The John Cena List: Part One
Me tearing you a new one part 1!
I was challenged by a poster named General Disarray to create my John Cena Hate List, so I am. This is part one of The John Cena List. In this part I will discuss the major reasons why I dislike him. In part two, I will discuss the minor reasons why I dislike him and I will also list the very few reasons I might like him. So, lets get started!
Get to it! I've been asking for this longer than GD has been... Shame!
*Remember; this is an opinionated post. I am in no way, shape, or form saying that my opinion is fact!*
THANK GOD!!!
Reasons I Dislike John Cena
Let's hear them...
Alright... what about it?
If you have ever read any of my posts on my views of John Cena, then you have read me list the, 5 or 6 moves of doom, as a major reason that I dislike John Cena.
OMG!!!5 movz of doom!!!!

We've been over this... He has more moves than 5...
We all know what these moves are, but for those of you who are not familiar with them, I will list them once again, in order. 2 shoulder blocks, modified back body drop (idk if this is the official name for it, but I am calling it this), 5 knuckle shuffle, and the Attitude Adjustment. Also, if he misses the Attitude Adjustment then we usually have some transition wrestling for about a minute or two until he either hits the Attitude Adjustment or he locks in the STF.
Hmm... let's see about that... Let's go back in time, back to the heel days of John Cena... Let's see him use 5 moves...
[youtube]kXrO70AcC4M&feature[/youtube]
[youtube]yPqTQm_bJXw&feature[/youtube]
I see more than five there...
Why don't you go look up some of his match from 07. The ones that you said you liked. Look at his matches from unfogiven 06 to backlash 07. He had great matches, using more than 5 or 6 moves. Especially his matches again Umaga. His matches against Shawn Michaels? How bout those matches, you go watch those and tell me he uses 5 moves. How about his matches with Triple h? Mania? Night of Champions... Does he use five moves to finish a match? yes, a lot of people uses those around 5 moves to end a match. Since when dose those moves become his move set?
I get attacked all of the time that it isnt a wrestlers move set that makes the wrestler good. I couldnt agree with this statement more, however, I believe that it is a combination of all things that makes a wrestler good or even great, IMO.
I agree, I think that a wrestler should have a good move set should make a wrestler good. Also I believe that they need more as you said to be the total package.
Of course, Cena marks will throw Hulk Hogan at me, as he is considered the greatest professional wrestler of all time and to say that he had a limited move set is an understatement.
Yes, Hogan had an extremely limited move set. More so Than Cena.
Hulk Hogan, though, was the greatest hype man/crowd controller of all time. His matches are not remembered for being wrestling clinics, but his matches are remembered for being wrestling spectacles.
Yes, I agree with you there. Hogan new how to put on a match to keep everyone entertain, for a time.
John Cena is nowhere near the level of entertainer that Hulk Hogan was and he probably never will be.
I agree, and disagree. I believe that Cena is a great entertainer, one of the best that has come through the wwe. I also believe that he's slow but surely climbing up the rungs to reach greatness.
Let me to ask you this question. How big was Hogan in the 80s? Huge, right? He could entertain fans right? How long did he have that face gimmick? Over 15 years... I grantee you that if we had the same opportunity now, to look at Hogan then in the light that we look at Cena now. We would bash him just as much, if not more so. Look, Cena has had the same gimmick for 4 years, and people are screaming that he's stale predictable and so on. Imagine having Hogan for 15... Could you imagine how harsh we would be on him? How can you say that Hogan was great, and A amazing entertainer, but Cena isn't anything special? It just doesn't make sense.Allow me to put it this way. It's illogical to judge Cena in the way that you do, and then treat Hogan the way you do, why? Because you're judging on two different scales. We had Hogan when we were growing up and adored the spectacle that was Hulkamania. We have Cena when we're adults that are critical of everything that happens in the wrestling business. Automatically giving us an unfair bias against Cena. 15 years ago we weren't arguing about people being shoved down our throats. We loved it all and took it all in.
Back to Cena however. It really isnt his moves that I have a major problem with because almost every wrestler has a set of signature moves that they will use at some point in a match,
Yep, that is the case with all wrestlers, I'm glad you realize that.
but it is the way in which he uses those moves. You can call a Cena match like you are the one that booked it. A typical Cena match goes like this: Cena will start off strong with some punches or kicks, he will then get his ass whipped for about 90% of the match, go into his signature moves of death, and win the match with his opponent taking little damage throughout the match.
