, there probably would have been no Cerebral Assassin, no multi-world titles.....and most likely no Stephanie or part ownership position in the company. Presumably, his entire life would have been different.

Talk about the road not taken.
 
To be honest I've never really been a Triple H fan.

1994 - 2001 I didn't watch very much WWF at all so only caught his fairly short WCW run and bits and pieces.

2002 - now I've seen much more WWE but have mainly concentrated on TNA and ROH so haven't seen all of Triple H's stuff.

I loved his Royal Rumble match against Mick Foley and I loved Evolution.

But Triple H has never really done it for me.

I think he's great as part of the Authority and he's done great stuff with NXT.

Maybe that is his legacy - Leading the WWE in to its future!
 
Triple H is right up there in my top 5 fav wrestlers of all time. There are points in his career that I found pretty unentertaining though. His early days as a Blue Blood guy who bowed and all that jazz ...didn't like that version of Hunter at all. It took me awhile to warm up to his finishing move The Pedigree , I wanted him to lift the guy up more in a tombstone fashion because it just didn't look good to me at the time. Another version of Hunter was his second or third reunion with DX with just him and HBK. It was just awkward seeing two guys pushing 40 coming down to the ring acting like teenagers and waving glow sticks around. One more downer for Triple H ....he beat Sting at the last Mania... not sure why that had to happen. ( ugh ) and his uncomfortable feud with Booker T that bordered very close to racism at times.

His days as a vicious, unrelenting S.O.B heel were excellent. There are few in the business than can pull off his heat when he was at the top of his game. His matches were a big deal and he was the master of the grudge match. His long feud with The Rock was probably one of the best feuds in the history of the company. He's a multiple time World Champion , you have to think in the next few years he'll be the guy calling the shots for RAW and SMACKDOWN , he's a smart wrestling guy and if WCW has taught us anything, you need a wrestling guy calling the shots or the product will suffer.

I can't remember what RAW it was but to hear J.R screaming at Triple H and calling him a son of a bitch to close the show was really funny at the time. He is the best ring general of all time and rarely , ever botched a move.
 
Triple H, a name which had put over many wrestlers over the years in WWE. I remember the moment in Royal Rumble when he returned from injury and entered at #29 everyone would've thought he's going to win, but he lost to John Cena who entered at #30. Apparently, even if the criticizers considered him for burying many talents, he had put over further more than that.

His feud with Shawn Michaels has drawn hell lot of money and sold many PPVs. The Degeneration X Reunion is money. How could you think he can just simply put over the "$9.99"?? His backstage segment with Seth Rollins before ladder match with Dean Ambrose was overwhelmingly amazing.

He certainly is the King of Kings in many aspects. Every great king without criticizers is just a denial. His hardwork in the development of NXT just speaks his legacy. Nothing more to say

Cheers!!
 
Triple H has his share of faults and mistakes, just like every other pro wrestler.
He usually gets criticism for two main reasons.

1 - He refuses to put over other pro wrestlers.

He defeated Sting at WM31, just because Vince can't put the Monday Night Wars to rest. (That wasn't necessarily his fault)
He defeated Booker T at WM19, proving African-Americans and other minorities couldn't succeed.
He defeated CM Punk at Night of Champions 2011, effectively killing Punk's momentum.
He defeated Sheamus at WM26.
He challenged for the Streak 3 times. We could've gotten Taker vs. Cena or Rock.
He retired Mick Foley and didn't put over Rock at WM16.
He defeated Brock Lesnar at WM29.

I don't agree with some of these, but he's gotten plenty of criticism for all of these.

2 - He needs others to be successful.

DX, Evolution, The Kliq, The Authority, Marrying Steph, etc. These are all examples of HHH needing others to get over. I don't agree with this, but he gets criticism for this.

Overall, Triple H will go down as one of the greatest pro wrestlers of all time. He has made mistakes, but everyone has. He has done some great things for the business, but haters and detractors are just going to see him negatively, regardless of what he does.
 
I break Triple H's career down into a few categories:

From the RAW after WrestleManiaIV in 1998 until he tore his quad on RAW in 2001 - Triple H was fucking awesome. Straight up. He was an integral part of the show. Yes, he was a supporting player, yet still an incredible over player, in DX in 1998. Then with his turn to the Corporation in 1999 - and ultimately his transition into The Game with the McMahon-Helmsley Faction in 1999-2000, he became one of the best heels of all time, in my opinion.

