Once again, dick wad, just because you didn't like what they had to deliver doesn't mean they didn't deliver. Delivery is an arbitrary term. The success of it thereafter is an entirely different issue you still can't seem to grasp the concept of
Do you know what the word arbitrary means? Do you even read what I write, or do you just take ever opportunity you can to continue ranting and raving incoherently about a show you don't enjoy?
Arbitary from what I know is to define someone who chooses an opinion without an actual reasoning. Something you show very well throughout all your comments. You have still not defended what TNA is doing, and how they say they'll give a big surprise and then they don't deliver.
You obviously have no idea what's going on here. What are you smoking?
Yes, you watch WWE and buy their PPV's which makes you a mark for their show. Again, do you have any idea how to follow logic? I called you a WWE mark, so you defend against that by defining what a mark is? Yeah, and Russo makes no sense...
Actually you don't seem to get this. I watch WWE and buy their PPVs, but I wouldn't consider myself a mark of theres. I support Liverpool FC, yet I watch all soccer matches that doesn't mean I'm a mark for Manchester United if I watch a match of theirs.
Its you who needs to whip out the old urban dictionary and see what these words actually mean mate. You have no clue, what you're doing.
Oh, and when you have 20+ years of history behind your company it doesn't take nearly as much talent as you think it does to retain that 3.2 million (and dropping) viewers a week. The same marks that watch Hornswoggle bury another wrestler who could punt him into next week are the same who rant and rave about the future of vanilla performers like John Morrison. Neither could hold a candle to the WWF of old, so why are they so highly praised? Gee, I don't suppose it could be a dedicated sense of loyalty, could it? You know, that thing you accuse TNA fans of having (to a fault), as though it's a bad thing just because you don't like their programming?
I can just go back in time and prove that wrong. NWA was at one point the dominant force in professional wrestling, Vince McMahon purchased all the territories with the top performers and rebranded his company the WWF. Why did the NWA not stay up since they had so much history, going by your logic?
And then you go back and bring up John Morrison as a "vanilla" performer. TNA has Matt Hardy, Eric Young and Rob Terry. Are you trying to bury TNA with every comment you make? That's exactly what you're doing. And many people stopped watching WWE. They have a new demographic, maybe you heard its called PG. TNA couldn't do PG, they don't have the talent, except for the few wrestlers who can do shit in the company like AJ Styles, Samoa Joe, Nigel McGuinness, Doug Williams and Robert Roode. And all except one of them can be considered ROH made! TNA have such a miniscule fanbase. There is a reason on like every wrestling forum people complain and scrutinize their product.
Its because even compared to WWEs PG stuff, TNA sucks.
You put WWE's product on TNA's broadcast (essentially eliminating it's dedicated audience) and it fails faster than submarine with a screen door.
I more-or-less answered this above. If you took everyone from WWE over to TNA, all the performers and the writers and the producers, they can make it work because they all have talent, they know how to make it work. TNA don't, and haven't since mid-2008, when I gave up on TNA, cause it was shit!
See first reply. You still fail to grasp the concept of delivery not being contingent on you being happy. 1 million+ weekly disagree with you.
You're right, but the thing is a good portion of the TNA fans would also be WWE fans as well. But not vice-versa, due to WWE's product, I'll give you an example. I know somebody who attended the Royal Rumble, he was sitting in front of two people and when Kevin Nash returned they had no clue he had been in TNA. They thought he was just gone for 7 years.
Some people don't even know TNA exists, and the 3.2 million which tune into WWE; actually, I'll correct myself, a majority of them will agree with me.
This is the worst insult I've ever read in my life. Did you even think about what you wrote there, or is this more of your verbal diarrhea masquerading as point?
Masquerading? That word doesn't fit there at all you fucking idiot! haha You're one of these, "I'll use moderately big words and make myself seem half intelligent" types, you just said...
"Is that more of your verbal diarrehia covering/pretending at this point?"
Smart one dude. Really. Keep this up, I'm liking it now.
Then I suggest you take your incessant and baseless ramblings to the general TNA complaint thread where they actually belong so the topics posted here can actually stay on point — something you don't seem capable of doing.
I will in the future. But for now, seeing as I'm obviously getting a considerable rise from you with every response you direct towards me as well as the fact that you care so much on some, "WWE marks" opinion, with you being such a "loyal TNA follower" that you have to respond to every comment with no actual debate instead just some stupid, generic crap that you can find at the back of your brain which lays there in a cancerous, deformed state.
Try harder mate, you'll need to try MUCH harder then that. For someone who comes across as such a "big internet man", you, much like every TNA surprise arent living up to your label.
I hate when TNA pulls this BS. They hype up something to be the most amazing thing to happen in wrestling since Suirvivor Series 1990. But it always bombs. 1/4/10, 10/10/10, its all complete molarky. TNA's problem is that they advertise too freakin much. Quit making us look foward to empty promises and just give a good two hours of wrestling on Thursday to look foward to.