Hmm. I disagree, not all Cena matches happen that way, look at his match that I listed from 07... He had some great back and forth match with Umaga, Michaels. Or his Feud with Edge, they had great back and forth matches, what about his matches triple h? Same. I find it funny that you get on him for this. Then you say you want him to be dominant, well we had that when he destroyed the miz. You complained then...
Now other wrestlers like Shawn Michaels might end the match almost the same way every time, however, their matches do not go the same way, same pace, or use the same type of heel/face psychology all the time. As far as in ring work goes, Cena is a one trick pony. Sure, I have been satisfied with Cena matches before, but those few Cena matches do not out number the many that I dislike or consider to be bad matches.
Wait, Michaels is more so than Cena, He gets his ass handed to him. Then come back. Shawn is more a one trick pony than Cena.
The John Cena Push:
When John Cena was first drafted to Raw, this really wasnt a problem because we had Batista and HHH finishing up their feud. So Cena took a back seat to those two for about a month until Batista was drafted to Smack Down. When Batista left Raw, however, the flood gates were opened and Cena hell poured out into the wrestling audience.
How so? He's the champion, he's suppose to get the limelight. That's what happens. If you don't like that, then you could say that jbl was pushed down our throats, Batista was pushed down our throats. Austin and The Rock were pushed down our throat. He was the main man on the main show. He's going to be the spotlight. I would be worried if the Champion didn't get the spotlight.
Cena was made out to be the next greatest thing in professional wrestling since Steve Austin, but it didnt take like Steve Austin did because Austin was built up over a period of time and we, the fans, ultimately made the decision on Austin. We, the fans, werent so lucky with Cena.
I don't remember him being made into the next big thing. Wait, Cena was built up over three years. Longer than Austin, who made his impacted in around 2. The fans did make the choice with Cena if you remember. He was heel with the rapper gimmick. It was right around the video that I posted that he started going face, because the fans were starting to get behind him. They were loving his raps, they were cheering more and more for him. Like we did with Austin. They were both heels who were winning over the crowd.
Cena was ultimately shoved down our throats for a very long period of time.
Where is the hate for Batista then? He went and held the title for almost as long as Cena, before he was injured. This is one thing that I don't understand. Why does Cena receive so much hate for being shoved down our throats, but Batista gets a pass? Was he shoved down our throats? there was a point when I would agree with you, but he dropped the belt for three months. Then held it for a year. Which I personally enjoyed.
IMO he wasnt proven enough to be the top star in the WWE and I think that is why he was received on Raw, at first, in such a bad light. Cena would be booed out of the building for a very long time and this was the top face in the WWE.
Hold on, I don't remember Cena being booed out of the building till late 06 07... Not earlier than that. In fact...
[youtube]vU7lIAg2uJM[/youtube]
That's a pretty big pop for someone who wasn't welcomed.
Or
[youtube]XIEOi0DpUNg&feature[/youtube]
That's a pretty good pop from what I heard. Are you going to tell me that those were edited in?
Both of those were with in his first couple of months... So I don't see him being booed out of the arena...
Now if that isnt the fans telling you something, I dont what is. WWE, however, stayed the course and it seemed like the more we booed, the more Cena was shoved into the spotlight. Before long, he was dominating Raw, while still getting booed.
Telling me what? He wasn't I just proved that. If you still think I don't know what to tell you. It wasn't in that time that Cena was booed, it was later.
Fans were tired of seeing Cena, but the more we hated it, the more we got. WWE ultimately made a good decision with Cena by letting him go on a very lengthy title run. IMO, this won a lot of people over with Cena because he was actually having some pretty good feuds and matches while in this run. His title run did a lot in terms of making the WWE title prestigious again and it gave us a lot of new feuds with the Main Event on Raw, unlike we have now.
Here's the problem. Like I said Cena wasn't booed at that point. He was booed during his year long reign, and then when he came back in 08 and went back into the title scene. I agree that his year long run was good for him. He had gave us very interesting feuds that gave us good matches.
So why Cena really isnt shoved on us anymore, however, your die hard wrestling fan remembers how easily he came up into the spotlight and it was literally a reaction of, Who the fuck does he think he is?
