And no, I don't have to admit that WWE is better. They've been around longer? So what? That means they USED to be good, which I will admit. Up until the past four years, they were great. But no, I don't have to say they are better JUST because they have been around longer. In fact, they haven't been around longer. TNA is the NWA, which has been around forever. That belt that Jarret holds (which is blasphemous, I will give you that) was held by Lou Thesz, Dusty Rhodes, Harley Race, Ric Flair, Dory Funk, Buddy Rogers, Jack Brisco. So yeah, who's been around longer?
Anyway, just because they have had TV time, and money, doesn't equal a better show. Their shows aren't entertaining in the least bit. Did you see the match between Big Show and Batista? Oh my god that was terrible.
WWE does have its shining stars. CM Punk will be great there, if only they would let him use the pepsi plunge. Paul London, Brian Kendrick, Chris Benoit, Sabu, Tony Mamaluke, Rey Mysterio, Shawn Michaels, Triple H, RVD, and probably the best overall wrestler Kurt Angle. But, for the most part, these guys are either held down, or held back from what they can really do. You won't see WRESTLING matches the caliber that TNA offers in a WWE ring. One Night Stand 2 was so misleading in what I thought I was going to get in the new ECW.
I don't have to admit anything from what you put in your post, because none of it means a rats ass to me. I look at wrestling for what it is. I don't want to watch WWE because it has nothing of any caliber.
Though, I do agree that for the most part this is getting really immature. You apparently aren't allowed to have an actual discussion that makes sense without the inane ramblings of a 12 year old.