After the quad tear - things were different. The babyface run in 2002 was weak and overshadowed by the return of The Rock, Hulk Hogan and Brock Lesnar. So he goes back to being heel - and throughout the end of 2002 and all of 2003 and until WrestleMania XX in 2004, he was the leading character on RAW with Evolution. In many ways I didn't like Triple H at all during this time. His 20 minute promos, him going over everyone, etc was becoming boring and stale, at a time where SmackDown! was destroying RAW in terms of entertainment. Yet at the same time, he was a heel. You weren't supposed to like him. Even as a smark, you didn't like him. Seeing him tap to Benoit was one of the greatest WrestleMania moments of all time (which we'll unfortunately never see again).

After WrestleMania XX, or maybe WrestleMania 21 when he lost to Batista, this is where I really stopped caring about Triple H. It was time to move on. It was time for Batista, Cena, Orton and Edge. They were the next main eventers to carry the torch. Yet Triple H was constantly in there, booking himself into main events and title victories that he didn't need or deserve. This is the most groan-worthy Triple H period for me. Up until he became a part timer and really only started wrestling once or twice a year a couple years ago.

Overall - he owns his own legacy. Being in charge of the company that can erase or create people on a whim - it's all up to him. He will ensure that he optically goes down as one of the best champions of all time. And he has, no pun intended, the authority to do so.
 
Ultimately HHH will be know as whatever wwe wants him to be known as. Look at Hogan - when he is working with wwe and they need him, his legacy is the biggest star even in the company but as soon as they don't need him, he is a relic of another time and quickly forgotten. Unless he does something really dumb and loses his spot in wwe, they will say he is one of the greatest ever.

Personally, I think his legacy should be one the best wrestlers of his day but not one of the greatest ever, someone who worked hard to move up the ladder but also used backstage politics to keep down anyone who might threaten that spot. Bret Hart can be pretty bitter at times but he made a comment about HHH never having a great match and I can't say I disagree. When you think back over the past 20-25 years of wwe and great matches, you think the Bret and Shawn Iron Man Match, Bret and Austin at Mania, etc but most people will never think of a HHH match despite the fact that he has been in many Mania main events. Why? If you look at it, he puts on a solid matches but they just don't have that extra whatever to make them classics. Plus, there is the politics part - his match with Booker for the title, no matter how good of a match it is, can't be considered a classic because HHH won when he clearly should have lost. His insistence on not losing to Booker means the ending takes away from that match and I think that happens with a lot of his matches. You can't look at 3/4 of the match and say it is great when the ending is horrible. So that's why I think his legacy should be one of the best of his era but you can't call him one of the greatest like you would with Bret, HBK, or Austin.
 
Whether you like HHH or not, you have to give him the credit for his longevity in the WWE.

His backstage politics are well known, but he was given that power and he used it to his full advantage. Were some of what he did right, maybe not, but to stay ahead in this industry you have to use whatever leverage you have. I don't fault him for doing so either.

As for him holding back or burying other wrestlers, well I'm sure most of the top names can be guilty of that from time to time. In HHH's case though, I remember last year when he and Evolution put the Shield over in two consecutive PPV's.

Plus look at the work he's doing to bring up the newest crop of WWE Superstars, and I think his work speaks for itself. All you have to do is watch one NXT woman's match to know that he has a passion for this business, that goes beyond what most are willing to put into it.

I also believe that if he had wanted he could have broke Flair's record, but was more interested in the future of the WWE than himself.

He has grown up and realizes that this company will not grow while Vince is still around. Vince believes that by resting the whole company on John Cena's shoulders, that is best for business. With what HHH is doing in NXT, he is looking beyond the Cena's and Orton's of this generation, and making sure that fans who might not even be born yet, have something exciting to watch years for now.

Not only is this about personal growth for him, it's about the business side of it as well, and he has balanced both of sides of this equation quite well. When Vince can no longer carry on, I believe the WWE will be quite safe in the hands of HHH and Stephanie.
 
Here's the thing about the Piece of Trash.

It can be summed up in this way -- he will SADLY go down as "one of the greatest of all-time" because he is an owner of WWE and they will make sure he is remembered as such. His legacy has been fabricated, marketed, and been subject to amazing revisionist history. Even when the WWE banners roll before any TV show, we see Andre, The Rock, and… The Piece of Trash as the first three images -- as if to suggest Piece of Trash was EVER on the level of the other two guys. Hah, please. Stop the pain.