Not really, because not many people said that. Look Cena was out of the title scene for 3 months. 3 months that Cena didn't go near a title. He stayed away doing his own thing. At least he's not to the level of Batista or Triple h. Remember on Smackdown from 07 through the first part of 08. Batista was in every main event match. What about Triple h, how many main event's has he been in? The only people that had a problem with him going back to the near the title was you, and those that hate Cena.
You marks might say that Orton is pushed on us now, but I say that Orton was years in the making. He worked very hard, what with HHH burying him, working with The Undertaker, jobbing to Hulk Hogan, and working with DX to get where he is now. So I consider Orton proven to be a good main event star and it seemed like he was molded into carrying the WWE title. Cena was just pushed to the top too hard and too fast, IMO.
Let's think about this... He was given a reign for 3 weeks, because Brock left. He got that reign so that Brock wouldn't be the youngest wwe champion. I think that he worked very well with 'Taker. Hogan, meh. Dx. meh. To me he hasn't impressed me. Look the guy had one of the most boring 6 month reigns in history, besides his feud with Hardy. The guy is known to be lazy in the ring, and he's has his moments on the mic.
The John Cena Character:
A lot of people remember the Rapper John Cena from Smack Down, but when he got to Raw he became the uber babyface that we enjoy now. There really isnt that much to say about John Cenas character. At first, it wasnt an issue. Lately, however, his character has become a bit boring and predictable.
I've said this before. What about 'Taker, he's had the same gimmick for longer than Cena. Yes he changes it up in the ring from time to time, but for the most part it's been the same. Look at Hogan. Like I said he had the same style of gimmick for 20 years. Yet he gets a pass. HBK, same story. Yet Cena's gimmick gets ripped apart.
He comes across a lot of times as a silly comic relief and then he tries to get serious on us by cutting a very enraged promo here and there. It really kills his characters credibility to be so silly and then be so serious. Sometimes it is hard to figure out just what John Cena is supposed to be. I am just going to stick with the uber babyface who is predictable and stale with what he is going to do.
How does it kill his character? He's a funny guy that doesn't taker crap. When he gets it he goes off. If your trying to figure out what he's trying to be then you are reading into wrestling to much. Step back and change the way that you view it. I love how you revert to bashing him, when you don't have anything else to say about him.
The John Cena Promo:
This one really isnt a huge issue to me, but I do find his promos to be a bit stale or bland sometimes. I much rather prefer a serious Cena promo as opposed to a Cena trying to be funny, but ultimately coming across as stupid promo. When HHH and HBK try the funny promo, they catch hell from us, but no one bitches about when John Cena does it.
Yeah, because unlike Hbk, or HHH. Cena can be funny. If you have problem with Cena being comic relief than you have a problem with Jericho, and The Rock. Why do I say that, because a majority of both of their promos were based in comedy. Look at how many Names The Rock had for everyone? Every single promo he ever did he was cracking jokes. Jericho can be labeled the same. Though he has changed his gimmick in the last year. He's was mainly based in comedy. Cena is the same as both of these men. If you're going to bash Cena, I want to hear you bash the Rock, and Jericho for their styles of promos.
His serious promos are much better, however, they are very predictable. If I were Josh Matthews and asked him if his ass itched, he would spend the next 5 minutes yelling to everyone about how everybody got an ass itch from time to time and that you shouldnt scratch it in public and if he gets an ass itch at the PPV, it isnt going to stop him from achieving his ultimate goal and blah blah blah.
Once again I point you to The Rock, how many times did he make fun of Kevin Kelly? Or Michael Cole? Or Jonathan Coachmen, or Lilian? hmm? Each time he was interviewed by them that's the answer. If you are going to hate on Cena, hate on The Rock... Until I see you doing that, then I'm not going to agree with on this.
The John Cena Conclusion:
IMO, John Cena is just all around bland, boring, stale, and predictable. It might be a matter of taste or style, but I just dont find John Cena appealing at all. He is about as interesting as watching paint dry. He is the top face in the company, however, so there must be something good about him, right? When ever you find out what that is, please tell me.
You have the right to your opinion, but I find it extremely misguided. I don't find anything in it that is Logical at all.
BTW marks dont come back with its a business and he makes the most money and he should be the top because of that. He isnt making anyone in this forum money, is he? Then why should his ability to draw affect us in the least?
Cuz that's exactly what I was going to do. No His ability to draw speaks for it self. He's the biggest Draw that wwe has. If he wasn't, then why is he the face of the company?