Had his political baloney not gotten to the point of it being an art, I always thought he would go down as an extremely respected performer, a la ARN ANDERSON. And that is a huge complement, because I do really believe he devolved into the supreme Piece of Trash, supplanting Hogan as the biggest scum of all-time in pro wrestling (although, at least Hogan DREW MONEY -- something Piece of Trash will NEVER be able to claim, because any close analysis of his career will EASILY demonstrate that his "money" feuds were when he was paired with MAIN EVENT PEOPLE).

His first big push came when he was the SIDEKICK of Shawn Michaels. Given his ability to put on a solid match, that right there would have cemented his place as an Arn Anderson type -- the sidekick to "The Man." When HBK retired after putting over Austin at WM14, Piece of Trash "took over" D/X, but what people seem to forget is that when Piece of Trash took over, D/X was a MID-CARD STABLE. With Shawn Michaels, D/X was in the main event. But, since Piece of Trash owns the company now, we get these lovely DVDs and revisionist history sentiments that he's the leader of the group, the co-equal to HBK (cough cough, NEVER, you Piece of Trash), blah blah blah.

Then his political clout got to the point that they put the WWF/E title on him, and I will never forget or FORGIVE the bookers for what was sheer PAIN. Who can forget that 1-2 year run with the title where he opened EVERY EFFING SHOW AND HE JUST BABBLED ON AND ON AND ON AND ON FOR HALF AN HOUR!!! "I AM THE GAME, I AM THAT DAMN GOOD, I NEED TO SHUT THE HELL UP BECAUSE NOBODY BELIEVES I DESERVE THIS RUN AT THE TOP." I mean, my gawd, WWF/E just felt like "hmm, if we just shove that Piece of Trash down everyone's throats for a few years, people will finally believe he's in the same league as Austin or Rock."

He's feuded with a who's who in wrestling -- Austin, Foley, Rock, Vince, HBK, and now when he rarely "graces us with his presence" in the ring, he picks Sting, or the wildly over Daniel Bryan, or Lesnar. I mean, has ANYONE ever feuded with such a list? Oh ya, Hogan did. Austin did. Rock did. Of course, THOSE GUYS DREW MONEY. Piece of Trash never drew a dime unless his dance partner was the bigger star.

With the exception of Batista, I can't think of one other wrestler who Piece of Trash put over AND WENT ON TO BECOME A STAR. Benoit didn't become a household name after Piece of Trash tapped at WM20. Daniel Bryan was already over with the fans, so him beating Piece of Trash meant nothing. Undertaker was already over. Lesnar certainly was. The list goes on. Oh wait, and he couldn't even put Punk over, when they had their one pointless match the year before Punk left -- oh wait, but it's supposed to be an honor to work with Piece of Trash. Glad you left, Punk. You don't have to work with trash if you don't want to. Good for you, man.

Is he a good ring general? Sure. But there are TONS of great (hell, BETTER) ring technicians who never got the push.

Had his ego not gotten in the way, like I said, he could have been a highly respected person my diehards, a la Arn Anderson. Instead, we are left with the legacy of what the machine wants you to believe.

I await the continued revisionist history. But I've watched wrestling since the 80s, and I think I've seen enough to know that Piece of Trash isn't even half of the legacy WWE is going to paint him out to be.

But hey, he's the "genius" behind NXT! Oh wait, that's what the dirt sheets want us to believe. And I'm sure Piece of Trash has worked them, too.

I don't know if I could rate 100 wrestlers ahead of Piece of Trash, as Bret Hart suggests. But in terms of LEGACY, I certainly could rate at least 100 off the top of my head.











.
 
Hmmm, I am thinking World Class Mark doesn't like Hunter too much ....:p

This question shows a huge issue with the wwe network right now. If you are interested in a wrestler, you can go back and see them in their ppv matches. By doing that, HHH comes across as a dominant wrestler but without those tv matches to put the matches into perspective, you only get a partial picture. You are never going to see the buildup to his match with Booker T, you are never going to see how he worked his way out of dropping the title to Hardy, etc. You really do miss out on seeing how he only put over the guys he wanted and rarely ever put over someone new. Even with Batista, how long was he on Raw as the champ after beating HHH? Batista's career was built on Smackdown. Yes those matches made an impact but wwe was selling Batista's size - he was going to be pushed no matter who he faced.
 
He's probably the best heel since Hogan. If HHH retired today, he's a legit Hall of Famer. I believe he still got some great matches left in him. I'd love to see him in one-on-ones with Ambrose, Reigns, Rollins.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,834
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top